feat(mcp): add create_voucher + correct_entry MCP tools (#448)

* feat(mcp): add create_voucher + correct_entry MCP tools

The MCP toolset had no way to post a journal entry outside the preset
workflows (categorize_transaction, create_invoice, …). That blocks
legitimate flows the engine already supports — K3 capitalization to BAS
1010, period-end accruals, FX adjustments, prepayments, and rättelseposter
for foreign reverse-charge VAT that landed on 2641 instead of 2614/2645.

create_voucher exposes the existing createJournalEntry() primitive:
arbitrary balanced lines, optional fiscal-period auto-resolution, staged
for human approval. correct_entry exposes correctEntry() (storno + new
corrected entry per BFL 5 kap 5§) so part of a posted verifikation can be
fixed without losing the legs that were right.

Both are HIGH risk in OPERATION_RISK_TIERS — the arbitrary account/amount/
period inputs make them compliance-critical despite being structurally
similar to uncategorize_transaction (medium). Approval flow unchanged; no
auto-commit, regardless of trust level.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(mcp): address PR #448 review — voucher tools hardening

Greptile P1 + compliance bot findings, all in one pass.

commitCreateVoucher (commit.ts):
- Hardcode source_type to 'manual' instead of reading from params. A future
  direct-staging path or hand-inserted pending_operations row could
  otherwise inject 'bank_transaction'/'invoice_created'/etc. and corrupt
  the audit-trail origin.
- Re-validate balance defensively before reaching the engine, so a tampered
  params row surfaces a clean Swedish 400 instead of an opaque engine error.

gnubok_create_voucher (server.ts):
- Validate the explicit fiscal_period_id when supplied: confirm it exists,
  is open (is_closed = false), and that entry_date falls within its span.
  Without this, a closed/locked period was only caught at commit-time with
  a generic DB-trigger error.
- Throw at staging when any line targets an account that's missing from
  chart_of_accounts or marked inactive, rather than relying on the
  approver to spot the advisory flag.
- Remove source_type from the staged params blob entirely — the executor
  ignores it anyway, no point letting it travel through.
- Add a comment that the staging-time period-lock check is advisory and
  the executor is the authoritative guard, so future cleanup doesn't
  remove either as 'redundant'.

Descriptions:
- gnubok_correct_entry now explicitly notes that the storno + corrected
  entries land in the original period (defends against compliance bot's
  speculative "different period" concern recurring on future reviews).
- Both tools' tax_code field gets a note that the BAS account number
  drives momsdeklaration ruta mapping, not tax_code — guards against an
  LLM treating tax_code as the VAT-routing dial.

commitCorrectEntry (commit.ts):
- Add a comment pointing at storno-service.ts:99,102,195,198 to make the
  "uses original period and date" invariant explicit in this file.

Tests:
- +2 voucher-executors cases: source_type tampering is ignored, unbalanced
  params return 400.
- +10 new voucher-tools tests (MCP layer): unbalanced, closed explicit
  period, missing explicit period, entry_date outside period, unknown
  account, inactive account, happy path + correct_entry registration +
  unbalanced replacement.

