c0ecf2fa3bebd46bdfd0169efd73b89653d1dfed
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Jakob Wennberg
|
521f437072 |
feat(migration): link migrated invoices to their registration voucher (#1463) (#2024)
Visma and Fortnox migrations now carry each invoice's source voucher reference, and after the invoice steps a core linker resolves it against the SIE-imported ledger (voucher-ref resolver by date, corroborated by the 244x credit / 151x debit amount, posted only, unreferenced only) and writes registration_journal_entry_id / journal_entry_id. Anything ambiguous, mismatched or unresolved is reported and left NULL; journal entries are never written. The arcim-migration /reconcile endpoint can relink already-migrated companies. Payment vouchers are PR B. Refs #1463 |
||
|
|
dc5079a912 |
fix(providers): stop inventing 25% VAT on migrated invoices (#1745)
* fix(providers): stop inventing 25% VAT on migrated invoices An invoice migrated from Fortnox displayed "Momsbehandling: 25 % moms" next to "Moms: 0 kr", with no line items behind it. It was not a display bug: the record really did hold vat_rate 25 and vat_amount 0. Fortnox answers GET /3/invoices with the short form, which carries no Net, no TotalVAT and no InvoiceRows; those live only on the detail form. The migration mapped the list payload alone, so `Net ?? total` made the net equal the gross, VAT derived as gross minus net came out 0, and with no rows to read a rate from, inferVatTreatment/inferVatRate fell through to their `return 'standard_25'` / `return 25` defaults. The result balanced, so nothing downstream noticed. Measured on prod: 8 712 sales invoices across 43 companies assert a rate beside 0 kr of VAT (286 MSEK of subtotal), plus 1 240 supplier invoices. None are booked, but 263 are still open, and the no-items booking fallback in invoice-entries.ts credits the full gross to 30xx and emits no 2611 line at all. Not Fortnox-only. Visma reported its VAT-inclusive TotalAmount as the ex-VAT amount and read rows via `LineTotal`/`VatRatePercent`, neither of which exists in the eAccounting schema (the real names are AmountNoVat and PercentVat), so its lines all landed at 0. Bjorn Lunden reported the gross as the net with no lines at all. Briox and WINT had the same gross-as-net fallback, and Bokio defaulted a missing totalTax to 0. - lib/providers/amounts.ts: readers that return undefined for an absent field, so "the provider says zero" stays distinct from "did not say" - every mapper: populate taxTotal and per-line taxAmount from what the payload actually states; leave the net undefined when it does not - provider-data-fetcher: hydrate the detail endpoint that every config has always declared and nothing ever called, open invoices first, within a time budget, reporting whatever it could not reach - entity-mapper: derive rate and treatment from evidence; when there is none, write vat_rate null and flag vatUnresolved instead of asserting a standard rate Existing rows are untouched; repairing them needs a separate decision. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): keep subtotal + VAT equal to the invoice total Providers state net, VAT and gross independently and they need not agree: Fortnox's Total is the amount to pay after öresavrundning while Net + TotalVAT is the unrounded Gross, so the two differ by up to 50 öre. Passing both through as stated put that gap into the invoice row, where subtotal + vat_amount no longer equalled total. The header booking path in invoice-entries.ts derives the 1510 debit from the sum of its credits, so the receivable would land a few öre away from what the customer owes while the verifikat still balanced: the same silent shape as the bug this branch fixes. resolveVatTriple now always returns a pair summing to the gross, keeping the VAT intact (it reaches the momsdeklaration) and absorbing the rounding into the net. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): address invoice detail by the configured idField Hydration built the detail path from dto.id. Björn Lundén's sales config names invoiceNumber as its idField while its mapper builds dto.id from entityId, so BL sales invoices would have been hydrated from the wrong resource, or from none. Every other provider/resource pair happens to agree on the two, which is what made the mismatch easy to miss. The config's idField is the authority, read off the raw payload, with dto.id only as the fallback. The regression test uses BL with entityId 99001 and invoiceNumber 5 so the two cannot coincide. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): store vat_rate null for migrated mixed-rate invoices resolveInvoiceVat labelled the header with the first line's rate, so an invoice carrying both 25 % and 6 % lines was recorded as a 25 % invoice. buildInvoiceWriteData already stores isMixedRate ? null : theRate for natively created invoices; migrated ones now match. The money was already right and stays right: generatePerRateLines groups per item rate, so a mixed invoice books 25 % and 6 % separately off the per-line vat_rate/vat_amount this branch fixed. Only the header label was overstating what the source said. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(providers): bound hydration against auth failures and the clock Two failure modes that only appear against a real provider. A 401 or 403 fails identically for every remaining invoice, so the pass now stops on the first one instead of issuing hundreds more doomed calls. That matters more than it looks: TokenBucketRateLimiter keys on the literal string 'global', so Fortnox's 4 req/s is a platform-wide budget shared by every company and every concurrent migration, not a per-token one. A 404 is about one invoice and does not stop the pass. The budget was checked before starting a call but never during one. The clients retry 429s and 5xx with backoff (Fortnox: 6 attempts, up to 60 s apart), so a call starting one millisecond inside the budget could still be retrying minutes later, and three concurrent ones could hold the migration past its 300 s function ceiling. Each call is now raced against the deadline; the socket is not cancelled, but control returns and the remaining invoices are reported unhydrated instead of the run dying. Both outcomes are reported as HydrationReport.abortedBy so a partial pass is visible rather than looking complete. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <invoice@arcim.io> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
cadf02e407 |
fix(migration): derive Visma invoice payment state from PaymentStatus enum (#1462)
The eAccounting /supplierinvoices LIST payload omits RemainingAmount, and reading the absence as 0 made every migrated supplier invoice fully paid (ElvaSmultron: 290/290 imported as paid, including two open payables). SupplierInvoiceApi has no IsCancelled/IsBooked/IsSent either, so the shared status derivation could never produce an open supplier invoice. - Supplier invoices: paid = PaymentStatus in (Paid=6, PaidInBank=9); bank in-flight states stay open; missing RemainingAmount now falls back to the invoice total instead of a settled-looking 0; lifecycle from Status (0=Draft, 2=Deleted) + overdue from PaymentStatus (4, 7). - Sales invoices: paid = PaymentStatus 0 (enum: 0=Paid, 1=Unpaid, 2=Overdue) with the old RemainingAmount check as fallback only. - IsCreditInvoice now maps to invoiceTypeCode '381' on both sides: credit notes have negative totals, could never satisfy 'remaining 0 && total > 0' and fell through to 'draft', surfacing on the dashboard as overdue unsent invoices. - PaymentDate now feeds lastPaymentDate so paid_at is the real payment date rather than the invoice date. Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
a49d75db77 |
fix(migration): Visma pagination + chunk-insert resilience (the '300 misslyckades' case) (#1455)
* fix(providers): paginate Visma eAccounting with $page/$pagesize eAccounting silently ignores OData $top/$skip, so every request returned page 1 and getPaginated appended the first page TotalNumberOfPages times: customers were imported in triplicate and invoice chunks hit unique violations. Also stop on an empty page so a stale Meta can never loop or duplicate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(migration): survive bad rows in entity imports instead of failing whole chunks One PostgREST insert per 500-row chunk is all-or-nothing, so a single duplicate reported every row as failed ('300 misslyckades') with no cause shown. Now: dedupe repeats within the fetched data (paging faults, source duplicates), fall back to per-row inserts when a chunk is rejected, store empty invoice numbers as NULL instead of colliding '', surface the first DB error in the result UI, and mark all-failed steps with an error icon. Sales invoices also carry remaining_amount so open invoices no longer land as settled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(migration): never per-row retry after a successful bulk insert with short read-back A succeeded statement whose .select() returns fewer rows than sent means the rows ARE in the table; retrying them one by one would duplicate every unreturned row. Pair what came back and report the tail instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(migration): count stub-insert casualties as failed and sample enrichment errors Review follow-ups: invoices dropped because their customer/supplier stub insert errored are DB failures, not matching misses; classifying them as noMatch rendered a green result row with the database error hidden. Enrichment failures now also feed errorSample. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |