* feat(supplier-invoices): sarskild loneskatt (SLP) pair on pension premium lines Booking a tjanstepension invoice (e.g. Avanza) needs the buyer's own SLP beyond the payable: debit 7533 / credit 2514 at 24.26% of the premium (SLF 1991:687). The item-based debit-only form could not express the self-balancing pair, so users had to hand-edit the verifikat. - new leaf module lib/bookkeeping/slp-lines.ts: SLP_RATE (single source, re-exported by the bokslut calculator), isSlpPensionAccount (741x), generateSlpLines (7533 D / 2514 K, nets to zero) - migration adds supplier_invoice_items.apply_slp boolean default false - registration, cash, and privately-paid generators inject the pair for flagged 741x items, mirroring the reverse-charge injection; the balance guarantees keep 2440/1930/2893 at exactly the invoice total; the credit note generator reverses the pair (7533 K / 2514 D) - privately-paid balance guarantee now subtracts existing credits so the SLP 2514 leg never inflates the owner account - schema field apply_slp + guards in all create paths (main route, inbox convert, v1 REST, pending-operations executor): 400 SI_CREATE_SLP_INVALID_ACCOUNT on non-741x accounts, 400 SI_CREATE_SLP_ACCRUAL combined with periodisering - form: advisory hint on unflagged 741x rows with one-click opt-in and a quiet confirmation line when applied; totals box untouched (the invoice total stays the payable); AB review preview injects the same pair via the same generator for parity - year-end double-count guard: calculateSarskildLoneskatt subtracts SLP already posted to 7533 during the year (floored at zero) so bokslut never provisions flagged premiums twice Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(api-skill): regenerate suppliers reference for apply_slp The apiskill:check CI gate requires the generated accounted-api skill to stay in sync with the endpoint registry after the apply_slp addition. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(slp): carry apply_slp through v1 routes, MCP staging, preview and credit reversal Review findings on the SLP PR: - v1 credit route: SI_FULL_COLUMNS now projects items.apply_slp, so createSupplierCreditNoteEntry sees the flag and reverses the 7533/2514 pair booked at registration (it previously stood forever and the year-end netting under-provisioned). The flag is also copied onto the created credit-note items for parity with the web credit route. - v1 mark-paid: the items sub-select now includes apply_slp, so a kontantmetoden payment via v1 books the cash entry WITH the SLP pair, matching the web mark-paid. - v1 GET ?expand=items: SI_ITEM_COLUMNS includes apply_slp so the flag is readable back through the public API. - credit-note SLP base is abs of the SIGNED sum of flagged line_totals, not per-item abs: a mixed-sign flagged original (+10000/-2000) booked SLP on 8000 at registration and now reverses exactly that, not 12000. The expense-bucket per-item abs convention is untouched. - kontantmetod bank-match preview appends the same generateSlpLines pair the POST books, so the approved lines equal the committed lines. - MCP gnubok_create_supplier_invoice_from_inbox: line_overrides accepts apply_slp (optional boolean), plumbs it into the staged operation's items, and rejects non-741x resolved accounts at staging time with the bilingual SI_CREATE_SLP_INVALID_ACCOUNT texts. - DECISIONS.md: five entries for today's decisions. Every behavioral fix has a test verified to fail without it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1265 lines
45 KiB
TypeScript
1265 lines
45 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach, afterEach } from 'vitest'
|
||
import {
|
||
createMockRequest,
|
||
parseJsonResponse,
|
||
createQueuedMockSupabase,
|
||
makeSupplierInvoice,
|
||
makeSupplier,
|
||
} from '@/tests/helpers'
|
||
|
||
const { supabase: mockSupabase, enqueue, reset, findCall } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/supabase/server', () => ({
|
||
createClient: () => Promise.resolve(mockSupabase),
|
||
}))
|
||
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({
|
||
ensureInitialized: vi.fn(),
|
||
}))
|
||
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
|
||
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
||
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
|
||
}))
|
||
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
|
||
requireWritePermission: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ ok: true }),
|
||
}))
|
||
|
||
const mockFindFiscalPeriod = vi.fn()
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine', () => ({
|
||
findFiscalPeriod: (...args: unknown[]) => mockFindFiscalPeriod(...args),
|
||
}))
|
||
|
||
const mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry = vi.fn()
|
||
const mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry = vi.fn()
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/supplier-invoice-entries', () => ({
|
||
createSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry: (...args: unknown[]) =>
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry(...args),
|
||
createSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry: (...args: unknown[]) =>
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry(...args),
|
||
}))
|
||
|
||
const mockLinkToJournalEntry = vi.fn()
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/core/documents/document-service', () => ({
|
||
linkToJournalEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockLinkToJournalEntry(...args),
|
||
}))
|
||
|
||
// Riksbanken is the only external dependency of the new server-side rate
|
||
// lookup. Spread the real module so anything else importing from it (e.g.
|
||
// convertToSEK) keeps working.
|
||
const mockFetchExchangeRate = vi.fn()
|
||
vi.mock('@/lib/currency/riksbanken', async () => {
|
||
const actual =
|
||
await vi.importActual<typeof import('@/lib/currency/riksbanken')>('@/lib/currency/riksbanken')
|
||
return { ...actual, fetchExchangeRate: (...args: unknown[]) => mockFetchExchangeRate(...args) }
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events'
|
||
|
||
import { GET, POST } from '../route'
|
||
|
||
describe('GET /api/supplier-invoices', () => {
|
||
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
|
||
|
||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||
reset()
|
||
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
|
||
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null } })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices')
|
||
const response = await GET(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(401)
|
||
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Unauthorized' })
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns supplier invoices list', async () => {
|
||
const invoices = [makeSupplierInvoice(), makeSupplierInvoice()]
|
||
enqueue({ data: invoices, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices')
|
||
const response = await GET(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: unknown[] }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(body.data).toEqual(invoices)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('applies status filter', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
searchParams: { status: 'registered' },
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await GET(request)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(mockSupabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('supplier_invoices')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('handles to_pay virtual status', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
searchParams: { status: 'to_pay' },
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await GET(request)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('applies supplier_id filter', async () => {
|
||
const invoices = [makeSupplierInvoice({ supplier_id: 'supplier-1' })]
|
||
enqueue({ data: invoices, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
searchParams: { status: 'all', supplier_id: 'supplier-1' },
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await GET(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ data: unknown[] }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(body.data).toEqual(invoices)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns 500 on database error', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'DB error' } })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices')
|
||
const response = await GET(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(500)
|
||
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('INTERNAL_ERROR')
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
const VALID_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000'
|
||
const VALID_UUID_2 = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440001'
|
||
const DOCUMENT_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440002'
|
||
|
||
describe('POST /api/supplier-invoices', () => {
|
||
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
|
||
|
||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||
reset()
|
||
eventBus.clear()
|
||
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
|
||
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: null } })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: { supplier_id: VALID_UUID, items: [] },
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(401)
|
||
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Unauthorized' })
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns 400 when vat_rate is percent-shaped (25 instead of 0.25, issue #310)', async () => {
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-PERCENT',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
// Percent-integer shape: used to be accepted and silently booked
|
||
// 2500 % VAT (line_total * 25).
|
||
{ description: 'Material', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '4010', vat_rate: 25 },
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
type: string
|
||
errors: Array<{ field: string; message: string }>
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(body.type).toBe('validation_error')
|
||
expect(body.errors.some((e) => e.field === 'items.0.vat_rate')).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns 404 when supplier not found', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Not found' } })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID_2,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-001',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Material', quantity: 1, unit_price: 8000, account_number: '4010' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(404)
|
||
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('SUPPLIER_NOT_FOUND')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('creates supplier invoice with items and arrival number', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-1' })
|
||
|
||
// Fetch supplier
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
// RPC get_next_arrival_number
|
||
enqueue({ data: 5 })
|
||
// Insert invoice
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
// Insert items
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
// Fetch company settings
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
|
||
// Update invoice with registration_journal_entry_id
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-001',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Material',
|
||
quantity: 10,
|
||
unit_price: 800,
|
||
account_number: '4010',
|
||
vat_rate: 0.25,
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
data: { registration_journal_entry_id: string }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(body.data).toBeTruthy()
|
||
expect(body.data.registration_journal_entry_id).toBe('je-1')
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('registers WITHOUT booking when defer_invoice_booking is on (#967)', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-deferred' })
|
||
|
||
// Fetch supplier
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
// RPC get_next_arrival_number
|
||
enqueue({ data: 5 })
|
||
// Insert invoice
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
// Insert items
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
// Fetch company settings: accrual + deferred booking
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual', defer_invoice_booking: true }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-002',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Material',
|
||
quantity: 10,
|
||
unit_price: 800,
|
||
account_number: '4010',
|
||
vat_rate: 0.25,
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
data: { registration_journal_entry_id: string | null }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(body.data).toBeTruthy()
|
||
// No registration verifikat: booking is a separate explicit step.
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
expect(body.data.registration_journal_entry_id ?? null).toBeNull()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('stores an uploaded document and links it to the registration entry', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-with-document', document_id: DOCUMENT_UUID })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: { id: DOCUMENT_UUID, journal_entry_id: null }, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 6 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null })
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-document' })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
mockLinkToJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: DOCUMENT_UUID })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
document_id: DOCUMENT_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-DOCUMENT',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{ description: 'Service', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '6200' },
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
data: { document_id: string; registration_journal_entry_id: string }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(body.data.document_id).toBe(DOCUMENT_UUID)
|
||
expect(body.data.registration_journal_entry_id).toBe('je-document')
|
||
expect(mockLinkToJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||
mockSupabase,
|
||
'company-1',
|
||
DOCUMENT_UUID,
|
||
'je-document',
|
||
)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rejects a document that is missing or outside the active company', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
document_id: DOCUMENT_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-INVALID-DOCUMENT',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{ description: 'Service', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '6200' },
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_INVALID_INPUT')
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
expect(mockLinkToJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('emits supplier_invoice.registered event', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-1' })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 5 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const emitSpy = vi.spyOn(eventBus, 'emit')
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-001',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{ description: 'Material', quantity: 10, unit_price: 800, account_number: '4010', vat_rate: 0.25 },
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(emitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||
expect.objectContaining({
|
||
type: 'supplier_invoice.registered',
|
||
payload: expect.objectContaining({ userId: 'user-1' }),
|
||
})
|
||
)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('skips registration entry for cash method', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-1' })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 6 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash' }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-002',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Service', quantity: 1, unit_price: 5000, account_number: '6200' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
data: { registration_journal_entry_id: null }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(body.data.registration_journal_entry_id).toBeNull()
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rolls back on items insertion failure', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-1' })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 7 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
// Items fail
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Items insert failed' } })
|
||
// Rollback delete
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-003',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Test', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '4010' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(500)
|
||
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('SI_CREATE_FAILED')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rolls back and returns SI_CREATE_NO_FISCAL_PERIOD when invoice_date is outside every fiscal period', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-1', invoice_date: '2099-06-01' })
|
||
|
||
// Fetch supplier
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
// RPC get_next_arrival_number
|
||
enqueue({ data: 9 })
|
||
// Insert invoice
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
// Insert items
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
// Fetch company settings → accrual, so a registration JE is attempted
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null })
|
||
// Engine returns null because no fiscal period covers 2099-06-01
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mockResolvedValue(null)
|
||
// Rollback: delete the orphan invoice (items cascade)
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-NOFY',
|
||
invoice_date: '2099-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2099-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Material', quantity: 1, unit_price: 8000, account_number: '4010' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_NO_FISCAL_PERIOD')
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
// The orphan must be rolled back: the delete is the 6th queued call.
