chore: repo-wide bloat sweep, remove dead code and fold duplicate helpers (#2150)
* chore: repo-wide bloat sweep, remove dead code and fold duplicate helpers Remove 33 dead files, ~270 unreferenced exports/types, 13 dead i18n namespaces and 4 unused dependencies; fold byte-identical helper copies into one canonical home each (lib/utils chunk/sleep/utcDateStamp, lib/dates/iso, lib/invariants/uuid, lib/xml/escape, lib/reports/sru/format, lib/pdf/number-text, lib/browser/panel-request, lib/api/v1/body + v1ValidationError rolled out to ~55 v1 routes, booking-template schemas). No behaviour change: v1 bodies and status codes, MCP tool schemas, DB writes and money math are untouched. Naive ore rounding was deliberately not swapped for roundOre; see DECISIONS.md 2026-09-02 for the full list of things left alone on purpose. tsc, lint, 19588 unit tests and check:guards green; antipattern baseline ratcheted (naive-ore-round 622 -> 620, hand-rolled-invariant 115 -> 113). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(transactions): import RawTransaction from @/types after the ingest re-export removal CI's type ratchet (check:types, full tsconfig) caught the one test file that still imported the type through lib/transactions/ingest. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Fable 5.1
Jakob Wennberg
parent
18cbc4c30a
commit
f266c386f3
@@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ import type { InboxChannelContext, InvoiceExtractionResult } from '@/types'
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Confidence floor for surfacing an unmatched item as a probable underlag.
|
||||
* Deliberately above core-receipt-matcher's MIN_MATCH_CONFIDENCE (0.4): that
|
||||
* floor governs a picker where a human reads a ranked list and judges, whereas
|
||||
* a candidate named here is read by an agent that will reason from it. A wrong
|
||||
* Deliberately stricter than the receipt picker, which ranks candidates without
|
||||
* a hard floor: there a human reads a ranked list and judges, whereas a
|
||||
* candidate named here is read by an agent that will reason from it. A wrong
|
||||
* receipt on the wrong transaction is a mis-booking, so this surface trades
|
||||
* recall for precision and leaves the rest to the picker.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user