import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest' const chainCalls: Array<{ method: string; args: unknown[] }> = [] vi.mock('@supabase/ssr', () => { const buildChain = (): unknown => new Proxy( {}, { get(_t, prop) { if (prop === 'then') { return (resolve: (v: unknown) => void) => resolve({ data: [], error: null, count: null }) } return (...args: unknown[]) => { chainCalls.push({ method: String(prop), args }) return buildChain() } }, }, ) return { createServerClient: vi.fn(() => ({ from: vi.fn(() => buildChain()), rpc: vi.fn(() => buildChain()), })), } }) vi.mock('@/lib/email/service', () => ({ getEmailService: () => ({ sendEmail: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ success: true }), }), })) import { processOverdueReminders, determineReminderLevel, calculateDaysOverdue, } from '../reminder-processor' import { getReminderDaysConfig } from '@/lib/email/reminder-templates' describe('determineReminderLevel', () => { it('returns null below the level-1 threshold', () => { expect(determineReminderLevel(10, [])).toBeNull() }) it('returns 1 at 15 days overdue', () => { expect(determineReminderLevel(15, [])).toBe(1) }) it('returns 2 at 30 days when level 1 already sent', () => { expect(determineReminderLevel(30, [1])).toBe(2) }) it('returns 3 at 45 days when 1 and 2 already sent', () => { expect(determineReminderLevel(45, [1, 2])).toBe(3) }) it('returns null when all levels have been sent', () => { expect(determineReminderLevel(60, [1, 2, 3])).toBeNull() }) it('uses a company-specific schedule', () => { const config = { 1: 7, 2: 21, 3: 35 } as const expect(determineReminderLevel(6, [], config)).toBeNull() expect(determineReminderLevel(7, [], config)).toBe(1) expect(determineReminderLevel(21, [1], config)).toBe(2) expect(determineReminderLevel(35, [1, 2], config)).toBe(3) }) }) describe('getReminderDaysConfig', () => { it('returns the existing defaults when no company settings are supplied', () => { expect(getReminderDaysConfig()).toEqual({ 1: 15, 2: 30, 3: 45 }) }) it('returns configured company thresholds', () => { expect(getReminderDaysConfig({ reminder_days_level_1: 5, reminder_days_level_2: 10, reminder_days_level_3: 20, })).toEqual({ 1: 5, 2: 10, 3: 20 }) }) it('falls back to defaults for an invalid stored schedule', () => { expect(getReminderDaysConfig({ reminder_days_level_1: 30, reminder_days_level_2: 20, reminder_days_level_3: 45, })).toEqual({ 1: 15, 2: 30, 3: 45 }) }) }) describe('calculateDaysOverdue', () => { it('returns a positive number for a past due date', () => { const tenDaysAgo = new Date() tenDaysAgo.setDate(tenDaysAgo.getDate() - 10) const days = calculateDaysOverdue(tenDaysAgo.toISOString().split('T')[0]) expect(days).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(9) expect(days).toBeLessThanOrEqual(10) }) }) describe('processOverdueReminders: credit-note filter', () => { beforeEach(() => { chainCalls.length = 0 }) it('excludes credit notes via .is("credited_invoice_id", null)', async () => { await processOverdueReminders() const isCall = chainCalls.find( (c) => c.method === 'is' && c.args[0] === 'credited_invoice_id', ) expect( isCall, 'overdue-invoice query must filter out credit notes: credit notes have a negative total and must never trigger a payment reminder (e.g. KR-F2026002)', ).toBeDefined() expect(isCall?.args[1]).toBeNull() }) it('combines the credit-note filter with status allowlist and due_date cutoff', async () => { await processOverdueReminders() const inStatus = chainCalls.find( (c) => c.method === 'in' && c.args[0] === 'status', ) const isCreditedNull = chainCalls.find( (c) => c.method === 'is' && c.args[0] === 'credited_invoice_id', ) const lteDueDate = chainCalls.find( (c) => c.method === 'lte' && c.args[0] === 'due_date', ) expect(inStatus?.args[1]).toEqual(['sent', 'overdue']) expect(isCreditedNull?.args[1]).toBeNull() expect(lteDueDate).toBeDefined() }) it('uses a positive allowlist (sent + overdue) so paid / partially_paid / cancelled / credited can never match', async () => { await processOverdueReminders() const inStatus = chainCalls.find( (c) => c.method === 'in' && c.args[0] === 'status', ) expect(inStatus?.args[1]).toEqual(['sent', 'overdue']) // Defense in depth: ensure no .eq('status', terminal) somehow snuck in. const eqTerminal = chainCalls.find( (c) => c.method === 'eq' && c.args[0] === 'status' && ['paid', 'partially_paid', 'cancelled', 'credited'].includes( c.args[1] as string, ), ) expect(eqTerminal).toBeUndefined() }) it('includes overdue in the allowlist so level-2 and level-3 reminders re-fire after the first reminder flips status', async () => { await processOverdueReminders() const inStatus = chainCalls.find( (c) => c.method === 'in' && c.args[0] === 'status', ) expect(inStatus?.args[1]).toContain('overdue') }) })