2eb34412442ade678cc11b6bb15c48ea4c4bb63f
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
5769e35869 |
fix(api-v1): propagate underlag when booking via v1 categorize routes (#1564)
The v1 categorize and batch-categorize routes create the journal entry via createTransactionJournalEntry directly and never ran the shared underlag propagation, so a booking made through the API-key surface left the transaction's pinned document unanchored and matched inbox items unstamped: the same "Underlag saknas" gap #1560 closed for the dashboard, /book and bulk-book paths, surviving on this one surface. Both routes now call propagateUnderlagForBookedTransaction after the CAS write succeeds (only when this request owns the booking; skipped on partial success and lost CAS races). Best-effort by contract, same as every other caller: a propagation failure is logged inside the helper and never fails the booking. Also adds the attach-after-bulk-book unit test salvaged from the closed duplicate PR #1559: a document pinned to a bulk-booked transaction (verifikat anchored via transaction_voucher_links) is anchored against the samlingsverifikat when attached after the booking. Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
d9dddba682 |
fix(transactions): anchor the pinned document to the verifikat on booking (#1560)
A document pinned to a transaction (transactions.document_id) with no unconsumed inbox item was never anchored onto the verifikat when the transaction was booked: document_attachments.journal_entry_id stayed null and every underlag surface reported "Underlag saknas" for a booking that HAS its underlag (attach-before-book via the manual booking dialog, the 2026-08-13 user report). PR #1547 already routed /book, bulk-book and categorize through the shared propagateUnderlagForBookedTransaction helper, but that helper only walked matched inbox items. This adds a pinned-document leg to the helper, so all booking paths anchor the pin in one place: - the pin is read fresh inside the helper (not from the caller's pre-booking snapshot) so a concurrent attach is still anchored - same guard semantics as inbox docs, via the extracted anchorDocumentToJournalEntry: no-op when already anchored to this verifikat, never steal another verifikat's underlag, log-and-continue on failure (the booking is already posted; a re-run repairs the link) - the bulk-book RPC already anchors pins atomically, so the leg no-ops there Route tests cover the three plan cases: pinned doc anchored, matched inbox item stamped, and propagation failure never failing the booking. Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
8d56219c31 |
fix(inbox): booked items no longer strand in Att gora as matched-forever (#1547)
* fix(inbox): booked items no longer strand in Att gora as matched-forever A matched inbox item only left the active inbox when created_journal_entry_id was stamped, and only categorizeTransactionCore stamped it. Booking the matched transaction through any other path (the /book dialog route, bulk-book, link-to-existing-voucher) or matching a receipt to an already-booked transaction (receipt hunt approvals, attach-document, match-transaction) left the item "linked" forever, pointing at a transaction that had already left the transactions work list. Todays hunt fix (#1524) turned this July-old gap into a visible flood of stuck items. Two-part fix, because stamps alone cannot cover the reported case: created_journal_entry_id is UNIQUE (20260515090000), so on a bulk-book samlingsverifikat only one of N matched items can ever carry it. Write side: lib/transactions/inbox-underlag.ts is the shared implementation all paths now call. It links matched items' documents to the anchoring verifikat (BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap: underlag on the verifikation) and stamps created_journal_entry_id best-effort (CAS on null, unique_violation tolerated). Wired into categorize-core (replacing its inline block), /book, bulk-book, linkTransactionToJournalEntry, both attach paths (REST + pending-operation), and the inbox match-transaction handler. The attach paths and the doc-conflict guard also resolve bulk-booked transactions through transaction_voucher_links, which they previously treated as unbooked. Read side: GET /items (and /items/:id) enrich matched-but-unstamped items with matched_transaction_journal_entry_id, and the workspace derives "booked" from it. This is what clears the stuck rows already in prod without a status backfill, and what covers the N-1 samlingsverifikat items the UNIQUE constraint refuses to stamp. Bulk-book selection filters exclude such items so "Bokfor valda" no longer offers 409 fodder. scripts/backfill-inbox-booked-underlag.ts (dry-run by default) repairs the historical document->verifikat links the old paths never made. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(inbox): stamp only settled underlag, and give the backfill behandlingshistorik Both from the Swedish accounting compliance review. The consumed-stamp is now conditional on the underlag actually referencing a verifikat: stamping over a failed document link hid the item from the .is('created_journal_entry_id', null) query forever, leaving a posted verifikation without its underlag reference (BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap) and nothing left to surface or repair it. A failed link now leaves the item unstamped so re-runs and the backfill can finish the job; a document preserved on another verifikat still counts as settled. The backfill script now appends an InboxUnderlagBackfilled event per repaired transaction to processing_history (BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8): a mass repair touching underlag-to-verifikat linkage leaves a changelog trail distinguishing it from the original booking action. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * refactor(inbox): backfill writes behandlingshistorik through the shared appender From the Swedish accounting compliance review round 2: a hand-rolled processing_history insert in the backfill script could drift from the shared row shape and skip the PII validation. appendProcessingHistory now delegates to appendProcessingHistoryWithClient, which takes a caller-supplied service-role client, so standalone scripts write behandlingshistorik through the exact same code path as the app (BFNAR 2013:2 kap 8: one reconcilable change log across writers). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(inbox): leave the item unstamped when its document belongs to another verifikat Swedish accounting review round 3: refusing to steal the document was right, but stamping the item consumed anyway hid the fact that the transaction's own verifikat ended up with no underlag reference from it (BFL 5 kap 6-7 kap). The anchored-elsewhere case now leaves created_journal_entry_id null so the mismatch keeps surfacing for reconciliation, same posture as a failed link. Also documents in the backfill script header why its writes cannot land in locked periods: linkToJournalEntry's UPDATE is guarded by the enforce_period_lock DB trigger, which fires for service-role writes too. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |