Files
accounted/app/api/transactions/[id]/book/__tests__/route.test.ts
T
4e1eb3d662 fix(cash-accounts): never propose or accept an orphaned twin ledger as counter-account; match and re-point across sibling ledgers (#1643) (#2010)
* fix(cash-accounts): never propose or accept an orphaned cash-account ledger as counter-account (#1643)

A broken bank reconnect leaves cash_accounts rows that share the live
account's IBAN (held by a revoked connection, or demoted to manual by the
#916 fix). Three consequences are fixed here:

- Problem 4 (silent mis-booking): the own-account transfer detector paired
  with such an orphan and proposed its ledger as the counter-account, and a
  counterparty template learned from that result replayed as 1940/1931 in
  the booking dialog. The detector now tolerates several rows on one IBAN,
  never pairs with the transaction's own row, a disabled row, or a revoked
  holder; the mapping engine drops a "transfer" whose counter equals the
  settlement account; suggest-categories withholds learned suggestions that
  reference an orphaned ledger; and both commit paths (POST
  /api/transactions/[id]/categorize, categorizeMatchedTransaction) reject
  with the new TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT (400). Orphans are
  only refused in the COUNTER position: a stranded row still settles on its
  own ledger, and a manual account without a live IBAN twin is never
  treated as orphaned, so transfers between two live accounts keep booking.
- Problem 1 (match dialog): the ranked unmatched-entries path also offers
  vouchers booked on sibling ledgers of the same IBAN, and manualLink
  accepts a voucher line on a sibling ledger. When it does, the same locked
  UPDATE re-points transactions.cash_account_id to the live sibling row
  (currency-gated, like PATCH /api/transactions/[id]/cash-account) so the
  account-keyed reconciliation does not count a cross-account link as an
  imbalance on both ledgers.
- Problem 3 (naming): allocatePsd2LedgerAccount names the chart account
  BAS-style (BAS reference name for a standard slot, else "Bankkonto
  <CUR>") instead of the ASPSP-reported holder name.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(cash-accounts): address review findings on the orphaned-ledger guards (#1643)

One in-memory topology (cash_accounts rows + bank_connections status) now
defines "live", "orphaned" and "same physical account" for the transfer
detector, the match/link flows and every commit guard, so a proposal is
never made that a guard later rejects.

- Finding 1/4/6 (own IBAN as counterparty): findPairableCashAccountByIban
  treats the transaction's own IBAN as "not a transfer": every same-currency
  row on that IBAN is the same physical account, whichever is live, so
  interest stamped with the own IBAN never pairs with a twin (two active
  rows, a demoted-manual twin, or a live twin of a stranded row). Only a
  pocket in another currency on that IBAN can still pair. guardCounterLegs
  refuses a same-IBAN same-currency twin in the counter position on every
  commit path, even when both rows are active.
- Finding 3: with several surviving candidates (currency pockets with no
  discriminator, or two active twins) the finder returns null instead of
  picking the lowest ledger, which is what the pre-PR lookup did.
- Finding 5: the finder drops every row in the orphaned set, the same
  predicate the commit guards use (demoted-manual twins included).
- Finding 9: "live" means enabled + connection status 'active'; an
  expired/error twin of a live row is orphaned, a lone expired connection
  (re-auth window) is not.
- Finding 2: siblings are keyed on (normalized IBAN, currency) in
  describeCashAccountSiblings and the unmatched-entries route, so a SEK
  transaction can no longer link to a voucher whose only bank leg is on the
  EUR pocket of the same IBAN; manualLink rejects that as before.
- Finding 8: manualLink re-points a row only when the voucher sits on the
  LIVE sibling and the own row is not live; the reverse direction links
  without moving the row.
- Finding 7: the v1 REST categorize route runs the same guardCounterLegs
  check after account_override and returns
  TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT. MCP stages through
  categorizeMatchedTransaction, already covered.
- Finding 10: a learned template whose stale 19xx leg is a twin of the
  settlement row is rewritten to the settlement account (it is the bank
  leg, not the counter) instead of refused; suggest-categories exempts each
  transaction's own settlement ledger before withholding a suggestion. The
  error message now covers both the twin and the disconnected case.

Tests pin each behavior (service, detector, manualLink, unmatched-entries,
dashboard and v1 categorize routes, suggest-categories).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(cash-accounts): address round-2 review findings (#1643)

1+3. Orphan derivation keyed on (IBAN, currency): loadCashAccountTopology
   now keys the live twin on normalized IBAN plus currency (the rule every
   other "same physical account" check in the PR already used), so a
   manual or deselected GBP/EUR pocket beside a live SEK pocket of a
   multi-currency account is never orphaned, still pairs in the transfer
   detector and is accepted as counter at commit. Twin computation is
   shared (twinLedgersOf).
2. suggest-categories mirrors guardCounterLegs: a learned 19xx leg that is
   a twin of the transaction's own row is rewritten to the settlement
   ledger in the offered suggestion instead of being withheld; only a true
   counter-position orphan (or a twin that would book the settlement
   ledger against itself) is withheld. One topology load per batch
   (loadCounterLegTopology).
4. The free-form dialog path (POST /api/transactions/[id]/book) gets a
   line-level guard (guardBookedCounterLines): a 19xx line that is a twin
   of the transaction's own row or an orphaned ledger, alongside the
   settlement leg, is refused with TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT.
   Only runs when the lines touch two distinct 19xx ledgers. The twin
   rewrite in suggest-categories (2) covers the both-active shape before
   the dialog is even opened.
5. manualLink re-points the row onto the sibling ledger the voucher was
   booked on whenever the sibling is live or the own row is not (both-live
   twins and both-dead rows included); only a live row whose voucher sits
   on a dead sibling links without moving. unmatched-entries now uses
   describeCashAccountSiblings and does not offer dead-sibling vouchers to
   a live row.

DECISIONS.md: the PR's existing review follow-up line amended.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(cash-accounts): address round-3 review findings (#1643)

1. Revoked-held rows are no longer orphaned unconditionally. A row whose
   connection is revoked is orphaned only under the twin rule (not live
   AND a live row shares its normalized IBAN + currency), so a
   disconnected-but-real account (the company's only 1930, or two real
   accounts on one revoked connection) stays pairable by the transfer
   detector and bookable as counter on every guarded path. Tests cover
   the no-twin case for getOrphanedCounterLedgers,
   findPairableCashAccountByIban, detectOwnAccountTransfer,
   guardCounterLegs and guardBookedCounterLines; the existing revoked
   tests now use a twin shape.
2. manualLink / unmatched-entries decide the re-point on the destination:
   a new shouldRepointToSibling moves onto a live sibling, or onto a dead
   one only when the own row's holder is gone (released: bank_connection_id
   null or revoked) and no sibling is live. An expired/error/pending own
   row links without moving. SiblingCashAccount gains `released`. Tests:
   expired own row + demoted twin links without moving and the twin's
   vouchers are not offered.
3. loadCounterLegTopology is exercised directly: settlement ledger and
   twins, other-currency pocket, null/unknown ids, cache, orphan set
   equal to guardCounterLegs' refusals on the same fixture, lookup failure.
4. guardBookedCounterLines docstring and the /book route comment now state
   that only the two-cash-legs shape is inspected; a single hand-typed
   19xx line is not (covering it would cost a cash_accounts lookup on
   every ordinary booking). DECISIONS.md lines amended accordingly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(cash-accounts): address round-4 review findings (#1643)