|
||
expect(mockSupabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledWith('supplier_invoices')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns 409 with credit chain on duplicate supplier_invoice_number for credited original', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
|
||
// Fetch supplier
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
// RPC get_next_arrival_number
|
||
enqueue({ data: 8 })
|
||
// Insert invoice → unique-index violation
|
||
enqueue({
|
||
data: null,
|
||
error: {
|
||
code: '23505',
|
||
message:
|
||
'duplicate key value violates unique constraint "idx_supplier_invoices_company_supplier_number"',
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
// Lookup existing row
|
||
enqueue({
|
||
data: {
|
||
id: 'existing-1',
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-DUP',
|
||
status: 'credited',
|
||
},
|
||
error: null,
|
||
})
|
||
// Lookup credit note for the credited original
|
||
enqueue({ data: { id: 'credit-1' }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-DUP',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Test', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '4010' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
error: { code: string; details: { existing: { id: string; supplier_invoice_number: string; status: string; credit_note_id: string } } }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(409)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_NUMBER')
|
||
expect(body.error.details.existing).toEqual({
|
||
id: 'existing-1',
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-DUP',
|
||
status: 'credited',
|
||
credit_note_id: 'credit-1',
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns 409 without credit_note_id when existing invoice is not credited', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 9 })
|
||
enqueue({
|
||
data: null,
|
||
error: {
|
||
code: '23505',
|
||
message:
|
||
'duplicate key value violates unique constraint "idx_supplier_invoices_company_supplier_number"',
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
enqueue({
|
||
data: {
|
||
id: 'existing-2',
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-DUP-2',
|
||
status: 'approved',
|
||
},
|
||
error: null,
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-DUP-2',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Test', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '4010' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
error: { code: string; details: { existing: { id: string; status: string; credit_note_id: string | null } } }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(409)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_NUMBER')
|
||
expect(body.error.details.existing.status).toBe('approved')
|
||
expect(body.error.details.existing.credit_note_id).toBeNull()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('returns generic 409 when existing row lookup races to nothing', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 10 })
|
||
enqueue({
|
||
data: null,
|
||
error: {
|
||
code: '23505',
|
||
message:
|
||
'duplicate key value violates unique constraint "idx_supplier_invoices_company_supplier_number"',
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
// Lookup returns null: the row was deleted between the failing insert and our fetch
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-RACE',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Test', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '4010' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
error: { code: string; details?: { existing?: unknown } }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(409)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_NUMBER')
|
||
expect(body.error.details?.existing).toBeNull()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('falls through to 500 for non-23505 insert errors', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 11 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: { code: '23502', message: 'NOT NULL violation' } })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-OTHER',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Test', quantity: 1, unit_price: 1000, account_number: '4010' }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(500)
|
||
expect((body.error as unknown as { code: string }).code).toBe('SI_CREATE_FAILED')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('books privately-paid invoice via 2893 path for aktiebolag', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-priv-1', status: 'paid' })
|
||
|
||
// Fetch supplier
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
// Fetch company.entity_type (paidPrivately branch)
|
||
enqueue({ data: { entity_type: 'aktiebolag' }, error: null })
|
||
// RPC get_next_arrival_number
|
||
enqueue({ data: 12 })
|
||
// Insert invoice
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
// Insert items
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
// Fetch company settings
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-priv-1' })
|
||
// Update invoice with payment_journal_entry_id
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
// Insert supplier_invoice_payments row
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'KVITTO-001',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
paid_with_private_funds: true,
|
||
items: [
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Kontorsmaterial',
|
||
quantity: 1,
|
||
unit_price: 400,
|
||
account_number: '6110',
|
||
vat_rate: 0.25,
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
data: { payment_journal_entry_id: string; registration_journal_entry_id: null }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(body.data.payment_journal_entry_id).toBe('je-priv-1')
|
||
expect(body.data.registration_journal_entry_id).toBeNull()
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry).toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
// The classic registration path must NOT be touched.
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
const call = mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry.mock.calls[0]
|
||
expect(call[5]).toBe('aktiebolag')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('passes entity_type=enskild_firma so engine credits 2018', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-priv-2', status: 'paid' })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 13 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash' }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-priv-2' })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'KVITTO-002',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
paid_with_private_funds: true,
|
||
items: [
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Lunch klient',
|
||
quantity: 1,
|
||
unit_price: 200,
|
||
account_number: '5810',
|
||
vat_rate: 0.12,
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
const call = mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry.mock.calls[0]
|
||
expect(call[5]).toBe('enskild_firma')
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('persists manual vat_amount override on items and forwards it to the engine', async () => {
|
||
// Bilförmån-fallet: leverantören tar 25% moms men endast 50% är
|
||
// avdragsgill. Användaren skriver 1 250 kr i momsrutan i stället för
|
||
// den beräknade 2 500 kr.
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-1' })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 7 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null })
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LEAS-001',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Leasing personbil',
|
||
amount: 10000,
|
||
account_number: '5615',
|
||
vat_rate: 0.25,
|
||
vat_amount: 1250,
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
const items = mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mock.calls[0][4] as Array<{
|
||
vat_amount: number
|
||
vat_rate: number
|
||
line_total: number
|
||
}>
|
||
expect(items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||
expect(items[0].vat_amount).toBe(1250)
|
||
expect(items[0].vat_rate).toBe(0.25)
|
||
expect(items[0].line_total).toBe(10000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('falls back to line_total × rate when vat_amount is omitted', async () => {
|
||
const supplier = makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID })
|
||
const createdInvoice = makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-1' })
|
||
|
||
enqueue({ data: supplier, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 8 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: createdInvoice, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null })
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-1' })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-001',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Material',
|
||
amount: 10000,
|
||
account_number: '4010',
|
||
vat_rate: 0.25,
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
const items = mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mock.calls[0][4] as Array<{
|
||
vat_amount: number
|
||
}>
|
||
expect(items[0].vat_amount).toBe(2500)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rejects periodisering combined with reverse_charge', async () => {
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-RC-ACC',
|
||
invoice_date: '2026-01-01',
|
||
due_date: '2026-02-01',
|
||
reverse_charge: true,
|
||
items: [
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Licens 12 mån',
|
||
amount: 12000,
|
||
account_number: '6540',
|
||
vat_rate: 0,
|
||
accrual_period_start: '2026-01-01',
|
||
accrual_period_end: '2026-12-31',
|
||
},
|
||
],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_ACCRUAL_REVERSE_CHARGE')
|
||
// The guard must fire before anything is persisted or booked.
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rejects paid_with_private_funds combined with reverse_charge', async () => {
|
||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-RC',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
paid_with_private_funds: true,
|
||
reverse_charge: true,
|
||
items: [{ description: 'Service', quantity: 1, unit_price: 5000, account_number: '6540', vat_rate: 0.25 }],
|
||
},
|
||
})
|
||
const response = await POST(request)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_INVALID_INPUT')
|
||
// Make sure we never touched the engine paths.
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoicePrivatelyPaidEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ── Exchange rate + SEK amounts ─────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||
// The queued Supabase mock is a bare Proxy, so the only way to assert what was
|
||
// actually written is to record the argument handed to `.insert()`. The route
|
||
// echoes back the enqueued fixture row, not its own payload.
|
||
|
||
type InsertRecord = { table: string; payload: Record<string, unknown> }
|
||
|
||
function wrapCapturing(chain: unknown, table: string, sink: InsertRecord[]): unknown {
|
||
return new Proxy(
|
||
{},
|
||
{
|
||
get(_target, prop) {
|
||
const inner = (chain as Record<string | symbol, unknown>)[prop as string]
|
||
if (prop === 'then') return inner
|
||
return (...args: unknown[]) => {
|
||
if (
|
||
prop === 'insert' &&
|
||
args[0] &&
|
||
typeof args[0] === 'object' &&
|
||
!Array.isArray(args[0])
|
||
) {
|
||
sink.push({ table, payload: args[0] as Record<string, unknown> })
|
||
}
|
||
return wrapCapturing((inner as (...a: unknown[]) => unknown)(...args), table, sink)
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
describe('POST /api/supplier-invoices: exchange rate + SEK amounts', () => {
|
||
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
|
||
const captured: InsertRecord[] = []
|
||
let baseFrom: (...args: unknown[]) => unknown
|
||
|
||
const supplierInvoiceInsert = () =>
|
||
captured.find((c) => c.table === 'supplier_invoices')?.payload
|
||
|
||
function enqueueHappyPath() {
|
||
enqueue({ data: makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID }), error: null }) // supplier lookup
|
||
enqueue({ data: 7 }) // get_next_arrival_number
|
||
enqueue({ data: makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-fx' }), error: null }) // insert invoice
|
||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // insert items
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash' }, error: null }) // company_settings
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
function body(overrides: Record<string, unknown> = {}) {
|
||
return {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-FX',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items: [
|
||
{ description: 'Molntjänst', amount: 10000, account_number: '6540', vat_rate: 0.25 },
|
||
],
|
||
...overrides,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||
reset()
|
||
eventBus.clear()
|
||
captured.length = 0
|
||
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
||
mockFetchExchangeRate.mockReset()
|
||
baseFrom = mockSupabase.from.getMockImplementation() as (...args: unknown[]) => unknown
|
||
mockSupabase.from.mockImplementation((table: string) =>
|
||
wrapCapturing(baseFrom(table), table, captured),
|
||
)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
afterEach(() => {
|
||
mockSupabase.from.mockImplementation(baseFrom)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('populates total_sek for an ordinary SEK invoice and never asks for a rate', async () => {
|
||
enqueueHappyPath()
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', { method: 'POST', body: body() }),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
const payload = supplierInvoiceInsert()
|
||
expect(payload).toBeDefined()
|
||
// total_sek used to be NULL for every SEK invoice because the writer gated
|
||
// it on an exchange rate existing. A SEK invoice has none by definition.
