Files
accounted/extensions/general/mcp-server/__tests__/categorize-account-override.test.ts
T
MattssonandClaude Fable 5 fbe4e18730 feat(mcp): book on custom accounts via account_override; fix kontoplan settings link (#1608)
* feat(mcp): book on custom accounts via account_override; fix kontoplan settings link

gnubok_categorize_transaction only spoke a 19-category enum mapping to 21
hardcoded BAS accounts, so company-custom accounts (e.g. VMB) were
unreachable from the agent surface even when active in the chart.

- add account_override to gnubok_categorize_transaction with v1 REST
  semantics via a shared helper (lib/bookkeeping/account-override.ts):
  business-side replacement, class-2 auto-VAT drop with the 2610-2649
  moms-line exception, plus a same-account degenerate guard; validated at
  staging and re-validated at commit
- align the gnubok_create_voucher staging gate with the engine's seeding
  semantics: BAS 2026 accounts merely absent from the chart pass (the
  engine backfills them at commit) and the preview lists
  will_activate_accounts with BAS-name fallback; non-BAS unknown and
  inactive accounts still rejected
- stop suggest_categories silently dropping mapping rules whose account
  is outside the fixed category maps; they surface with the rule's own
  account and an explanatory match_reason
- correct the create_account next-step hint (categorize could never use
  the new account before; now true via account_override)
- point the settings "Kontoplan (BAS)" link at /chart-of-accounts and
  redirect the orphaned /bookkeeping?tab=accounts URL (tab removed in
  #850; the deep link never worked after the #854 merge collision)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(mcp): address review findings on account_override

- commit executor rejects a present-but-malformed stored account_override
  loudly instead of degrading to the category default (CodeRabbit major;
  the approver approved a preview showing the override account); with
  commitPendingOperation regression tests
- accountToCategory returns null for unknown income accounts so custom
  income accounts get the same diagnostic as expenses (CodeRabbit minor),
  with income + reason-accumulation tests (CodeRabbit nit)
- pin the class-2 VAT-drop balance invariant with a test through
  buildTransactionEntryLines (Swedish compliance review: gross booking,
  never an unbalanced net + missing VAT leg)
- account_override description asks the agent to state the actual
  affärshändelse in notes when overriding (BFL 5 kap description concern)
- eventBus.clear() in the two new test suites (CodeRabbit minor)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(mcp): never guess a moms leg onto an account_override without explicit VAT intent

Round-2 Swedish compliance finding: the class-2 VAT drop did not cover
margin-scheme (VMB) accounts in class 3/4, which are the override's
flagship use case, so a forgotten vat_treatment attached the category
default standard_25 and booked an ingående-moms deduction on a
transaction where input VAT is not deductible (ML 2023:200).

applyAccountOverride now takes explicit VAT intent (vat_treatment or
vat_amount present) and books GROSS with no auto-VAT line without it:
forgetting the flag under-deducts (lawful), never over-deducts. Both
call sites (MCP staging preview, commit core) derive the flag the same
way; the tool description states the enforced behavior. Deliberate
divergence from v1 REST recorded in DECISIONS.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore: move stray decision-log entry to the root DECISIONS.md

The round-2 entry was appended from the wrong working directory and
landed as lib/bookkeeping/__tests__/DECISIONS.md.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-14 01:24:48 +02:00