1. Same-connection re-registration twins (the dominant prod shape): two
   enabled rows on one active connection sharing (IBAN, currency) are now
   told apart by balance_updated_at; only the most recently synced row is
   live, the other is a stale twin (orphaned as a counter, never a
   re-point destination, and the transfer detector pairs with the syncing
   row alone). Rows with no stamp or the same stamp both stay live.
2. POST /book: a single 19xx line that is a sibling ledger the row should
   move to (the live twin of a stranded row) re-points cash_account_id in
   the same locked UPDATE that links the voucher, mirroring manualLink.
   guardBookedCounterLines returns { refusedLedger, repointCashAccountId };
   an ordinary booking pays one PK read of the own row.
3. manualLink refuses the link (success:false, Swedish error) when the
   voucher sits only on a dead sibling instead of writing a cross-account
   link with a server-side warn; the REST and MCP link callers reach it
   without the unmatched-entries filter.
4. manualLink judges a voucher touching several sibling ledgers on the
   best of them (a live sibling, else the first the row may move to)
   instead of the first line PostgREST returns.

Tests pinned in lib/cash-accounts, lib/reconciliation and the /book route;
the two DECISIONS.md lines for #1643 amended in place.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(cash-accounts): address round-5 review findings (#1643)

1/2/5. Same-connection twin liveness no longer ranks on
   cash_accounts.balance_updated_at (a connect-time snapshot the sync
   never refreshes, inverted on prod in 4 of 5 stamped groups). The live
   row is the one whose external_uid the bank still lists in
   bank_connections.accounts_data (rewritten on every sync); no listing,
   both listed or neither listed keeps both rows live (round-3 behavior).
   getConnectionStatuses selects accounts_data in the same query.
3. guardBookedCounterLines single-19xx-line shape: a twin the row may not
   move to (dead or disabled) is refused with
   TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT instead of posting the only
   bank leg on the dead ledger; an unrelated 19xx line still posts as
   typed. Route test added.
4. Disabled cash_accounts rows are never siblings, so neither manualLink
   nor /book re-points a transaction onto a deselected row; a voucher
   booked only there is refused as a cross-account link.
6. PR body rewritten to the final rules; DECISIONS.md round-4 line
   amended (signal correction, /book refusal, disabled siblings).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(cash-accounts): never treat a null external_uid as listed by the bank (#1643)

CashAccount.external_uid is nullable in the shared type; the same-connection
twin rule now skips null uids instead of passing them to Set.has, which
failed the strict type check in CI.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

* fix(cash-accounts): drop the same-connection twin liveness rule; both rows stay live (#1643)

Two enabled rows on one active bank connection sharing (IBAN, currency)
are no longer ranked. Round 4 ranked on cash_accounts.balance_updated_at
and round 5 on external_uid presence in bank_connections.accounts_data;
each was verified against prod and each was contradicted by it (ingest
routes by the accounts_data entry's ledger_account, which in two groups
points at the OLD row, so the "stale" row is the one still being fed).

Restores the round-3 behavior: neither twin is orphaned, the transfer
finder returns null when both survive, no guard refuses either, and
shouldRepointToSibling treats both as live siblings. No replacement
signal; how to model the shape is a founder decision (PR #2010 review).
getConnectionStatuses no longer selects accounts_data.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015nAd8XJ2RPCmG2eKoLBdna

---------

Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 00:26:47 +02:00

709 lines
28 KiB
TypeScript

import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
import { NextResponse } from 'next/server'
import {
createMockRequest,
parseJsonResponse,
createMockRouteParams,
createQueuedMockSupabase,
makeTransaction,
makeJournalEntry,
} from '@/tests/helpers'
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events'
const { supabase: mockSupabase, enqueue, reset, findCalls } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
const requireAuthMock = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-auth', () => ({
requireAuth: (...args: unknown[]) => requireAuthMock(...args),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/init', () => ({
ensureInitialized: vi.fn(),
}))
vi.mock('@/lib/company/context', () => ({
requireCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
getActiveCompanyId: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue('company-1'),
}))
const requireWriteMock = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/auth/require-write', () => ({
requireWritePermission: (...args: unknown[]) => requireWriteMock(...args),
}))
const mockCreateJournalEntry = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/engine', () => ({
createJournalEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockCreateJournalEntry(...args),
}))
const mockReverseOrphanedJournalEntry = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/bookkeeping/cancel-orphaned-entry', () => ({
reverseOrphanedJournalEntry: (...args: unknown[]) => mockReverseOrphanedJournalEntry(...args),
}))
// Booking-time duplicate guard: mocked so route tests exercise the WIRING
// (warn / force / mismatch); the detection query itself is unit-tested in
// lib/transactions/__tests__/booking-duplicate-detection.test.ts.
const mockDetectDup = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/transactions/booking-duplicate-detection', () => ({
detectBookingDuplicate: (...args: unknown[]) => mockDetectDup(...args),
}))
// Behandlingshistorik append: mocked so we can assert the dismissal is
// persisted without reaching the service-role client.
const mockAppendProcessingHistory = vi.fn()
vi.mock('@/lib/processing-history/append', () => ({
appendProcessingHistory: (...args: unknown[]) => mockAppendProcessingHistory(...args),
}))
import { POST } from '../route'
const VALID_UUID = '550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000'
const SIBLING_UUID = '660e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440111'
const OTHER_UUID = '770e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440222'
const VOUCHER_JE_UUID = '880e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440333'
describe('POST /api/transactions/[id]/book', () => {
const mockUser = { id: 'user-1', email: 'test@test.se' }
const validBody = {
fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID,
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
description: 'Test booking',
lines: [
{ account_number: '6200', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
],
}
beforeEach(() => {
vi.clearAllMocks()
reset()
eventBus.clear()
requireAuthMock.mockResolvedValue({ user: mockUser, supabase: mockSupabase })
requireWriteMock.mockResolvedValue({ ok: true })
// No booking-duplicate by default; guard tests override per-case.
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue(null)
mockAppendProcessingHistory.mockResolvedValue('evt-1')
mockReverseOrphanedJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(undefined)
})
it('returns 401 when not authenticated', async () => {
requireAuthMock.mockResolvedValue({
user: null,
supabase: mockSupabase,
error: NextResponse.json({ error: 'Unauthorized' }, { status: 401 }),
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
expect(status).toBe(401)
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Unauthorized' })
})
it('returns 403 when the caller is a viewer', async () => {
requireWriteMock.mockResolvedValue({
ok: false,
response: NextResponse.json({ error: 'Forbidden' }, { status: 403 }),
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
expect(status).toBe(403)
expect(body).toEqual({ error: 'Forbidden' })
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('returns 400 when missing required fields', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: { fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
// Inverted from `toBe('Validation failed')`: the constant was the bug.
expect(body.error).toMatch(/^Valideringsfel: /)
expect(body.error).toContain('entry_date')
})
it('returns 404 when transaction not found', async () => {
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Not found' } })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-999/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-999' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(404)
expect(body.error).toBe('Transaction not found')
})
it('returns 409 when transaction already has a journal entry', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error).toBe('Transaction already has a journal entry')
})
it('returns 400 when journal entry creation fails (engine error)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', journal_entry_id: null })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockRejectedValue(new Error('Entry is not balanced'))
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
// Untyped engine errors map to the Swedish context fallback; the raw
// English message must never reach the response field (issue #337).
expect(body.error).toBe('Kunde inte hantera transaktionen. Försök igen.')
expect(body.error).not.toContain('not balanced')
})
it('creates journal entry and links to transaction (happy path)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: -500,
journal_entry_id: null,
})
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
// Fetch transaction
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
// Update transaction
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null })
const emitSpy = vi.spyOn(eventBus, 'emit')
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
success: boolean
journal_entry_id: string
data: { id: string }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-new')
expect(body.data.id).toBe('je-new')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.anything(), 'company-1', 'user-1', {
fiscal_period_id: VALID_UUID,
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
description: 'Test booking',
source_type: 'bank_transaction',
source_id: 'tx-1',
lines: validBody.lines,
})
expect(emitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({ type: 'transaction.categorized' })
)
})
it('returns 400 TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT when a line books the settlement row against its active twin (#1643)', async () => {
// The issue's dialog shape: 1930 and 1931 both enabled on one active
// connection; "Ändra rader" pre-filled 1930 debit / 1931 credit from a
// template learned on 1931. Booking it would move money between two
// ledgers of one physical account with nothing reaching the P&L.
const iban = 'SE4550000000058398257466'
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 500, journal_entry_id: null, cash_account_id: 'ca-1930' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch transaction
enqueue({
data: [
{ id: 'ca-1930', ledger_account: '1930', iban, currency: 'SEK', enabled: true, bank_connection_id: 'conn-live' },
{ id: 'ca-1931', ledger_account: '1931', iban, currency: 'SEK', enabled: true, bank_connection_id: 'conn-live' },
],
}) // cash_accounts topology
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'conn-live', status: 'active' }] }) // bank_connections statuses
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
...validBody,
lines: [
{ account_number: '1930', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
{ account_number: '1931', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
],
},
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string; details: { accountNumber: string } } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT')
expect(body.error.details.accountNumber).toBe('1931')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('re-points a stranded row onto the live sibling when its single bank line is that ledger (#1643 round 4)', async () => {
// Nyte-shape: the transaction sits on the demoted 1931, the user books it
// with the bank leg on the live 1940 against a P&L account. The voucher
// posts on 1940 and the row moves there in the same locked UPDATE, so
// neither ledger's reconciliation is left with a half.
const iban = 'SE4550000000058398257466'
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 500, journal_entry_id: null, cash_account_id: 'ca-orphan' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch transaction
enqueue({ data: { ledger_account: '1931' } }) // own row
enqueue({
data: [
{ id: 'ca-orphan', ledger_account: '1931', iban, currency: 'SEK', enabled: true, bank_connection_id: null },
{ id: 'ca-live', ledger_account: '1940', iban, currency: 'SEK', enabled: true, bank_connection_id: 'conn-live' },
],
}) // cash_accounts topology
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'conn-live', status: 'active' }] }) // bank_connections statuses
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' }))
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null }) // link update
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
...validBody,
lines: [
{ account_number: '1940', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
{ account_number: '8311', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
],
},
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(findCalls('transactions', 'update')).toContainEqual([
expect.objectContaining({ journal_entry_id: 'je-new', cash_account_id: 'ca-live' }),
])
})
it('returns 400 TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT when the single bank line sits on a dead twin of the live own row (#1643 round 5)', async () => {
// Problem 4: the transaction sits on the live 1940, the dialog pre-fills
// [1931, 3011] from a template learned before the reconnect, and 1931 is
// the revoked twin. Posting would strand the only bank leg on 1931 while
// the transaction stays on 1940, so it is refused before the engine runs.
const iban = 'SE4550000000058398257466'
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 500, journal_entry_id: null, cash_account_id: 'ca-live' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch transaction
enqueue({ data: { ledger_account: '1940' } }) // own row
enqueue({
data: [
{ id: 'ca-live', ledger_account: '1940', iban, currency: 'SEK', enabled: true, bank_connection_id: 'conn-live' },
{ id: 'ca-orphan', ledger_account: '1931', iban, currency: 'SEK', enabled: true, bank_connection_id: 'conn-old' },
],
}) // cash_accounts topology
enqueue({
data: [
{ id: 'conn-live', status: 'active' },
{ id: 'conn-old', status: 'revoked' },
],
}) // bank_connections statuses
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: {
...validBody,
lines: [
{ account_number: '1931', debit_amount: 500, credit_amount: 0 },
{ account_number: '3011', debit_amount: 0, credit_amount: 500 },
],
},
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string; details: { accountNumber: string } } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TX_CATEGORIZE_ORPHANED_COUNTER_ACCOUNT')
expect(body.error.details.accountNumber).toBe('1931')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('atomically unignores an ignored transaction when booking it', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({
id: 'tx-1',
amount: -500,
journal_entry_id: null,
is_ignored: true,
})
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' }))
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null })
const response = await POST(
createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', { method: 'POST', body: validBody }),
createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }),
)
expect(response.status).toBe(200)
expect(findCalls('transactions', 'update')).toContainEqual([
expect.objectContaining({
journal_entry_id: 'je-new',
is_business: true,
is_ignored: false,
}),
])
})
it('returns 500 when transaction update fails', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', journal_entry_id: null })
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
// Update fails
enqueue({ data: null, error: { message: 'Update failed' } })
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
error: { code: string; message: string }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(500)
expect(body.error).toMatchObject({
code: 'INTERNAL_ERROR',
message: 'Ett oväntat serverfel uppstod. Försök igen senare.',
})
expect(mockReverseOrphanedJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'company-1',
'user-1',
'je-new',
expect.any(String),
)
})
it('stornos the posted orphan when another booking wins the transaction-link race', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', journal_entry_id: null })
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
const response = await POST(
createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', { method: 'POST', body: validBody }),
createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }),
)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TX_CATEGORIZE_RACE')
expect(mockReverseOrphanedJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.anything(),
'company-1',
'user-1',
'je-new',
expect.any(String),
)
})
it('maps the ignored-row constraint to a typed conflict and stornos the posted orphan', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', journal_entry_id: null, is_ignored: true })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null })
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' }))
enqueue({
data: null,
error: {
code: '23514',
message:
'new row for relation "transactions" violates check constraint "transactions_is_ignored_no_journal_entry"',
},
})
const response = await POST(
createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', { method: 'POST', body: validBody }),
createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }),
)
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string; message: string } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TX_CATEGORIZE_IGNORED_CONFLICT')
expect(body.error.message).not.toContain('check constraint')
expect(mockReverseOrphanedJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
})
// ── Underlag propagation (pinned document + matched inbox items) ──────
// Attach-before-book: a document pinned to the transaction (or an inbox
// item hand-matched to it) must land on the new verifikat, or every
// underlag surface reads "Underlag saknas" for a booking that HAS its
// underlag (the 2026-08-13 user report).
it('anchors the pinned document to the new verifikat (attach-before-book)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch transaction
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null }) // update transaction
enqueue({ data: { document_id: 'doc-1' } }) // propagate: tx pin lookup
enqueue({ data: { journal_entry_id: null } }) // pinned doc unanchored
enqueue({ data: { id: 'je-new' } }) // linkToJournalEntry: entry ownership check
enqueue({ data: { id: 'doc-1', journal_entry_id: 'je-new' } }) // doc update
enqueue({ data: [] }) // no matched inbox items
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(findCalls('document_attachments', 'update')).toContainEqual([
{ journal_entry_id: 'je-new', journal_entry_line_id: null },
])
})
it('stamps a matched inbox item consumed by the booking', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch transaction
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null }) // update transaction
enqueue({ data: { document_id: null } }) // propagate: nothing pinned
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'i1', document_id: null }] }) // matched inbox item
enqueue({ data: null }) // stamp update
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(findCalls('invoice_inbox_items', 'update')).toContainEqual([
{ created_journal_entry_id: 'je-new' },
])
})
it('still returns success when underlag propagation fails (best-effort)', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch transaction
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null }) // update transaction
enqueue({ data: { document_id: 'doc-1' } }) // propagate: tx pin lookup
enqueue({ data: { journal_entry_id: null } }) // pinned doc unanchored
enqueue({ data: null }) // linkToJournalEntry: entry lookup fails -> throws
enqueue({ data: [] }) // no matched inbox items
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: validBody,
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean }>(response)
// The verifikat is already posted: a propagation failure is logged and
// repaired by re-running, never allowed to fail the booking.
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(findCalls('document_attachments', 'update')).toEqual([])
})
// ── Booking-time duplicate guard ──────────────────────────────────────
it('returns 409 duplicate warning when a booked sibling shares date+amount', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID,
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
voucher_label: 'A142',
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
description: 'redan bokförd',
amount: -500,
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', { method: 'POST', body: validBody })
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
error: { code: string; details: { candidate: { transaction_id: string; voucher_label: string } } }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TRANSACTION_BOOK_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE')
expect(body.error.details.candidate.transaction_id).toBe(SIBLING_UUID)
expect(body.error.details.candidate.voucher_label).toBe('A142')
// Critically: no verifikat is created when a duplicate is flagged.
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
// Blocking a duplicate is not a dismissal: nothing is logged.
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('books when force=true and the expected sibling still matches', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null }) // update
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID,
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
voucher_label: 'A142',
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
description: null,
amount: -500,
})
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: { ...validBody, force: true, expected_duplicate_transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean; journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(body.journal_entry_id).toBe('je-new')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
// The dismissal is recorded to behandlingshistorik (BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8).
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({
eventType: 'BankTransactionDuplicateDismissed',
aggregateType: 'BankTransaction',
aggregateId: 'tx-1',
actor: { type: 'user', id: 'user-1' },
payload: expect.objectContaining({
transaction_id: 'tx-1',
dismissed_transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID,
}),
}),
)
})
it('returns 409 when a ledger-only voucher (no sibling transaction) already books this movement', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 98565, journal_entry_id: null })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
// A voucher-keyed candidate has no transaction_id: it's bound by je id.
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
transaction_id: null,
journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID,
voucher_label: 'A2',
entry_date: '2026-03-30',
description: 'Inbetalning kundfaktura 2026001',
amount: 98565,
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', { method: 'POST', body: validBody })
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{
error: { code: string; details: { candidate: { transaction_id: string | null; journal_entry_id: string } } }
}>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TRANSACTION_BOOK_POSSIBLE_DUPLICATE')
expect(body.error.details.candidate.transaction_id).toBeNull()
expect(body.error.details.candidate.journal_entry_id).toBe(VOUCHER_JE_UUID)
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('books a voucher-keyed duplicate when force=true binds the expected journal_entry_id', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: 98565, journal_entry_id: null })
const je = makeJournalEntry({ id: 'je-new' })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
enqueue({ data: [{ id: 'tx-1' }], error: null }) // update
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
transaction_id: null,
journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID,
voucher_label: 'A2',
entry_date: '2026-03-30',
description: null,
amount: 98565,
})
mockCreateJournalEntry.mockResolvedValue(je)
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: { ...validBody, force: true, expected_duplicate_journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ success: boolean; journal_entry_id: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(200)
expect(body.success).toBe(true)
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(mockAppendProcessingHistory).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.objectContaining({
eventType: 'BankTransactionDuplicateDismissed',
payload: expect.objectContaining({
dismissed_transaction_id: null,
dismissed_journal_entry_id: VOUCHER_JE_UUID,
}),
}),
)
})
it('rejects force=true when the expected sibling no longer matches the detected one', async () => {
const tx = makeTransaction({ id: 'tx-1', amount: -500, journal_entry_id: null })
enqueue({ data: tx, error: null }) // fetch
mockDetectDup.mockResolvedValue({
transaction_id: SIBLING_UUID, // server detects this one…
journal_entry_id: 'je-existing',
voucher_label: 'A142',
entry_date: '2025-01-15',
description: null,
amount: -500,
})
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: { ...validBody, force: true, expected_duplicate_transaction_id: OTHER_UUID }, // …caller claims another
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status, body } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: { code: string } }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(409)
expect(body.error.code).toBe('TRANSACTION_BOOK_FORCE_CANDIDATE_MISMATCH')
expect(mockCreateJournalEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
it('returns 400 when force=true is sent without expected_duplicate_transaction_id', async () => {
const request = createMockRequest('/api/transactions/tx-1/book', {
method: 'POST',
body: { ...validBody, force: true },
})
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'tx-1' }))
const { status } = await parseJsonResponse<{ error: string }>(response)
expect(status).toBe(400)
})
})