c84f951a5c2f51279277a506754b2bd94de28249
2
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Jakob Wennberg
|
7c44cef66d |
fix(supplier-invoices): freeze verifikat-critical fields once the registration entry is posted (#1249)
* fix(supplier-invoices): freeze verifikat-critical fields once the registration entry is posted invoice_date becomes the registration verifikat's entry_date and supplier_invoice_number goes into its description, but both stayed freely writable through the shared UpdateSupplierInvoiceSchema. Editing either on a booked invoice moved the invoice row while the posted entry kept its original values: the two disagreed silently, nothing landed in journal_entry_rattelse_log, and the change bypassed both sanctioned rättelse paths (BFL 5 kap 5-7 §). Adds findLockedVerifikatFields() next to the other supplier-invoice lifecycle predicates and calls it from both writers (dashboard PUT and v1 PATCH, which also covers the API-key/MCP path). Only a differing value is refused, so a full-form resend of the stored value still succeeds, and due_date, payment_reference and notes stay editable for the aged-invoice flow (#1206). Fixes #1230 * fix(supplier-invoices): make the verifikat-field lock atomic with the write Review follow-up on #1230: the lock check read the row a moment before the update ran, so a registration entry posted in between let exactly the drift the guard exists to prevent slip through. When an update moves a verifikat-critical field on a row that read as unbooked, the write is now pinned with `registration_journal_entry_id is null`. A concurrent posting therefore matches zero rows: the dashboard route returns its existing SI_EDIT_CONFLICT ("reload and try again", and the retry hits the lock with the right message), and the v1 route re-reads to answer with SI_EDIT_VERIFIKAT_LOCKED plus reason=race rather than a guess. The pin is conditional on the update actually moving one of those fields, so metadata-only edits and full-form resends of unchanged values on a booked invoice keep working (#1206). |
||
|
Jakob WennbergandClaude Opus 5
|
df29817826 |
fix(supplier-invoices): make the 'overdue' label two-way and stop it locking an invoice (#1227)
* fix(supplier-invoices): make the 'overdue' label two-way and stop it locking an invoice The daily cron flips unbooked payables past their due date to 'overdue' but nothing ever flipped them back, so aging alone pushed an invoice out of every workflow that gated on 'registered': it could not be edited (not even to extend the due date that made it overdue) and it could not be attested. Deletion was already unblocked in #1204; this closes the rest of #1206. - update_overdue_supplier_invoices() gains the inverse branch: a payable whose due date is no longer in the past returns to its resting status. Because the flip collapses 'registered' and 'approved', the un-flip needs a separate attest marker: new supplier_invoices.approved_at, backfilled from updated_at for rows currently sitting in 'approved'. - PUT /api/supplier-invoices/[id] accepts every unsettled status and recomputes the label from the due date it writes, in both directions, instead of leaving it up to a day stale. The update body carries metadata only (numbers, dates, reference, notes), never amounts or accounts, so a posted registration verifikat cannot be desynced by money. - Approve (web route, v1 API, MCP staging tool, staged commit executor) keys off approved_at instead of status === 'registered', so an aged invoice can still be attested. A still-late invoice keeps the 'overdue' label after attest: approving is not a reason to hide that the money is late. - One shared predicate in lib/supplier-invoices/lifecycle.ts for all five call sites, mirroring the SQL; new SI_EDIT_INVALID_STATUS replaces the raw Swedish string the edit gate used to return. Tests: 12 pg-real cases on the cron (5 new, covering both directions and the credit-note/fully-paid boundaries), plus route tests asserting the exact written payload for PUT and approve, and unit tests pinning the shared predicate against the SQL. npm test (11385), lint, check:guards clean. Closes #1206 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(migration): mark backfilled approved_at values as derived, not audit facts Compliance review on #1227 flagged that approved_at = updated_at could later be mistaken for an observed attestation moment (BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8 behandlingshistorik). The column comment and the migration now state plainly that pre-migration values are derived and that audit_log, written by the audit_supplier_invoices trigger, remains the record of what happened. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(supplier-invoices): guard the derived status writes with compare-and-swap Review findings on #1227. The status these paths write is derived from facts read a moment earlier, so an unconditional write could overwrite a concurrent cron flip, edit or approval with a label computed from what those changed. - PUT pins status, due_date and approved_at when (and only when) it derives a new status; zero matched rows is now a retryable 409 SI_EDIT_CONFLICT instead of a silently stale label. Metadata-only updates keep writing unconditionally: they never touch status, so they cannot clobber it. - The web approve route and the staged-commit executor gain the same pre-approval guard the v1 route already had (status in registered/overdue, approved_at IS NULL) plus a !data race check, so two concurrent approvals can no longer both stamp approved_at and both emit supplier_invoice.approved. - The v1 guard additionally pins due_date, since nextStatus is derived from it. - The list page no longer invents status/approved_at when the approve response is incomplete: it re-reads instead. An operator about to pay must not be shown a fabricated lifecycle state. - route.overdue.test.ts clears the module-level event bus like its sibling. Tests: new conflict cases for both paths (409 on PUT, refusal without an event emission on approve). npm test 11387 passed, lint 0 errors, check:guards clean, 12 pg-real cases green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |