Files
accounted/app/api/transactions/[id]/match-invoice/__tests__/route.test.ts
T
Jonas FlodénandJakob Wennberg 64ea0fef02 fix(transactions): resolve customer-invoice payment account from cash_account_id (#987)
* refactor(transactions): add shared settlement-account resolution helper

Cherry-picked from fork/worktree-starry-waddling-wirth (PR #985) commit
34d5d35 — pulling in just the new lib/bookkeeping/settlement-account.ts
helper and its test, without the match-supplier-invoice route changes
from that PR (those depend on 8bfc31d, not yet on main, and are out of
scope here).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* fix(transactions): resolve customer-invoice payment account from cash_account_id

Customer-invoice payment matching never resolved the bank leg from the
matched transaction's own cash_account_id: it was unconditionally
hardcoded to 1930 in buildInvoicePaymentClearingLines,
createInvoicePaymentJournalEntry, and createInvoiceCashEntry, with no
override parameter at all. Any bank receipt landing in a non-primary
cash/bank account (a secondary SEK account, or a foreign-currency
account like 1940 for EUR) was silently misbooked to 1930 -- the same
class of bug PR #985 fixed on the supplier-invoice side, except
unconditional there (no stale-setting trigger needed).

Adds an optional paymentAccount parameter (default '1930', preserving
behavior for every caller that doesn't pass one) to the three lib
functions, and threads resolveSettlementAccount(cash_account_id) through
every real bank-transaction-matching call site: the dashboard
match-invoice route (POST + preview), its v1/MCP-facing counterpart, and
the agent/MCP match_transaction_invoice commit path. Deliberately left
on default 1930: mark-paid (dashboard + v1, no bank transaction in
scope), fix-cash-mismatch (narrow historical repair tool for a different
bug), and the agent mark_invoice_paid commit path.

Brings in lib/bookkeeping/settlement-account.ts (cherry-picked from
fork/worktree-starry-waddling-wirth commit 34d5d35) so this PR is
mergeable independently of #985's merge order.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* test(invoice-entries): cover ROT/RUT 1513 line stays fixed under a non-default paymentAccount

Compliance-bot finding on PR #987: createInvoiceCashEntry's paymentAccount
override was only tested against a plain standard_25 invoice, never
combined with a ROT/RUT deduction_type item. The 1513 receivable line was
already correctly untouched by paymentAccount (it's never the bank leg),
this just closes the test-coverage gap.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* fix(bookkeeping): abort instead of silently defaulting to 1930 when settlement-account lookup errors

Same shared-helper fix as PR #985/#986: resolveSettlementAccount now
throws BookkeepingDatabaseError on a genuine cash_accounts query error
instead of warning and falling back to 1930. An explicit cash_account_id
almost certainly resolves to a non-1930 account, so a transient failure
masking it risked the same class of misbooking this whole PR series
exists to fix, just via infra flakiness instead of a stale setting.

No route/commit.ts changes needed: match-invoice (POST + preview) run
under withRouteContext's existing catch-all, and commitPendingOperation
already has identical generic bookkeeping-error handling for every other
engine failure. Added regression tests for all three call sites
(dashboard POST, preview, and the agent/MCP commit path) confirming the
abort rather than assuming the shared infrastructure handles it silently.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* fix(v1): guard resolved settlement account against chart of accounts

Closes the two remaining gaps from jakobwennberg's triage on #987
(after rebasing onto main and picking up the already-pushed
resolveSettlementAccount abort-on-error fix):

- Added the v1 match-invoice route-level test coverage that was
  missing (cash-account threading, BOOKKEEPING_DATABASE_ERROR abort,
  ACCOUNTS_NOT_IN_CHART), mirroring the dashboard route's existing
  settlement-account-resolution tests.
- Added the same findUnresolvableAccounts pre-validation guard against
  chart_of_accounts that 32c07c4 added to #986's match-supplier-invoice
  route, gated on !customLines since that is the only branch here that
  consumes the resolved paymentAccount.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* test(bookkeeping): align settlement-account error assertion with #985

