Files
accounted/extensions/general/inbox-smart-match/lib/process-match.ts
T
Jakob WennbergandClaude Opus 4.6 dd920355b3 fix: use service-role client for processing_history writes (#289)
appendProcessingHistory was accepting a caller-provided SupabaseClient,
but processing_history has no INSERT RLS policy (by design — audit trail
writes should not be user-controllable). Extension handlers pass the
authenticated user client (ctx.supabase), which caused silent RLS
violations caught by try-catch — the audit trail was wired up but empty.

Switch to creating a service-role client internally, matching the
existing event_log pattern (event-log-handler.ts uses
createServiceClientNoCookies). Remove the supabase parameter from both
appendProcessingHistory and appendProcessingHistoryBatch. Update all
5 call sites in invoice-inbox and inbox-smart-match.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-21 09:20:12 +02:00

213 lines
7.1 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* Core matching flow — deterministic narrowing + LLM call + persistence +
* processing_history audit events. Called from both the classify handler and
* the transaction-sync retroactive handler.
*/
import type { SupabaseClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
import type { InvoiceInboxItem, ReceiptExtractionResult } from '@/types'
import { appendProcessingHistory } from '@/lib/processing-history/append'
import { fetchCandidateTransactions } from './fetch-candidates'
import { matchReceiptToCandidate } from './match-receipt'
export interface MatchContext {
supabase: SupabaseClient
companyId: string
userId: string
extensionId: string
triggerReason: 'classified' | 'transaction_synced'
}
export interface MatchOutcome {
status: 'matched' | 'no_match' | 'pending_transaction' | 'skipped'
transactionId: string | null
confidence: number
reasoning: string
}
/**
* Process a single classified-receipt inbox item through the matcher pipeline.
* Writes match fields + appends processing_history. Swallows internal errors
* so one failing receipt doesn't break the whole event handler.
*/
export async function processInboxItemMatch(
ctx: MatchContext,
item: InvoiceInboxItem
): Promise<MatchOutcome> {
const tag = `[inbox-smart-match] item=${item.id} trigger=${ctx.triggerReason}`
// We only operate on receipts for v1
if (item.document_type !== 'receipt') {
return { status: 'skipped', transactionId: null, confidence: 0, reasoning: '' }
}
if (item.status !== 'ready') {
return { status: 'skipped', transactionId: null, confidence: 0, reasoning: '' }
}
if (!item.extracted_data) {
return { status: 'skipped', transactionId: null, confidence: 0, reasoning: '' }
}
const correlationId = item.correlation_id ?? crypto.randomUUID()
// If we just minted a fresh correlation_id (legacy row predating the column),
// persist it so retries reuse the same thread through processing_history.
if (!item.correlation_id) {
const { error: corrError } = await ctx.supabase
.from('invoice_inbox_items')
.update({ correlation_id: correlationId })
.eq('id', item.id)
if (corrError) {
console.error(`${tag} — failed to persist correlation_id:`, corrError)
// non-fatal — we still proceed with matching under the in-memory ID
}
}
const extracted = item.extracted_data as unknown as ReceiptExtractionResult
const candidates = await fetchCandidateTransactions(ctx.supabase, ctx.companyId, extracted)
// Append DeterministicMatch event — records that the narrowing ran
let deterministicEventId: string
try {
deterministicEventId = await appendProcessingHistory({
companyId: ctx.companyId,
correlationId,
aggregateType: 'MatchProposal',
aggregateId: item.id,
eventType: 'MatchAttemptedDeterministic',
payload: {
inbox_item_id: item.id,
candidate_count: candidates.length,
candidate_ids: candidates.map((c) => c.id),
window_days: 7,
trigger: ctx.triggerReason,
},
actor: { type: 'system', id: ctx.extensionId },
occurredAt: new Date(),
})
} catch (err) {
console.error(`${tag} — failed to append MatchAttemptedDeterministic:`, err)
return { status: 'no_match', transactionId: null, confidence: 0, reasoning: '' }
}
// No candidates → mark pending, wait for bank sync
if (candidates.length === 0) {
await ctx.supabase
.from('invoice_inbox_items')
.update({
match_method: 'pending_transaction',
match_confidence: null,
matched_transaction_id: null,
match_reasoning: 'Inväntar matchande banktransaktion',
})
.eq('id', item.id)
return {
status: 'pending_transaction',
transactionId: null,
confidence: 0,
reasoning: 'Inväntar matchande banktransaktion',
}
}
// LLM chooses among candidates
let llm
try {
llm = await matchReceiptToCandidate({ extracted, candidates })
} catch (err) {
console.error(`${tag} — LLM matcher failed:`, err)
// Don't overwrite existing state on LLM failure; just log and exit
return { status: 'no_match', transactionId: null, confidence: 0, reasoning: '' }
}
// Record the LLM attempt in processing_history
try {
await appendProcessingHistory({
companyId: ctx.companyId,
correlationId,
causationId: deterministicEventId,
aggregateType: 'MatchProposal',
aggregateId: item.id,
eventType: 'MatchAttemptedLlm',
payload: {
inbox_item_id: item.id,
matched: llm.matched,
chosen_transaction_id: llm.transactionId,
confidence: llm.confidence,
llm_input_tokens: llm.usage.inputTokens,
llm_output_tokens: llm.usage.outputTokens,
candidate_count: candidates.length,
},
actor: { type: 'llm', id: 'match_receipt' },
occurredAt: new Date(),
})
} catch (err) {
console.error(`${tag} — failed to append MatchAttemptedLlm:`, err)
}
// Persist match. The (company_id, matched_transaction_id) partial unique
// index means a concurrent second inbox item trying to claim the same
// transaction will get a 23505 — we catch that and downgrade this one
// to pending_transaction instead of overwriting the winner.
if (llm.matched && llm.transactionId) {
const { error: updateError } = await ctx.supabase
.from('invoice_inbox_items')
.update({
matched_transaction_id: llm.transactionId,
match_confidence: llm.confidence,
match_method: 'llm',
match_reasoning: llm.reasoning,
})
.eq('id', item.id)
if (updateError) {
const code = (updateError as { code?: string }).code
if (code === '23505') {
// Another receipt won the race for this transaction.
await ctx.supabase
.from('invoice_inbox_items')
.update({
matched_transaction_id: null,
match_method: 'pending_transaction',
match_confidence: null,
match_reasoning: 'Transaktionen matchades först till ett annat kvitto',
})
.eq('id', item.id)
return {
status: 'pending_transaction',
transactionId: null,
confidence: 0,
reasoning: 'Transaktionen matchades först till ett annat kvitto',
}
}
console.error(`${tag} — failed to persist match:`, updateError)
return { status: 'no_match', transactionId: null, confidence: 0, reasoning: '' }
}
return {
status: 'matched',
transactionId: llm.transactionId,
confidence: llm.confidence,
reasoning: llm.reasoning,
}
}
// LLM said no match among the candidates — record explanatory reasoning
await ctx.supabase
.from('invoice_inbox_items')
.update({
matched_transaction_id: null,
match_confidence: llm.confidence,
match_method: 'pending_transaction',
match_reasoning: llm.reasoning || 'AI kunde inte hitta matchande transaktion bland kandidaterna',
})
.eq('id', item.id)
return {
status: 'no_match',
transactionId: null,
confidence: llm.confidence,
reasoning: llm.reasoning,
}
}