import type { SupabaseClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
import { eventBus } from '@/lib/events'
import { createLogger } from '@/lib/logger'
import { fetchAllRows } from '@/lib/supabase/fetch-all'
import { validatePeriodDuration } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/validate-period-duration'
import type { FiscalPeriod, PeriodStatus } from '@/types'

const log = createLogger('period-service')

/**
 * The two ways a bank transaction can still owe the period a verifikation.
 *
 * Triage is the act of answering "is this an affärshändelse for the company?".
 * The three answers, and what each means for a period lock:
 *
 *   is_business IS NULL, is_ignored = false -> NOT TRIAGED. Nobody has looked
 *       at it. Counted as `untriaged`; blocks.
 *   is_business = true                      -> TRIAGED AS A BUSINESS EVENT. It
 *       owes a verifikation. Blocks unless it already has one (see below);
 *       counted as `businessUnbooked` when it does not.
 *   is_business = false                     -> TRIAGED AND EXCLUDED (privat
 *       uttag / not the company's affär). Never blocks: there is nothing to
 *       bokföra, and holding a lock hostage to a private coffee is over-
 *       blocking, not compliance.
 *   is_ignored = true                       -> TRIAGED AND EXCLUDED, the user's
 *       explicit "hide this, never going to book it" (migration
 *       20260529190000). Never blocks. The column is NOT NULL DEFAULT false,
 *       so `.eq('is_ignored', false)` cannot silently drop rows.
 *
 * "Already has a verifikation" is deliberately NOT `journal_entry_id IS NOT
 * NULL`. That column only covers the 1:1 case; bulk-booked (N tx -> 1 JE, via
 * transaction_voucher_links) and multi-allocated (invoice_payments /
 * supplier_invoice_payments) transactions stay NULL while being anchored to a
 * real verifikat. See lib/transactions/is-booked.ts and its Postgres mirror
 * public.is_transaction_booked(uuid); this helper reproduces all three
 * locations so the guard does not block on already-booked rows.
 */
export interface UnbookedInPeriod {
  /** Never triaged: is_business IS NULL AND is_ignored = false. */
  untriaged: number
  /** Triaged as a business event but anchored to no verifikat at all. */
  businessUnbooked: number
}

/** PostgREST rejects very long URLs, so `.in()` lists are chunked. */
const ANCHOR_LOOKUP_CHUNK = 200

/**
 * Count the bank transactions in [periodStart, periodEnd] that a period lock
 * would strand. Throws on any query failure so the caller can fail closed:
 * never return 0 for a check that did not actually run.
 */
export async function countUnbookedInPeriod(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  periodStart: string,
  periodEnd: string,
): Promise<UnbookedInPeriod> {
  // Leg 1: never triaged. This is the canonical "att bokföra" predicate from
  // lib/worklist/categories.ts, so the number here reconciles with the
  // "N st att bokföra" badge instead of being a second, unexplainable count.
  // Served by the partial index idx_transactions_company_unbooked.
  const { count: untriaged, error: untriagedError } = await supabase
    .from('transactions')
    .select('id', { count: 'exact', head: true })
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .is('is_business', null)
    .eq('is_ignored', false)
    .gte('date', periodStart)
    .lte('date', periodEnd)
  if (untriagedError) {
    throw new Error(`untriaged transaction count failed: ${untriagedError.message}`)
  }

  // Leg 2: triaged as a business event, but no verifikat anywhere. The user has
  // already confirmed this is the company's affärshändelse, so a lock strands
  // it just as hard as an untriaged one, only with less excuse. Fetch the ids
  // and subtract the ones anchored via the non-denormalized locations.
  //
  // Paginated via fetchAllRows with a stable id order: PostgREST silently caps
  // a bare select at 1000 rows, and this candidate set is NOT bounded in
  // practice, because bulk-booked transactions keep journal_entry_id NULL
  // (anchored only via transaction_voucher_links). An unpaginated read would
  // drop every candidate past row 1000, under-counting businessUnbooked and
  // letting a period lock while genuinely unbooked affärshändelser are
  // stranded in it (BFL 5 kap 2 §).
  let candidates: Array<{ id?: string }>
  try {
    candidates = await fetchAllRows<{ id?: string }>(({ from, to }) =>
      supabase
        .from('transactions')
        .select('id')
        .eq('company_id', companyId)
        .eq('is_business', true)
        .eq('is_ignored', false)
        .is('journal_entry_id', null)
        .gte('date', periodStart)
        .lte('date', periodEnd)
        .order('id', { ascending: true })
        .range(from, to)
    )
  } catch (err) {
    throw new Error(
      `business transaction lookup failed: ${err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err)}`
    )
  }

  const candidateIds = candidates
    .map((row) => row.id)
    .filter((id): id is string => typeof id === 'string')
  if (candidateIds.length === 0) {
    return { untriaged: untriaged ?? 0, businessUnbooked: 0 }
  }

  const anchored = new Set<string>()
  for (const table of ['transaction_voucher_links', 'invoice_payments', 'supplier_invoice_payments'] as const) {
    for (let i = 0; i < candidateIds.length; i += ANCHOR_LOOKUP_CHUNK) {
      const chunk = candidateIds.slice(i, i + ANCHOR_LOOKUP_CHUNK)
      const { data, error } = await supabase
        .from(table)
        .select('transaction_id')
        .in('transaction_id', chunk)
      if (error) {
        throw new Error(`${table} anchor lookup failed: ${error.message}`)
      }
      for (const row of data ?? []) {
        const id = (row as { transaction_id?: string | null }).transaction_id
        if (id) anchored.add(id)
      }
    }
  }

  return {
    untriaged: untriaged ?? 0,
    businessUnbooked: candidateIds.filter((id) => !anchored.has(id)).length,
  }
}

/**
 * Lock a fiscal period: prevents new journal entries from being posted.
 * Requires: period exists, belongs to company, not already locked/closed.
 */
export async function lockPeriod(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  userId: string,
  fiscalPeriodId: string
): Promise<FiscalPeriod> {

  // Fetch period
  const { data: period, error: fetchError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .single()

  if (fetchError || !period) {
    throw new Error('Fiscal period not found')
  }

  if (period.is_closed) {
    throw new Error('Period is already closed')
  }

  if (period.locked_at) {
    throw new Error('Period is already locked')
  }

  // Refuse to lock while the period still holds bank transactions that would be
  // stranded. BFL 5 kap 2 § requires every affärshändelse to be bokförd in the
  // period it belongs to; once locked_at is set the enforce_period_lock trigger
  // makes these rows unbookable in place, leaving affärshändelser that can only
  // be entered by unlocking again or via a rättelse.
  //
  // Hard block, not an advisory warning with a bypass. There is no legitimate
  // "lock anyway" case: locking is a voluntary internal control with no legal
  // deadline, while the affärshändelser it would strand do have one (BFL 5 kap
  // 2 §: kontant senast nästa arbetsdag, övrigt "så snart det kan ske").
  // Every escape hatch the user could want is already an exit from the
  // predicate and is named in the message: book it, mark it privat, or mark it
  // ignored. Locking first and unlocking later is strictly worse, because the
  // unlock lands in the immutable audit_log as a control override.
  let unbooked: UnbookedInPeriod
  try {
    unbooked = await countUnbookedInPeriod(
      supabase,
      companyId,
      period.period_start,
      period.period_end,
    )
  } catch (err) {
    // Fail closed. A guard that cannot run must not wave the lock through:
    // that is exactly how the previous dead predicate went unnoticed.
    log.error('unbooked-transaction guard failed, refusing to lock', {
      companyId,
      fiscalPeriodId,
      reason: err instanceof Error ? err.message : String(err),
    })
    throw new Error(
      'Kunde inte kontrollera obokförda banktransaktioner i perioden. Perioden lämnas olåst. Försök igen.'
    )
  }

  const blockingCount = unbooked.untriaged + unbooked.businessUnbooked
  if (blockingCount > 0) {
    // Message wording is load-bearing for two separate matchers; keep both
    // phrases when editing:
    //   - "saknar bokföring" -> both lock routes map this to the
    //     PERIOD_HAS_UNBOOKED_TRANSACTIONS envelope (400) instead of a 500
    //     (app/api/bookkeeping/fiscal-periods/[id]/lock/route.ts and
    //      app/api/v1/companies/[companyId]/fiscal-periods/[id]/lock/route.ts)
    //   - /Kan inte låsa period:.*affärstransaktion/ -> inferCode() in
    //     lib/errors/get-structured-error.ts derives the same code for the
    //     MCP/agent surfaces, which have no HTTP envelope to read. The word
    //     "affärstransaktion" therefore has to appear unconditionally, not
    //     only in the breakdown clause that the untriaged-only case omits.
    // The infra message above deliberately matches neither: an unreachable DB
    // must not send an agent off remediating transactions.
    const breakdown = [
      unbooked.untriaged > 0 ? `${unbooked.untriaged} ej hanterade` : null,
      unbooked.businessUnbooked > 0
        ? `${unbooked.businessUnbooked} markerade som affärshändelse men utan verifikat`
        : null,
    ]
      .filter(Boolean)
      .join(', ')
    throw new Error(
      `Kan inte låsa period: ${blockingCount} banktransaktion(er) i perioden saknar bokföring ` +
        `(${breakdown}). Alla affärstransaktioner måste vara bokförda innan perioden låses. ` +
        `Gå till Transaktioner, bokför dem eller markera dem som privata eller ignorerade, och lås perioden därefter.`
    )
  }

  const { data: updated, error: updateError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .update({ locked_at: new Date().toISOString() })
    .eq('id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .select()
    .single()

  if (updateError || !updated) {
    throw new Error(`Failed to lock period: ${updateError?.message}`)
  }

  const result = updated as FiscalPeriod

  await eventBus.emit({
    type: 'period.locked',
    payload: { period: result, companyId, userId },
  })

  return result
}

/**
 * Unlock a fiscal period: clears `locked_at` so new entries can be posted.
 * Requires: period exists, belongs to company, is currently locked, not closed.
 */
export async function unlockPeriod(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  userId: string,
  fiscalPeriodId: string
): Promise<FiscalPeriod> {
  const { data: period, error: fetchError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .single()

  if (fetchError || !period) {
    throw new Error('Fiscal period not found')
  }

  if (period.is_closed) {
    throw new Error('Cannot unlock a closed period')
  }

  if (!period.locked_at) {
    throw new Error('Period is not locked')
  }

  const priorLockedAt = period.locked_at

  const { data: updated, error: updateError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .update({ locked_at: null })
    .eq('id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .select()
    .single()

  if (updateError || !updated) {
    throw new Error(`Failed to unlock period: ${updateError?.message}`)
  }

  const result = updated as FiscalPeriod

  // BFNAR 2013:2 kap. 8 (behandlingshistorik): unlocking a locked period is a
  // sensitive control change. Persist it to the immutable audit_log (not just
  // event_log, which has 30-day TTL) so an auditor can reconstruct who
  // unlocked which period and when, even years later.
  await supabase.from('audit_log').insert({
    user_id: userId,
    company_id: companyId,
    action: 'UPDATE',
    table_name: 'fiscal_periods',
    record_id: fiscalPeriodId,
    description: `Period unlocked: ${result.name} (${result.period_start} to ${result.period_end})`,
    old_state: { locked_at: priorLockedAt },
    new_state: { locked_at: null },
  })

  await eventBus.emit({
    type: 'period.unlocked',
    payload: { period: result, companyId, userId },
  })

  return result
}

/**
 * Close a fiscal period: marks it as permanently closed.
 * Requires: period is locked AND closing_entry_id is set (year-end must run first).
 */
export async function closePeriod(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  userId: string,
  fiscalPeriodId: string
): Promise<FiscalPeriod> {

  const { data: period, error: fetchError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .single()

  if (fetchError || !period) {
    throw new Error('Fiscal period not found')
  }

  if (period.is_closed) {
    throw new Error('Period is already closed')
  }

  if (!period.locked_at) {
    throw new Error('Period must be locked before closing')
  }

  if (!period.closing_entry_id) {
    throw new Error('Year-end closing must be executed before closing the period')
  }

  const { data: updated, error: updateError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .update({
      is_closed: true,
      closed_at: new Date().toISOString(),
    })
    .eq('id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .select()
    .single()

  if (updateError || !updated) {
    throw new Error(`Failed to close period: ${updateError?.message}`)
  }

  return updated as FiscalPeriod
}

/**
 * Create the next fiscal period following the current one.
 * Computes dates based on the current period's length (handles brutet räkenskapsår).
 * Sets previous_period_id for chain validation.
 */
export async function createNextPeriod(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  userId: string,
  currentPeriodId: string
): Promise<FiscalPeriod> {

  const { data: current, error: fetchError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('id', currentPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .single()

  if (fetchError || !current) {
    throw new Error('Current fiscal period not found')
  }

  // Compute next period start (day after current end) in pure UTC, see
  // findNextPeriod for the DST off-by-one rationale.
  const nextStart = new Date(current.period_end + 'T00:00:00Z')
  nextStart.setUTCDate(nextStart.getUTCDate() + 1)

  // After a broken first fiscal year, subsequent years should always be
  // 12 months (standard fiscal year). The first year is the only one that
  // can be longer/shorter than 12 months per BFL 3 kap.
  const nextEnd = new Date(nextStart)
  nextEnd.setUTCMonth(nextEnd.getUTCMonth() + 12)
  // Go to last day of the previous month: setUTCDate(0) rolls back into
  // the prior month's last day.
  nextEnd.setUTCDate(0)

  const nextStartStr = nextStart.toISOString().slice(0, 10)
  const nextEndStr = nextEnd.toISOString().slice(0, 10)

  // Validate period duration: subsequent periods always start on 1st of month
  const durationError = validatePeriodDuration(nextStartStr, nextEndStr, { isFirstPeriod: false })
  if (durationError) {
    throw new Error(durationError)
  }

  // Check for overlapping periods
  const { data: overlapping } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('id')
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .lte('period_start', nextEndStr)
    .gte('period_end', nextStartStr)
    .limit(1)

  if (overlapping && overlapping.length > 0) {
    throw new Error('Next fiscal period already exists or overlaps with an existing period')
  }

  // Generate name: e.g. "FY 2025" or "FY 2025/2026"
  const startYear = nextStart.getUTCFullYear()
  const endYear = nextEnd.getUTCFullYear()
  const name = startYear === endYear ? `FY ${startYear}` : `FY ${startYear}/${endYear}`

  const { data: newPeriod, error: insertError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .insert({
      company_id: companyId,
      user_id: userId,
      name,
      period_start: nextStartStr,
      period_end: nextEndStr,
      previous_period_id: currentPeriodId,
    })
    .select()
    .single()

  if (insertError || !newPeriod) {
    throw new Error(`Failed to create next period: ${insertError?.message}`)
  }

  return newPeriod as FiscalPeriod
}

/**
 * Look up the next fiscal period after the given one without creating it.
 *
 * Used by year-end closing to handle the common case where the next period
 * was already created (e.g. by SIE import, manual creation, or a previous
 * partial year-end run). Returns null when no such period exists.
 *
 * Matches first on previous_period_id chain, then falls back to a
 * period_start = (current.period_end + 1 day) lookup so periods created
 * before the chain was wired up are still recognised.
 */
export async function findNextPeriod(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  currentPeriodId: string
): Promise<FiscalPeriod | null> {
  const { data: current, error: fetchError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('id', currentPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .single()

  if (fetchError || !current) {
    return null
  }

  const { data: chained } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .eq('previous_period_id', currentPeriodId)
    .maybeSingle()

  if (chained) {
    return chained as FiscalPeriod
  }

  // UTC-only arithmetic: anchor the date string at UTC midnight, then
  // advance via setUTCDate. Using Date(string) + setDate/getDate causes an
  // off-by-one on servers in TZ+ when the day after period_end crosses a
  // DST spring-forward, because setDate(local) writes local-time fields
  // and toISOString() converts back through the shifted offset.
  const expectedStartStr = addDaysUTC(current.period_end, 1)

  const { data: byDate } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .eq('period_start', expectedStartStr)
    .maybeSingle()

  return (byDate as FiscalPeriod | null) ?? null
}

/** Add `days` to a YYYY-MM-DD string in pure UTC and return YYYY-MM-DD. */
function addDaysUTC(isoDate: string, days: number): string {
  const d = new Date(isoDate + 'T00:00:00Z')
  d.setUTCDate(d.getUTCDate() + days)
  return d.toISOString().slice(0, 10)
}

/**
 * Create a previous fiscal period before the given one.
 * Computes a 12-month period ending the day before the given period starts.
 * Updates previous_period_id chain so the given period points to the new one.
 */
export async function createPreviousPeriod(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  userId: string,
  currentPeriodId: string
): Promise<FiscalPeriod> {

  const { data: current, error: fetchError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('id', currentPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .single()

  if (fetchError || !current) {
    throw new Error('Current fiscal period not found')
  }

  // Compute previous period end (day before current start)
  const prevEnd = new Date(current.period_start + 'T12:00:00Z')
  prevEnd.setUTCDate(prevEnd.getUTCDate() - 1)

  // Compute previous period start (1st of month, 12 months before prevEnd)
  const prevStart = new Date(prevEnd)
  prevStart.setUTCMonth(prevStart.getUTCMonth() - 11)
  prevStart.setUTCDate(1)

  const prevStartStr = prevStart.toISOString().split('T')[0]
  const prevEndStr = prevEnd.toISOString().split('T')[0]

  // Validate period duration
  const durationError = validatePeriodDuration(prevStartStr, prevEndStr, { isFirstPeriod: false })
  if (durationError) {
    throw new Error(durationError)
  }

  // Check for overlapping periods
  const { data: overlapping } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('id')
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .lte('period_start', prevEndStr)
    .gte('period_end', prevStartStr)
    .limit(1)

  if (overlapping && overlapping.length > 0) {
    throw new Error('Previous fiscal period already exists or overlaps with an existing period')
  }

  // Generate name
  const startYear = prevStart.getFullYear()
  const endYear = prevEnd.getFullYear()
  const name = startYear === endYear ? `FY ${startYear}` : `FY ${startYear}/${endYear}`

  const { data: newPeriod, error: insertError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .insert({
      company_id: companyId,
      user_id: userId,
      name,
      period_start: prevStartStr,
      period_end: prevEndStr,
    })
    .select()
    .single()

  if (insertError || !newPeriod) {
    throw new Error(`Failed to create previous period: ${insertError?.message}`)
  }

  // Update the current period to point to the new one
  const { error: updateError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .update({ previous_period_id: newPeriod.id })
    .eq('id', currentPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)

  if (updateError) {
    throw new Error(`Failed to update period chain: ${updateError.message}`)
  }

  return newPeriod as FiscalPeriod
}

export type PeriodStatusValue = 'open' | 'locked' | 'closed'

export interface PeriodStatusForDate {
  period_id: string | null
  status: PeriodStatusValue
  /**
   * For `locked` status: either the period's `locked_at` timestamp (ISO) or the
   * company-wide `bookkeeping_locked_through` date (ISO), whichever applies.
   * `null` for open/closed, and `null` when `lookup_failed` is true.
   */
  lock_date: string | null
  /**
   * True when the lock lookup itself failed (PostgREST error, an overlapping
   * fiscal_periods pair breaking `.maybeSingle()`, a network blip). `status`
   * is then reported as `'locked'`, because a period whose state we could not
   * read must never be presented as writable.
   *
   * Keep the three cases distinguishable, callers treat them differently:
   *   { status: 'open',   period_id: <id>  }              -> verified open
   *   { status: 'open',   period_id: null  }              -> verified: no
   *       covering period exists at all. Not an error: the engine's
   *       ensure-period helper creates one on write.
   *   { status: 'locked', period_id: null, lookup_failed } -> unverified.
   *       Nothing is known about the date. Retryable; a genuinely locked
   *       period always carries a real period_id or lock_date.
   *
   * Deliberately an additive optional field rather than a fourth
   * `PeriodStatusValue`: the union is consumed as an exhaustive
   * `Record<PeriodStatusValue, string>` in lib/agent/intents/bokslut-step.ts,
   * so widening it would break unrelated callers at compile time.
   */
  lookup_failed?: boolean
}

/**
 * Fail-closed verdict for a lock lookup that could not be completed.
 *
 * Reported as `locked` on purpose. The alternative (`open`) is the bug this
 * exists to prevent: every caller of resolvePeriodStatusForDate uses the
 * result to decide whether a write into a period is allowed, so a swallowed
 * query error used to read as "go ahead" on the storno, MCP staging, agent
 * draft and pending-operation commit paths.
 */
function periodLookupFailed(
  companyId: string,
  date: string,
  stage: 'company_settings' | 'fiscal_periods',
  error: { message?: string } | null,
): PeriodStatusForDate {
  log.error('period status lookup failed, failing closed', {
    companyId,
    date,
    stage,
    reason: error?.message,
  })
  return { period_id: null, status: 'locked', lock_date: null, lookup_failed: true }
}

/**
 * Resolve the period status for a given affärshändelse date: answers
 * "can a verifikation with this entry_date be posted right now?" using the
 * same two-layer logic the DB triggers enforce:
 *
 *   1. company-wide bookkeeping_locked_through (covers everything on/before)
 *   2. the fiscal_period covering the date (is_closed or locked_at)
 *
 * Returned shape is the canonical `period_status` envelope threaded into MCP
 * tool responses so agents and widgets can disable writes without round-trips.
 *
 * Fails CLOSED: if either lookup errors we report `locked` with
 * `lookup_failed: true` rather than `open`. Never reintroduce a bare
 * `const { data } = await ...` here; dropping the `error` is what turned this
 * shared helper into a fail-open on every write path that consults it.
 *
 * Mirrors lib/api/v1/check-period-lock.ts (used by the v1 REST surface). The
 * two helpers share the same query pattern; if either changes, update both.
 */
export async function resolvePeriodStatusForDate(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  date: string,
): Promise<PeriodStatusForDate> {
  // Layer 1: company-wide lock date.
  const { data: settings, error: settingsError } = await supabase
    .from('company_settings')
    .select('bookkeeping_locked_through')
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .maybeSingle()
  if (settingsError) {
    // Unknown company lock date: the date could be behind it. Fail closed.
    return periodLookupFailed(companyId, date, 'company_settings', settingsError)
  }
  const lockThrough = settings?.bookkeeping_locked_through ?? null
  if (lockThrough && date <= lockThrough) {
    // Find the covering period if any: useful for widget greying. An error
    // here is deliberately non-fatal: the verdict is already `locked` on the
    // company lock date alone, so a failed refinement can only cost the
    // period_id, never flip the answer to open.
    const { data: period } = await supabase
      .from('fiscal_periods')
      .select('id')
      .eq('company_id', companyId)
      .lte('period_start', date)
      .gte('period_end', date)
      .maybeSingle()
    return { period_id: period?.id ?? null, status: 'locked', lock_date: lockThrough }
  }

  // Layer 2: fiscal period status.
  const { data: period, error: periodError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('id, is_closed, locked_at')
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .lte('period_start', date)
    .gte('period_end', date)
    .maybeSingle()

  if (periodError) {
    // Distinct from `!period` below: that is "verified, no covering period
    // exists"; this is "we do not know what period covers this date".
    return periodLookupFailed(companyId, date, 'fiscal_periods', periodError)
  }

  if (!period) {
    // No covering period: treated as open at this layer; the engine's own
    // ensure-period helper will create one. Agents should still warn the user.
    return { period_id: null, status: 'open', lock_date: null }
  }
  if (period.is_closed) {
    return { period_id: period.id, status: 'closed', lock_date: null }
  }
  if (period.locked_at) {
    return { period_id: period.id, status: 'locked', lock_date: period.locked_at }
  }
  return { period_id: period.id, status: 'open', lock_date: null }
}

/**
 * Get status summary for a fiscal period.
 */
export async function getPeriodStatus(
  supabase: SupabaseClient,
  companyId: string,
  userId: string,
  fiscalPeriodId: string
): Promise<PeriodStatus> {

  const { data: period, error: fetchError } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('*')
    .eq('id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .single()

  if (fetchError || !period) {
    throw new Error('Fiscal period not found')
  }

  // Count draft entries in this period
  const { count: draftCount } = await supabase
    .from('journal_entries')
    .select('id', { count: 'exact', head: true })
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .eq('fiscal_period_id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .eq('status', 'draft')

  // Check if next period exists via the chain pointer
  const { data: nextPeriod } = await supabase
    .from('fiscal_periods')
    .select('id')
    .eq('company_id', companyId)
    .eq('previous_period_id', fiscalPeriodId)
    .maybeSingle()

  return {
    is_locked: !!period.locked_at,
    is_closed: period.is_closed,
    has_closing_entry: !!period.closing_entry_id,
    has_opening_balances: period.opening_balances_set,
    draft_count: draftCount ?? 0,
    next_period_exists: !!nextPeriod,
  }
}