Use .rejects.toBeInstanceOf(BookkeepingDatabaseError) instead of
toMatchObject({ constructor: ... }), matching #985's edef79d follow-up
(the assertion was correct either way, but this is the more idiomatic
check and now makes the shared helper's test file byte-identical
across #985/#986/#987, removing the add/add merge conflict between
them noted in the merge-order validation.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* test(invoice-payment-lines): add missing 3740 coverage for non-1930 paymentAccount

CodeRabbit nitpick on #987: the test named "...does not affect the
FX-diff or öresavrundning lines" only exercised the 3960 FX-diff
branch, never the pure-SEK 3740 öresavrundning branch it also claimed
to cover. Split into two tests: the existing one renamed to describe
only its FX-diff coverage, plus a new pure-SEK sub-krona-short case
with a resolved non-1930 paymentAccount asserting the 3740 line books
correctly and the bank leg lands on the resolved account, not 1930.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* fix(ci): quote compliance-pr.yml name to fix invalid YAML

The unquoted colon in `name: compliance: review (advisory)` (introduced
by #890's em-dash removal, which swapped an em dash for a colon
in-place) makes YAML read it as a nested mapping key, so GitHub can't
parse the workflow at all - every run fails with 0 jobs scheduled.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

* Revert "fix(ci): quote compliance-pr.yml name to fix invalid YAML"

This reverts commit e7c890245d1834cd8f3c9b13a2bc3247fea7eacb.

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>

---------

Signed-off-by: Jonas Flodén <jonas@floden.nu>
Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <jakob.wennberg@gmail.com>
2026-07-12 21:23:19 +02:00