176 lines
6.3 KiB
TypeScript

/**
* gnubok_categorize_transaction: the account_override parameter.
*
* Custom accounts (e.g. VMB accounts like 4020) are outside the fixed
* category → account maps, so account_override is the ONLY path by which the
* MCP categorize surface can book on them. These tests pin:
* - staging-time validation (unknown / inactive / malformed / private),
* - the override landing in both the staged params (for the commit
* executor) and the preview (for the approver),
* Companion suites:
* - lib/bookkeeping/__tests__/account-override.test.ts (the shared helper)
* - lib/transactions/__tests__/categorize-core.override.test.ts (commit path)
*/
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import { createQueuedMockSupabase } from '@/tests/helpers'
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events'
const mockDetectDup = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/transactions/booking-duplicate-detection', () => ({
detectBookingDuplicate: (...args: unknown[]) => mockDetectDup(...args),
}))
import { tools } from '../server'
const categorize = tools.find((t) => t.name === 'gnubok_categorize_transaction')!
const TX_ID = '00000000-0000-4000-8000-0000000000bb'
/** `transactions` row for categorizeTransactionCore's select('*'). Synthetic. */
const coreTxRow = (over: Record<string, unknown> = {}) => ({
id: TX_ID,
date: '2026-07-10',
amount: -479,
currency: 'SEK',
amount_sek: -479,
exchange_rate: 1,
description: 'SECOND HAND BUTIK',
merchant_name: null,
cash_account_id: null,
document_id: null,
journal_entry_id: null,
is_business: true,
...over,
})
/** The narrower projection the tool re-fetches for the guard + title. */
const guardTxRow = (over: Record<string, unknown> = {}) => ({
description: 'SECOND HAND BUTIK',
merchant_name: null,
amount: -479,
currency: 'SEK',
amount_sek: -479,
exchange_rate: 1,
date: '2026-07-10',
cash_account_id: null,
...over,
})
const settingsRow = { entity_type: 'aktiebolag', fiscal_year_start_month: 1 }
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
eventBus.clear()
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue(null)
})
describe('gnubok_categorize_transaction: account_override', () => {
it('declares account_override in the input schema with a 4-digit pattern', () => {
const schema = categorize.inputSchema as {
properties: { account_override?: { type: string; pattern?: string } }
required?: string[]
}
expect(schema.properties.account_override).toBeDefined()
expect(schema.properties.account_override?.type).toBe('string')
expect(schema.properties.account_override?.pattern).toBe('^\\d{4}$')
expect(schema.required ?? []).not.toContain('account_override')
})
it('rejects a malformed override before any DB work', async () => {
const { supabase } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
await expect(
categorize.execute(
{ transaction_id: TX_ID, category: 'expense_other', account_override: '40a0' },
'company-1',
'user-1',
supabase as never,
),
).rejects.toThrow(/4 digits/)
})
it('rejects at staging when the override account is not in the chart', async () => {
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
enqueue({ data: coreTxRow() }) // core: transactions
enqueue({ data: settingsRow }) // core: company_settings
enqueue({ data: null }) // applyAccountOverride: chart_of_accounts miss
await expect(
categorize.execute(
{ transaction_id: TX_ID, category: 'expense_other', account_override: '4020' },
'company-1',
'user-1',
supabase as never,
),
).rejects.toThrow(/finns inte i kontoplanen/)
})
it('rejects at staging when the override account is inactive', async () => {
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
enqueue({ data: coreTxRow() })
enqueue({ data: settingsRow })
enqueue({ data: { account_number: '4020', account_class: 4, is_active: false } })
await expect(
categorize.execute(
{ transaction_id: TX_ID, category: 'expense_other', account_override: '4020' },
'company-1',
'user-1',
supabase as never,
),
).rejects.toThrow(/inaktivt/)
})
it('rejects account_override combined with category "private"', async () => {
const { supabase, enqueue } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
enqueue({ data: coreTxRow() })
enqueue({ data: settingsRow })
await expect(
categorize.execute(
{ transaction_id: TX_ID, category: 'private', account_override: '4020' },
'company-1',
'user-1',
supabase as never,
),
).rejects.toThrow(/private/)
})
it('stages with the override in params AND preview when the account is active', async () => {
const { supabase, enqueue, findCall } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
enqueue({ data: coreTxRow() }) // core: transactions
enqueue({ data: settingsRow }) // core: company_settings
enqueue({ data: { account_number: '4020', account_class: 4, is_active: true } }) // override chart hit
enqueue({ data: guardTxRow() }) // tool: transactions re-fetch
enqueue({ data: null }) // resolvePeriodStatusForDate: company_settings
enqueue({ data: null }) // resolvePeriodStatusForDate: fiscal_periods
enqueue({ data: { id: 'op-override-1' } }) // pending_operations insert
const result = (await categorize.execute(
{
transaction_id: TX_ID,
category: 'expense_other',
vat_treatment: 'exempt',
account_override: '4020',
},
'company-1',
'user-1',
supabase as never,
{ type: 'api_key' },
)) as { staged: boolean; operation_id?: string; preview: Record<string, unknown> }
expect(result.staged).toBe(true)
expect(result.operation_id).toBe('op-override-1')
// The preview must show the account that will actually be posted, not the
// category default (6991 for expense_other).
expect(result.preview.debit_account).toBe('4020')
expect(result.preview.account_override).toBe('4020')
// The staged params must carry the override so the commit executor books
// on it after approval.
const insertArgs = findCall('pending_operations', 'insert')
expect(insertArgs).toBeDefined()
const payload = (insertArgs as unknown[])[0] as { params?: { account_override?: string | null } }
expect(payload.params?.account_override).toBe('4020')
})
})