|
||
expect(payload!.subtotal_sek).toBe(10000)
|
||
expect(payload!.vat_amount_sek).toBe(2500)
|
||
expect(payload!.total_sek).toBe(12500)
|
||
expect(payload!.total_sek).toBe(payload!.total)
|
||
expect(payload!.exchange_rate).toBeNull()
|
||
expect(payload!.exchange_rate_date).toBeNull()
|
||
expect(mockFetchExchangeRate).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('uses a caller-supplied rate for a foreign invoice without fetching', async () => {
|
||
enqueueHappyPath()
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: body({ currency: 'EUR', exchange_rate: 11.5 }),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
const payload = supplierInvoiceInsert()
|
||
expect(payload!.currency).toBe('EUR')
|
||
expect(payload!.exchange_rate).toBe(11.5)
|
||
expect(payload!.subtotal_sek).toBe(115000)
|
||
expect(payload!.vat_amount_sek).toBe(28750)
|
||
expect(payload!.total_sek).toBe(143750)
|
||
expect(mockFetchExchangeRate).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('fetches the invoice-date rate server-side when the caller omits one', async () => {
|
||
enqueueHappyPath()
|
||
mockFetchExchangeRate.mockResolvedValue({ currency: 'EUR', rate: 11.2, date: '2024-05-31' })
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: body({ currency: 'EUR' }),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(mockFetchExchangeRate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
||
const [currencyArg, dateArg, clientArg] = mockFetchExchangeRate.mock.calls[0]
|
||
expect(currencyArg).toBe('EUR')
|
||
expect((dateArg as Date).toISOString().slice(0, 10)).toBe('2024-06-01')
|
||
// The supabase client must be passed through: that is what makes the
|
||
// shared exchange_rates cache a read-through cache instead of dead weight.
|
||
expect(clientArg).toBe(mockSupabase)
|
||
|
||
const payload = supplierInvoiceInsert()
|
||
expect(payload!.exchange_rate).toBe(11.2)
|
||
// Observation date, not the requested date: Riksbanken publishes no rate
|
||
// on weekends and the lookback picks the previous banking day.
|
||
expect(payload!.exchange_rate_date).toBe('2024-05-31')
|
||
expect(payload!.total_sek).toBe(140000)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('refuses the create with SI_FX_RATE_MISSING when no rate can be resolved', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID }), error: null })
|
||
mockFetchExchangeRate.mockResolvedValue(null)
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: body({ currency: 'USD' }),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status, body: responseBody } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
error: { code: string; details?: { currency?: string; invoice_date?: string } }
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(responseBody.error.code).toBe('SI_FX_RATE_MISSING')
|
||
expect(responseBody.error.details?.currency).toBe('USD')
|
||
// Nothing may be persisted, no ankomstnummer burned, no verifikat posted:
|
||
// an unconverted row would only fail again inside the booking path.
|
||
expect(supplierInvoiceInsert()).toBeUndefined()
|
||
expect(mockSupabase.rpc).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// supplier_invoices_exchange_rate_check is `> 0 AND < 100000`. The schema
|
||
// used to have no ceiling, so 250000 sailed past validation, reached the
|
||
// constraint and came back to the user as an unexplained 500.
|
||
it('rejects an out-of-range exchange rate as a 400, not a constraint-violation 500', async () => {
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: body({ currency: 'EUR', exchange_rate: 250000 }),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status, body: responseBody } = await parseJsonResponse<{
|
||
error: string
|
||
type: string
|
||
errors: Array<{ field: string; message: string }>
|
||
}>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(responseBody.type).toBe('validation_error')
|
||
const issue = responseBody.errors.find((e) => e.field === 'exchange_rate')
|
||
// Actionable, and Swedish: getErrorMessage passes a 'Valideringsfel:'
|
||
// summary through verbatim, so this is what the user actually reads.
|
||
expect(issue?.message).toContain('100 000')
|
||
expect(responseBody.error).toContain('Valideringsfel')
|
||
expect(supplierInvoiceInsert()).toBeUndefined()
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rejects exactly 100000: the CHECK bound is exclusive, so the mirror is too', async () => {
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: body({ currency: 'EUR', exchange_rate: 100000 }),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(supplierInvoiceInsert()).toBeUndefined()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('accepts 99999.99, the largest rate the CHECK allows', async () => {
|
||
enqueueHappyPath()
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: body({ currency: 'EUR', exchange_rate: 99999.99 }),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
expect(supplierInvoiceInsert()!.exchange_rate).toBe(99999.99)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
// ── Särskild löneskatt (SLP, apply_slp) ─────────────────────────────────────
|
||
|
||
describe('POST /api/supplier-invoices: särskild löneskatt (apply_slp)', () => {
|
||
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
|
||
|
||
function slpBody(items: Record<string, unknown>[]) {
|
||
return {
|
||
supplier_id: VALID_UUID,
|
||
supplier_invoice_number: 'LF-SLP',
|
||
invoice_date: '2024-06-01',
|
||
due_date: '2024-07-01',
|
||
items,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||
reset()
|
||
eventBus.clear()
|
||
mockSupabase.auth.getUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: mockUser } })
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rejects apply_slp on a non-741x account with SI_CREATE_SLP_INVALID_ACCOUNT', async () => {
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: slpBody([
|
||
{ description: 'Konsult', amount: 10000, account_number: '6200', vat_rate: 0.25, apply_slp: true },
|
||
]),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_SLP_INVALID_ACCOUNT')
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('rejects apply_slp combined with periodisering on the same item', async () => {
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: slpBody([
|
||
{
|
||
description: 'Tjänstepension',
|
||
amount: 10000,
|
||
account_number: '7412',
|
||
vat_rate: 0,
|
||
apply_slp: true,
|
||
accrual_period_start: '2024-06-01',
|
||
accrual_period_end: '2024-12-31',
|
||
},
|
||
]),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
|
||
|
||
expect(status).toBe(400)
|
||
expect(body.error.code).toBe('SI_CREATE_SLP_ACCRUAL')
|
||
expect(mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('happy path: apply_slp on a 7412 line is stored on the item and reaches the generator', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID }), error: null }) // supplier lookup
|
||
enqueue({ data: 9 }) // get_next_arrival_number
|
||
enqueue({ data: makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-slp' }), error: null }) // insert invoice
|
||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // insert items
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'accrual' }, error: null }) // settings
|
||
mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'je-slp' })
|
||
enqueue({ data: null, error: null }) // update registration_journal_entry_id
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: slpBody([
|
||
{ description: 'Avanza tjänstepension', amount: 10000, account_number: '7412', vat_rate: 0, apply_slp: true },
|
||
]),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
|
||
// The DB insert carries the flag...
|
||
const itemsInsert = findCall('supplier_invoice_items', 'insert')
|
||
expect(itemsInsert).toBeDefined()
|
||
const rows = itemsInsert![0] as Array<Record<string, unknown>>
|
||
expect(rows[0].apply_slp).toBe(true)
|
||
expect(rows[0].account_number).toBe('7412')
|
||
|
||
// ...and the same items array reaches the registration generator, which
|
||
// injects the 7533/2514 pair from it.
|
||
const generatorItems = mockCreateSupplierInvoiceRegistrationEntry.mock
|
||
.calls[0][4] as Array<Record<string, unknown>>
|
||
expect(generatorItems[0].apply_slp).toBe(true)
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
it('defaults apply_slp to false when omitted', async () => {
|
||
enqueue({ data: makeSupplier({ id: VALID_UUID }), error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: 10 })
|
||
enqueue({ data: makeSupplierInvoice({ id: 'si-noslp' }), error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash' }, error: null })
|
||
|
||
const response = await POST(
|
||
createMockRequest('/api/supplier-invoices', {
|
||
method: 'POST',
|
||
body: slpBody([
|
||
{ description: 'Pensionspremie utan SLP-flagga', amount: 5000, account_number: '7412', vat_rate: 0 },
|
||
]),
|
||
}),
|
||
)
|
||
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
|
||
expect(status).toBe(200)
|
||
|
||
const itemsInsert = findCall('supplier_invoice_items', 'insert')
|
||
const rows = itemsInsert![0] as Array<Record<string, unknown>>
|
||
expect(rows[0].apply_slp).toBe(false)
|
||
})
|
||
})
|