1221 lines
48 KiB
TypeScript
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import {
createMockRequest,
parseJsonResponse,
createMockRouteParams,
createQueuedMockSupabase,
makeTransaction,
makeInvoice,
makeCustomer,
} from '@/tests/helpers'
const { supabase: mockSupabase, enqueue, reset } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
createClient: () => Promise.resolve(mockSupabase),
}))
const mockCreateInvoiceCashEntry = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/invoice-entries', () => ({
createInvoiceCashEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockCreateInvoiceCashEntry(...args),
getRevenueAccount: vi.fn().mockReturnValue('3001'),
getOutputVatAccount: vi.fn().mockReturnValue('2611'),
}))
const mockReverseEntry = vi.fn()
const mockFindFiscalPeriod = vi.fn()
const mockCreateJournalEntry = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine', () => ({
reverseEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockReverseEntry(...args),
findFiscalPeriod: (...args: unknown[]) => mockFindFiscalPeriod(...args),
createJournalEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockCreateJournalEntry(...args),
}))
const mockFetchExchangeRate = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/currency/riksbanken', () => ({
fetchExchangeRate: (...args: unknown[]) => mockFetchExchangeRate(...args),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/invoices/match-log', () => ({
logMatchEvent: vi.fn(),
}))
const mockDetectDuplicate = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/invoices/duplicate-payment-detection', () => ({
detectDuplicatePaymentVoucher: (...args: unknown[]) => mockDetectDuplicate(...args),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/events/bus', () => ({
eventBus: { emit: vi.fn() },
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({
ensureInitialized: vi.fn(),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
requireWritePermission: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true }),
}))
import { POST } from '../route'
// Mocked above: imported here as a spy handle to assert FX rate provenance
// lands in the audit trail (PR #615 review).
import { logMatchEvent } from '@/lib/invoices/match-log'
const VALID_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000'
const VALID_UUID_2 = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440001'
const CANDIDATE_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440003'
const STALE_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440004'
const OTHER_CANDIDATE_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440005'
describe('POST /api/transactions/[id]/match-invoice', () => {
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
reset()
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
// Default to no soft-duplicate detected: happy-path tests don't care.
mockDetectDuplicate.mockResolvedValue(null)
// Clearing path delegates to findFiscalPeriod + createJournalEntry (FX fix
// PR #614 round 6: see lib/bookkeeping/invoice-payment-lines.ts). Give
// both safe defaults; tests that exercise the clearing path override
// mockCreateJournalEntry to assert the result id.
mockFindFiscalPeriod.mockResolvedValue('fp-1')
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
})
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null } })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
expect(status).toBe(401)
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Unauthorized' })
})
it('returns 400 when invoice_id is missing', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: {},
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect(body.error).toBe('Validation failed')
})
it('returns 404 when transaction not found', async () => {
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Not found' } })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-999/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-999' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(404)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('TX_CATEGORIZE_TX_NOT_FOUND')
})
it('returns 400 when transaction is an expense (amount <= 0)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500 })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_NOT_INCOME')
})
it('returns 400 when transaction is already linked to an invoice', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: 'inv-other' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_TX_ALREADY_LINKED')
})
it('returns 404 when invoice not found', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Not found' } })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID_2 },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(404)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_NOT_FOUND')
})
it('returns 400 when matching against a proforma (defense-in-depth)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null })
const proforma = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
document_type: 'proforma',
} as Parameters<typeof makeInvoice>[0])
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: proforma, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_NOT_INVOICE_TYPE')
})
it('returns 400 when invoice is not in unpaid state', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null })
const invoice = makeInvoice({ id: VALID_UUID, status: 'paid' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_NOT_OPEN')
})
it('cross-currency settlement: converts SEK tx via Riksbanken rate, posts FX-diff verifikat', async () => {
// 1000 SEK bank tx paying a 140 USD invoice. Spot rate today: 10.45.
// Conversion: 1000 / 10.45 = 95.6938 USD. Invoice was booked at 9.30,
// so 1510 credit = 95.6938 × 9.30 = 889.95. FX gain = 1000 − 889.95 =
// 110.05 → 3960 Cr. Invoice flips to partially_paid with remaining
// 140 − 95.6938 = 44.3062 USD.
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: 1000,
invoice_id: null,
currency: 'SEK',
date: '2026-05-30',
})
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'USD',
exchange_rate: 9.3,
total: 140,
remaining_amount: 140,
paid_amount: 0,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockFetchExchangeRate.mockResolvedValue({
currency: 'USD',
rate: 10.45,
