* fix(dashboard): exclude ignored and already-triaged transactions from stale count The "Gamla transaktioner" widget counted transactions that had been ignored or already marked as is_business=true but not yet booked, so users saw a nag for a row they had already dealt with — and the /transactions inbox correctly hid it. Align the count with the inbox criterion (is_business IS NULL, is_ignored = false) so the widget clears when the row leaves the inbox. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(transactions): read entity_type from settings response wrapper The transactions page read entityRes.entity_type directly, but /api/settings returns { data: { entity_type, ... } }. The expression was always undefined, so setEntityType never fired and entityType stayed at its initial 'enskild_firma'. The template picker's entity_type filter then dropped every aktiebolag-tagged user template for AB customers — only entity_type='all' templates made it through. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * stale templates bank sync journal entry from transaction * fixed pr comments * fixed pr comment --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
272 lines
9.4 KiB
TypeScript
272 lines
9.4 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
|
import {
|
|
deriveAbsenceLineItems,
|
|
buildSjukloneperioder,
|
|
type AbsenceDay,
|
|
type DeriveInput,
|
|
} from '../derive-absence-line-items'
|
|
import type { PayrollConfig } from '../payroll-config'
|
|
|
|
const config: PayrollConfig = {
|
|
configYear: 2026,
|
|
avgifterTotal: 0.3142,
|
|
avgifterAlderspension: 0.1021,
|
|
avgifterSjukforsakring: 0.0355,
|
|
avgifterForaldraforsakring: 0.02,
|
|
avgifterEfterlevandepension: 0.003,
|
|
avgifterArbetsmarknad: 0.0264,
|
|
avgifterArbetsskada: 0.001,
|
|
avgifterAllmanLoneavgift: 0.1262,
|
|
avgifterReduced65plus: 0.1021,
|
|
avgifterYouthRate: 0.2081,
|
|
avgifterYouthSalaryCap: 25000,
|
|
avgifterVaxaStodRate: 0.1021,
|
|
avgifterVaxaStodCap: 35000,
|
|
avgifterMinimumAnnual: 1000,
|
|
egenavgifterTotal: 0.2897,
|
|
slpRate: 0.2426,
|
|
prisbasbelopp: 59200,
|
|
inkomstbasbelopp: 83400,
|
|
maxPgi: 625500,
|
|
sgiCeiling: 592000,
|
|
statligSkattBrytpunkt: 660400,
|
|
traktamenteHeldag: 300,
|
|
traktamenteHalvdag: 150,
|
|
traktamenteNatt: 150,
|
|
milersattningEgenBil: 25,
|
|
milersattningFormansbilFossil: 12,
|
|
milersattningFormansbilEl: 9.5,
|
|
kostformanHeldag: 310,
|
|
kostformanLunch: 124,
|
|
kostformanFrukost: 62,
|
|
friskvardCap: 5000,
|
|
bilformanSlr: 0.0255,
|
|
sjuklonRate: 0.8,
|
|
karensavdragFactor: 0.2,
|
|
maxKarensavdragPerYear: 10,
|
|
reducedAvgiftAge: 67,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const days = (entries: Array<[string, AbsenceDay['absence_type']]>): AbsenceDay[] =>
|
|
entries.map(([d, t]) => ({ absence_date: d, absence_type: t, hours: 8 }))
|
|
|
|
const baseInput = (over: Partial<DeriveInput> = {}): DeriveInput => ({
|
|
monthlySalary: 30000,
|
|
payrollConfig: config,
|
|
periodDays: [],
|
|
lookbackSickDates: [],
|
|
vabDaysYtd: 0,
|
|
parentalDaysPregnancyYtd: 0,
|
|
...over,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('buildSjukloneperioder', () => {
|
|
it('treats consecutive days as one period', () => {
|
|
const segs = buildSjukloneperioder(['2026-04-06', '2026-04-07', '2026-04-08'])
|
|
expect(segs).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(segs[0].sickDayCount).toBe(3)
|
|
expect(segs[0].startDate).toBe('2026-04-06')
|
|
expect(segs[0].endDate).toBe('2026-04-08')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('merges segments within 5-day återinsjuknande window', () => {
|
|
// Sick Mon-Wed, gap Thu-Fri-Sat-Sun-Mon (5 days), sick Tue
|
|
// Gap from last sick (Wed Apr 8) to next (Tue Apr 14) = 6 calendar days → new period
|
|
const segs1 = buildSjukloneperioder(['2026-04-06', '2026-04-07', '2026-04-08', '2026-04-14'])
|
|
expect(segs1).toHaveLength(2)
|
|
|
|
// Gap of exactly 5 days → same period
|
|
// Wed Apr 8 → Mon Apr 13 = 5 days
|
|
const segs2 = buildSjukloneperioder(['2026-04-06', '2026-04-07', '2026-04-08', '2026-04-13'])
|
|
expect(segs2).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(segs2[0].sickDayCount).toBe(4)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('starts a new period when gap is >5 days', () => {
|
|
const segs = buildSjukloneperioder(['2026-04-06', '2026-04-13'])
|
|
// gap = 7 → new period
|
|
expect(segs).toHaveLength(2)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('returns empty for empty input', () => {
|
|
expect(buildSjukloneperioder([])).toEqual([])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('deduplicates duplicate dates', () => {
|
|
const segs = buildSjukloneperioder(['2026-04-06', '2026-04-06', '2026-04-07'])
|
|
expect(segs).toHaveLength(1)
|
|
expect(segs[0].sickDayCount).toBe(2)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('deriveAbsenceLineItems — sick', () => {
|
|
it('emits karensavdrag for a single sick day', () => {
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({ periodDays: days([['2026-04-06', 'sick']]) }),
|
|
)
|
|
const karens = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_karens')
|
|
expect(karens).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(karens!.quantity).toBe(1)
|
|
expect(karens!.amount).toBeLessThan(0)
|
|
expect(result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_day2_14')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
expect(result.aggregated.sickDays).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('emits karens + day-2-14 for a 5-day period', () => {
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({
|
|
periodDays: days([
|
|
['2026-04-06', 'sick'],
|
|
['2026-04-07', 'sick'],
|
|
['2026-04-08', 'sick'],
|
|
['2026-04-09', 'sick'],
|
|
['2026-04-10', 'sick'],
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
const karens = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_karens')
|
|
const day2_14 = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_day2_14')
|
|
expect(karens).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(day2_14).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(day2_14!.quantity).toBe(4) // days 2-5 of segment
|
|
expect(result.flagFkReporting).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flags läkarintyg when day-8 reached (segment day 8+)', () => {
|
|
const periodDays = days(
|
|
Array.from({ length: 9 }, (_, i): [string, 'sick'] => [`2026-04-${String(6 + i).padStart(2, '0')}`, 'sick']),
|
|
)
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(baseInput({ periodDays }))
|
|
expect(result.flagLakarintyg).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('flags FK reporting when segment passes day 14', () => {
|
|
// 16 consecutive sick days
|
|
const periodDays = days(
|
|
Array.from({ length: 16 }, (_, i): [string, 'sick'] => {
|
|
const day = String(6 + i).padStart(2, '0')
|
|
return [`2026-04-${day}`, 'sick']
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(baseInput({ periodDays }))
|
|
expect(result.flagFkReporting).toBe(true)
|
|
const day15 = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_day15_plus')
|
|
expect(day15).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(day15!.quantity).toBe(2) // days 15, 16
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('suppresses karens via återinsjuknande when segment started in lookback', () => {
|
|
// Prior segment: Apr 1-3. Current period sick day: Apr 6 (gap 3 days → merge).
|
|
// Segment now spans Apr 1-6. Period day Apr 6 is segment day 6 → day-2-14, no new karens.
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({
|
|
periodDays: days([['2026-04-06', 'sick']]),
|
|
lookbackSickDates: ['2026-04-01', '2026-04-02', '2026-04-03'],
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
expect(result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_karens')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
const day2_14 = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_day2_14')
|
|
expect(day2_14).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(day2_14!.quantity).toBe(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('suppresses karens when högriskskydd cap reached', () => {
|
|
// 10 prior single-day karens-eligible periods, each separated by >5 days
|
|
const lookback: string[] = []
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
|
|
// periods on the 1st of each prior month
|
|
const month = ((4 - 1 + 12 - i - 1) % 12) + 1 // months 3, 2, 1, 12, ...
|
|
const year = i < 3 ? 2026 : 2025
|
|
lookback.push(`${year}-${String(month).padStart(2, '0')}-01`)
|
|
}
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({
|
|
periodDays: days([['2026-04-15', 'sick']]),
|
|
lookbackSickDates: lookback,
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
// 10 prior karens in 12-month window → this 11th is suppressed
|
|
expect(result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'sick_karens')).toBeUndefined()
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('deriveAbsenceLineItems — VAB', () => {
|
|
it('emits VAB line item with deduction', () => {
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({
|
|
periodDays: days([
|
|
['2026-04-10', 'vab'],
|
|
['2026-04-11', 'vab'],
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
const vab = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'vab')
|
|
expect(vab).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(vab!.quantity).toBe(2)
|
|
expect(vab!.is_vacation_basis).toBe(true) // ≤120 days YTD
|
|
expect(result.aggregated.vabDays).toBe(2)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('marks VAB non-vacation-basis when YTD >= 120', () => {
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({
|
|
periodDays: days([['2026-04-10', 'vab']]),
|
|
vabDaysYtd: 120,
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
const vab = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'vab')
|
|
expect(vab!.is_vacation_basis).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('deriveAbsenceLineItems — parental', () => {
|
|
it('emits parental line item with deduction', () => {
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({
|
|
periodDays: days([
|
|
['2026-04-10', 'parental'],
|
|
['2026-04-11', 'parental'],
|
|
['2026-04-12', 'parental'],
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
const parental = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'parental_leave')
|
|
expect(parental).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(parental!.quantity).toBe(3)
|
|
expect(result.aggregated.parentalDays).toBe(3)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('deriveAbsenceLineItems — unpaid_leave', () => {
|
|
it('emits unpaid_leave line item with a per-day daily-rate deduction', () => {
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(
|
|
baseInput({
|
|
monthlySalary: 42000, // dailyRate = 42 000 / 21 = 2 000
|
|
periodDays: days([
|
|
['2026-04-10', 'unpaid_leave'],
|
|
['2026-04-13', 'unpaid_leave'],
|
|
]),
|
|
}),
|
|
)
|
|
const unpaid = result.lineItems.find(li => li.item_type === 'unpaid_leave')
|
|
expect(unpaid).toBeDefined()
|
|
expect(unpaid!.quantity).toBe(2)
|
|
expect(unpaid!.amount).toBe(-4000)
|
|
// false — engine's Step 3 absence sum already subtracts unpaid_leave;
|
|
// setting the flag would double-count in Step 4 totalGrossDeductions.
|
|
expect(unpaid!.is_gross_deduction).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(unpaid!.is_vacation_basis).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(result.aggregated.unpaidLeaveDays).toBe(2)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('deriveAbsenceLineItems — empty', () => {
|
|
it('returns empty result for no absence', () => {
|
|
const result = deriveAbsenceLineItems(baseInput())
|
|
expect(result.lineItems).toEqual([])
|
|
expect(result.aggregated).toEqual({ sickDays: 0, vabDays: 0, parentalDays: 0, unpaidLeaveDays: 0 })
|
|
expect(result.flagFkReporting).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(result.flagLakarintyg).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|