date: '2026-05-30',
})
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-fx' })
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null }) // update invoice
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // logMatchEvent
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
success: boolean
invoice_status: string
paid_amount: number
remaining_amount: number
journal_entry_id: string
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.invoice_status).toBe('partially_paid')
// 2dp precision matches the invoice currency's natural precision (USD
// is to cent). The internal paidInInvoiceCurrency is computed at 4dp
// for FX-rate accuracy then rounded to 2dp when accumulated into the
// invoice column.
expect(body.paid_amount).toBeCloseTo(95.69, 1)
expect(body.remaining_amount).toBeCloseTo(44.31, 1)
// Verifikat: Dr 1930 1000, Cr 1510 889.95 (95.6938 × 9.30 ≈ 889.95),
// Cr 3960 110.05 (gain). Balances to öre.
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'company-1',
'user-1',
expect.objectContaining({
source_type: 'invoice_paid',
lines: expect.arrayContaining([
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 1000 }),
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '1510' }),
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '3960' }),
]),
}),
)
// The auto path records the rate provenance as 'riksbanken' (vs 'manual').
expect(logMatchEvent).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'user-1',
'tx-1',
'matched',
expect.objectContaining({
newState: expect.objectContaining({ rate_source: 'riksbanken', exchange_rate: 10.45 }),
}),
)
})
it('cross-currency settlement: returns 400 FX_RATE_UNAVAILABLE when Riksbanken fails and no manual rate', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 1000, invoice_id: null, currency: 'SEK', date: '2026-05-30' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'USD',
exchange_rate: 9.3,
total: 140,
remaining_amount: 140,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
mockFetchExchangeRate.mockResolvedValue(null) // Riksbanken outage
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_FX_RATE_UNAVAILABLE')
})
it('cross-currency settlement: manual_exchange_rate succeeds when Riksbanken fails', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 1000, invoice_id: null, currency: 'SEK', date: '2026-05-30' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
currency: 'USD',
exchange_rate: 9.3,
total: 140,
remaining_amount: 140,
paid_amount: 0,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockFetchExchangeRate.mockResolvedValue(null) // Riksbanken down: manual rate used instead
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-fx-manual' })
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID, manual_exchange_rate: 10.5 },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
// Manual rate skips the Riksbanken lookup: confirm by inspecting that
// mockCreateJournalEntry got the FX-computed line set (1000 / 10.5 =
// 95.2381 USD; arSek = 95.2381 × 9.30 = 885.71). Skipping Riksbanken is
// intentional: when the user types a rate from their bank statement we
// honour it rather than overriding with a possibly-stale Riksbanken value.
expect(mockFetchExchangeRate).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalled()
// Provenance: the manual override is recorded in the audit trail's
// new_state so it's distinguishable from an automatic Riksbanken lookup.
expect(logMatchEvent).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'user-1',
'tx-1',
'matched',
expect.objectContaining({
newState: expect.objectContaining({ rate_source: 'manual', exchange_rate: 10.5 }),
}),
)
})
it('matches transaction to invoice with accrual method (full payment)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null, date: '2024-06-15' })
const customer = makeCustomer()
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
subtotal: 10000,
vat_amount: 2500,
invoice_number: 'F-2024001',
customer,
})
// Fetch transaction
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
// Fetch invoice
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
// Hard-duplicate check: no prior payment voucher for this invoice
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
// Fetch company settings
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
// Update invoice (optimistic lock returns updated row)
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
// Insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// Update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// logMatchEvent insert (fire-and-forget)
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
success: boolean
invoice_status: string
paid_amount: number
remaining_amount: number
journal_entry_id: string
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.invoice_status).toBe('paid')
expect(body.paid_amount).toBe(12500)
expect(body.remaining_amount).toBe(0)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-1')
// Clearing path now builds lines via buildInvoicePaymentClearingLines and
// posts via createJournalEntry directly (FX fix PR #614 round 6). For a
// same-currency SEK invoice that's two lines: Dr 1930 12 500 / Cr 1510
// 12 500, no FX-diff line.
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'company-1',
'user-1',
expect.objectContaining({
fiscal_period_id: 'fp-1',
entry_date: '2024-06-15',
source_type: 'invoice_paid',
source_id: VALID_UUID,
lines: expect.arrayContaining([
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 12500 }),
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '1510', credit_amount: 12500 }),
]),
}),
)
})
it('stornos conflicting journal entry before matching', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: 12500,
invoice_id: null,
journal_entry_id: 'je-conflict',
date: '2024-06-15',
})
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
})
// Fetch transaction
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
// Fetch invoice
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
// Hard-duplicate check: no prior payment voucher for this invoice
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
mockReverseEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-storno' })
// Clear journal_entry_id on transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// logMatchEvent for storno
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// Fetch company settings
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-payment' })
// Update invoice (optimistic lock)
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
// Insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// Update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// logMatchEvent for match
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean; journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-payment')
expect(mockReverseEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), 'company-1', 'user-1', 'je-conflict')
})
it('returns 500 when storno fails: no partial state change', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: 12500,
invoice_id: null,
journal_entry_id: 'je-conflict',
})
const invoice = makeInvoice({ id: VALID_UUID, status: 'sent', remaining_amount: 12500 })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
// Hard-duplicate check: no prior payment voucher
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
mockReverseEntry.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Period locked'))
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(500)
// Storno failures bubble up through the bookkeeping engine; the wrapper
// routes any non-typed error to INTERNAL_ERROR.
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('INTERNAL_ERROR')
// Invoice should NOT have been updated: no further DB calls after storno failure
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('supports partial payment (partially_paid status)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 5000, invoice_id: null, date: '2024-06-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
paid_amount: 0,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-partial' })
// Update invoice (optimistic lock)
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
// Insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// Update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// logMatchEvent
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
success: boolean
invoice_status: string
paid_amount: number
remaining_amount: number
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.invoice_status).toBe('partially_paid')
expect(body.paid_amount).toBe(5000)
expect(body.remaining_amount).toBe(7500)
})
it('cash method ignores cash entry when invoice was already booked (accrual→cash migration)', async () => {
// Regression: customer sent invoices under accrual (1510 was debited on
// send), then switched to kontantmetoden before the bank receipt arrived.
// Old logic posted createInvoiceCashEntry: orphaning 1510 and double-
// counting revenue + VAT. Fix: route on invoice.journal_entry_id, not on
// the current accounting_method setting.
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null, date: '2024-06-15' })
const invoice = {
...makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
paid_amount: 0,
}),
// journal_entry_id lives on the DB column but not the TS Invoice type;
// attach via spread so the test row mirrors a real accrual-booked
// invoice the matcher will read.
journal_entry_id: 'je-send-on-accrual',
}
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-clearing' })
// Route order: PDF re-attach (runs first when invoice.journal_entry_id is
// set; null result skips the attach insert) → optimistic invoice update →
// invoice_payments → update transaction → logMatchEvent.
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // document_attachments lookup
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null }) // update invoice
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // logMatchEvent
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ invoice_status: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.invoice_status).toBe('paid')
// Must clear 1510 via the clearing-entry path, not re-recognise revenue +
// VAT via createInvoiceCashEntry.
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(mockCreateInvoiceCashEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
// Settlement-account resolution (customer-invoice counterpart of the
// supplier-side fix in match-supplier-invoice/route.ts): the bank leg must
// be resolved from THIS transaction's own cash_account_id, never hardcoded
// to 1930, so a receipt into a secondary/foreign-currency account books to
// that account.
describe('settlement account resolution', () => {
it('clearing entry: credits the transaction\'s own linked cash account, not 1930', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: 12500,
invoice_id: null,
date: '2024-06-15',
cash_account_id: 'ca-1940',
})
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
subtotal: 10000,
vat_amount: 2500,
invoice_number: 'F-2024001',
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // transactions
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null }) // invoices
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null }) // company_settings
enqueue({ data: { ledger_account: '1940' }, error: null }) // cash_accounts lookup
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1940' })
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null }) // update invoice
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // logMatchEvent
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-1940')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'company-1',
'user-1',
expect.objectContaining({
lines: expect.arrayContaining([
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '1940', debit_amount: 12500 }),
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '1510', credit_amount: 12500 }),
]),
}),
)
// The primary bank account must NOT appear on this verifikat.
const call = mockCreateJournalEntry.mock.calls[0][3] as { lines: Array<{ account_number: string }> }
expect(call.lines.some((l) => l.account_number === '1930')).toBe(false)
})
it('cash entry: passes the transaction\'s own linked cash account through to createInvoiceCashEntry', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: 12500,
invoice_id: null,
date: '2024-06-15',
cash_account_id: 'ca-1940',
})
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
paid_amount: 0,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
enqueue({ data: { ledger_account: '1940' }, error: null }) // cash_accounts lookup
mockCreateInvoiceCashEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-cash-1940' })
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null }) // update invoice
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // logMatchEvent
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-cash-1940')
expect(mockCreateInvoiceCashEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'company-1',
'user-1',
expect.anything(),
'2024-06-15',
'enskild_firma',
undefined,
'1940',
)
})
it('falls back to 1930 when the transaction has no linked cash account', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: 12500,
invoice_id: null,
date: '2024-06-15',
cash_account_id: null,
})
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
// No cash_accounts enqueue: resolveSettlementAccount short-circuits to
// '1930' when cash_account_id is null, with no DB call.
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-default' })
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'company-1',
'user-1',
expect.objectContaining({
lines: expect.arrayContaining([
expect.objectContaining({ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 12500 }),
]),
}),
)
})
it('aborts with 500 BOOKKEEPING_DATABASE_ERROR (mutates nothing) when the cash_accounts lookup errors', async () => {
// Regression: an explicit cash_account_id almost certainly resolves to
// a non-1930 account, so a transient lookup failure must not silently
// degrade to 1930 -- the same misbooking risk this fix exists to close,
// just triggered by infra flakiness instead of a stale setting.
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: 12500,
invoice_id: null,
date: '2024-06-15',
cash_account_id: 'ca-broken',
})
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'connection reset' } }) // cash_accounts lookup errors
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(500)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('BOOKKEEPING_DATABASE_ERROR')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})
it('returns 400 MATCH_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING when tx amount exceeds invoice remaining', async () => {
// Tx is +12 000 SEK, invoice has 5 000 SEK remaining. Legacy code path
// would push paid_amount past invoice.total; the new guard rejects so
// the user routes the excess through the split-payment flow.
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12000, invoice_id: null, date: '2024-06-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'partially_paid',
total: 10000,
remaining_amount: 5000,
paid_amount: 5000,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
// Hard-duplicate check is skipped for partially_paid status: no enqueue needed.
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: unknown }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe(
'MATCH_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING',
)
const details = (body.error as unknown as { details: Record<string, number> }).details
expect(details.transaction_amount).toBe(12000)
expect(details.remaining_amount).toBe(5000)
expect(details.excess).toBe(7000)
})
it('cash method partial payment uses clearing entry with note', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 5000, invoice_id: null, date: '2024-06-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
paid_amount: 0,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-clearing' })
// Update invoice
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
// Insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// Update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// logMatchEvent
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ invoice_status: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.invoice_status).toBe('partially_paid')
// Cash partial uses accrual-style clearing entry (now via the shared
// helper + createJournalEntry), NOT createInvoiceCashEntry.
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(mockCreateInvoiceCashEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('returns 409 when invoice is fully paid (optimistic lock)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
// Optimistic lock returns 0 rows (another request fully paid it)
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_ALREADY_PAID')
})
it('returns 409 on duplicate invoice_payment (unique constraint)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
// Optimistic lock succeeds
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
// invoice_payments insert fails with unique constraint violation
enqueue({ data: null, error: { code: '23505', message: 'duplicate' } })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_DUPLICATE_PAYMENT')
})
it('returns success with journal_entry_error when journal entry fails (non-blocking)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null, date: '2024-06-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({ id: VALID_UUID, status: 'sent', total: 12500, remaining_amount: 12500 })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Period locked'))
// Update invoice (optimistic lock)
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null })
// Insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// Update transaction
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
// logMatchEvent
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
success: boolean
journal_entry_id: null
journal_entry_error: string
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBeNull()
expect(body.journal_entry_error).toBe('Period locked')
})
// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// Duplicate-payment guards (Phase A4)
// ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
it('returns 409 MATCH_INVOICE_ALREADY_HAS_PAYMENT_VOUCHER when a payment row already links a JE for a sent invoice', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 12500, invoice_id: null })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 12500,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
// Hard-duplicate check returns a row pointing at the existing JE
enqueue({ data: [{ journal_entry_id: 'je-existing' }], error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string; details?: { existing_journal_entry_id?: string } } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_ALREADY_HAS_PAYMENT_VOUCHER')
expect(body.error.details?.existing_journal_entry_id).toBe('je-existing')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('does NOT run hard-duplicate guard for partially_paid invoices (legitimate additional payment)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 2500, invoice_id: null, date: '2024-06-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'partially_paid',
total: 12500,
remaining_amount: 2500,
paid_amount: 10000,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
// Hard-duplicate check is skipped for partially_paid; jump straight to settings
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-partial-extra' })
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null }) // update invoice
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update tx
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // logMatchEvent
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean; invoice_status: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.invoice_status).toBe('paid')
})
it('returns 409 MATCH_INVOICE_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE when the soft-duplicate detector finds a manual voucher', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 1000, invoice_id: null, date: '2026-05-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({ id: VALID_UUID, status: 'sent', total: 1000, remaining_amount: 1000 })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check: clean
mockDetectDuplicate.mockResolvedValueOnce({
journal_entry_id: 'je-manual',
voucher_label: 'A12',
entry_date: '2026-05-15',
description: 'Inbetalning faktura',
amount: 1000,
bank_account_number: '1930',
reason: 'exact_amount_same_date',
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
error: { code: string; details?: { candidate?: { journal_entry_id: string; voucher_label: string } } }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE')
expect(body.error.details?.candidate?.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-manual')
expect(body.error.details?.candidate?.voucher_label).toBe('A12')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('force=true bypasses the soft-duplicate guard when the candidate echo matches', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 1000, invoice_id: null, date: '2026-05-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({
id: VALID_UUID,
status: 'sent',
total: 1000,
remaining_amount: 1000,
invoice_number: 'F-2024099',
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check: clean
// force=true re-detects the candidate to verify the echoed id matches.
mockDetectDuplicate.mockResolvedValueOnce({
journal_entry_id: CANDIDATE_UUID,
voucher_label: 'A12',
entry_date: '2026-05-15',
description: 'Inbetalning faktura',
amount: 1000,
bank_account_number: '1930',
reason: 'exact_amount_same_date',
})
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-forced' })
enqueue({ data: [{ id: VALID_UUID }], error: null }) // update invoice
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // insert invoice_payments
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update tx
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // logMatchEvent
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID, force: true, expected_journal_entry_id: CANDIDATE_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean; journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-forced')
expect(mockDetectDuplicate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
it('returns 400 when force=true is sent without expected_journal_entry_id', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID, force: true },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
// Refusal happens at the schema layer (refine) before any DB work.
expect(status).toBe(400)
})
it('returns 409 MATCH_INVOICE_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH when the echoed candidate no longer matches', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 1000, invoice_id: null, date: '2026-05-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({ id: VALID_UUID, status: 'sent', total: 1000, remaining_amount: 1000 })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check: clean
// Re-detection returns a different candidate than the caller echoed.
mockDetectDuplicate.mockResolvedValueOnce({
journal_entry_id: OTHER_CANDIDATE_UUID,
voucher_label: 'A99',
entry_date: '2026-05-15',
description: 'Annan verifikation',
amount: 1000,
bank_account_number: '1930',
reason: 'exact_amount_same_date',
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID, force: true, expected_journal_entry_id: STALE_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
error: { code: string; details?: { expected_journal_entry_id?: string; detected_journal_entry_id?: string } }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH')
expect(body.error.details?.expected_journal_entry_id).toBe(STALE_UUID)
expect(body.error.details?.detected_journal_entry_id).toBe(OTHER_CANDIDATE_UUID)
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('returns 409 MATCH_INVOICE_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH when no current duplicate exists for the force call', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 1000, invoice_id: null, date: '2026-05-15' })
const invoice = makeInvoice({ id: VALID_UUID, status: 'sent', total: 1000, remaining_amount: 1000 })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // hard-duplicate check: clean
// Detection returns null: the duplicate the caller saw has resolved.
mockDetectDuplicate.mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/match-invoice', {
method: 'POST',
body: { invoice_id: VALID_UUID, force: true, expected_journal_entry_id: STALE_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('MATCH_INVOICE_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
})