720 tests pass in the impacted suites; full suite 2998/2998.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jakob Wennberg
2026-05-12 17:16:39 +02:00
committed by GitHub
co-authored by Claude Opus 4.7
parent ec06a2d04d
commit eb77ad50b5
10 changed files with 1292 additions and 2 deletions
+175 -1
View File
@@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ import {
createInvoiceJournalEntry,
createCreditNoteJournalEntry,
} from '@/lib/bookkeeping/invoice-entries'
import { reverseEntry } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/engine'
import { createJournalEntry, findFiscalPeriod, reverseEntry, validateBalance } from '@/lib/bookkeeping/engine'
import { correctEntry } from '@/lib/core/bookkeeping/storno-service'
import { closePeriod, lockPeriod, unlockPeriod } from '@/lib/core/bookkeeping/period-service'
import {
executeYearEndClosing,
@@ -64,6 +65,8 @@ import type {
InvoiceItem,
AccountingMethod,
CreditNote,
CreateJournalEntryLineInput,
JournalEntrySourceType,
} from '@/types'
const log = createLogger('pending-operations/commit')
@@ -1592,6 +1595,171 @@ async function commitImportSie(
}
}
// ── Phase 4: arbitrary-line bookkeeping primitives ───────────────
/**
* Normalize raw JSON line input from pending_operations.params into the
* engine's typed line shape. Trusts shape because the MCP tool already
* validates via Zod before staging — defensive coercion only.
*/
function normalizeVoucherLines(raw: unknown): CreateJournalEntryLineInput[] {
if (!Array.isArray(raw)) return []
return raw.map((l) => {
const line = l as Record<string, unknown>
return {
account_number: String(line.account_number),
debit_amount: Number(line.debit_amount) || 0,
credit_amount: Number(line.credit_amount) || 0,
line_description: line.line_description ? String(line.line_description) : undefined,
currency: line.currency ? String(line.currency) : undefined,
amount_in_currency: line.amount_in_currency !== undefined ? Number(line.amount_in_currency) : undefined,
exchange_rate: line.exchange_rate !== undefined ? Number(line.exchange_rate) : undefined,
tax_code: line.tax_code ? String(line.tax_code) : undefined,
cost_center: line.cost_center ? String(line.cost_center) : undefined,
project: line.project ? String(line.project) : undefined,
}
})
}
async function commitCreateVoucher(
supabase: SupabaseClient,
userId: string,
companyId: string,
params: Record<string, unknown>
): Promise<ExecutorResult> {
const entryDate = params.entry_date as string
const description = params.description as string
const lines = normalizeVoucherLines(params.lines)
if (!entryDate || !description || lines.length < 2) {
return { error: 'entry_date, description, and at least two lines are required', status: 400 }
}
// Re-validate balance defensively. The MCP tool already checks before
// staging, but a tampered or hand-inserted pending_operations row would
// bypass that gate. createDraftEntry runs the same check internally — this
// is for a cleaner 400 + Swedish error before reaching the engine.
const balance = validateBalance(lines)
if (!balance.valid) {
return {
error: `Verifikationen balanserar inte: debet ${balance.totalDebit} SEK, kredit ${balance.totalCredit} SEK.`,
status: 400,
}
}
// Resolve fiscal period: prefer explicit, fall back to date lookup so the
// caller can post a voucher without first calling list_fiscal_periods.
let fiscalPeriodId = params.fiscal_period_id as string | undefined
if (!fiscalPeriodId) {
const resolved = await findFiscalPeriod(supabase, companyId, entryDate)
if (!resolved) {
return {
error: `Ingen öppen räkenskapsperiod täcker datumet ${entryDate}. Öppna en period eller välj ett annat datum.`,
status: 400,
}
}
fiscalPeriodId = resolved
}
try {
const entry = await createJournalEntry(
supabase,
companyId,
userId,
{
fiscal_period_id: fiscalPeriodId,
entry_date: entryDate,
description,
// source_type is hardcoded — never trust params.source_type. The MCP
// tool stages 'manual', but a future direct-staging path could
// otherwise inject 'bank'/'invoice'/etc. and corrupt audit attribution.
source_type: 'manual' as JournalEntrySourceType,
voucher_series: (params.voucher_series as string) || undefined,
notes: (params.notes as string) || undefined,
lines,
},
'mcp_create_voucher'
)
return {
data: {
journal_entry_id: entry.id,
voucher_number: entry.voucher_number,
voucher_series: entry.voucher_series,
fiscal_period_id: fiscalPeriodId,
},
}
} catch (err) {
if (isBookkeepingError(err)) throw err
return { error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'Failed to create voucher', status: 500 }
}
}
async function commitCorrectEntry(
supabase: SupabaseClient,
userId: string,
companyId: string,
params: Record<string, unknown>
): Promise<ExecutorResult> {
const entryId = params.entry_id as string
const lines = normalizeVoucherLines(params.lines)
if (!entryId || lines.length < 2) {
return { error: 'entry_id and at least two lines are required', status: 400 }
}
// Pre-flight: verify the original is posted and its period is not locked.
// Falling into correctEntry without this returns a less helpful DB error and
// half-creates the storno before rolling back; surfacing the Swedish message
// here matches the period_locked UX everywhere else in the app.
const { data: original, error: origErr } = await supabase
.from('journal_entries')
.select('id, status, fiscal_period_id, fiscal_periods!inner(is_closed)')
.eq('id', entryId)
.eq('company_id', companyId)
.maybeSingle()
if (origErr || !original) {
return { error: 'Verifikationen hittades inte.', status: 404 }
}
if (original.status !== 'posted') {
return {
error: `Endast bokförda verifikationer kan rättas. Aktuell status: ${original.status}. Drafts redigeras direkt.`,
status: 409,
}
}
const period = original.fiscal_periods as { is_closed?: boolean } | { is_closed?: boolean }[] | null
const periodClosed = Array.isArray(period) ? period[0]?.is_closed : period?.is_closed
if (periodClosed) {
return {
error: 'Räkenskapsperioden är låst. Öppna perioden eller använd omprövning för redan inlämnade momsdeklarationer.',
status: 409,
}
}
try {
// correctEntry() posts both the storno and the corrected entry into the
// SAME fiscal_period_id and entry_date as the original (see
// lib/core/bookkeeping/storno-service.ts:99,102,195,198). So a rättelse
// made in May 2026 for a December 2025 voucher correctly lands in 2025,
// keeping that period's balances consistent. The is_closed pre-flight
// above is what blocks corrections to already-locked periods.
const result = await correctEntry(supabase, companyId, userId, entryId, lines)
return {
data: {
original_entry_id: entryId,
storno_entry_id: result.reversal.id,
corrected_entry_id: result.corrected.id,
storno_voucher_number: result.reversal.voucher_number,
corrected_voucher_number: result.corrected.voucher_number,
},
}
} catch (err) {
if (isBookkeepingError(err)) throw err
return { error: err instanceof Error ? err.message : 'Failed to correct entry', status: 500 }
}
}
// ── Public dispatcher ────────────────────────────────────────────
/**
@@ -1703,6 +1871,12 @@ export async function commitPendingOperation(
case 'import_sie':
result = await commitImportSie(supabase, userId, companyId, pendingOp.params)
break
case 'create_voucher':
result = await commitCreateVoucher(supabase, userId, companyId, pendingOp.params)
break
case 'correct_entry':
result = await commitCorrectEntry(supabase, userId, companyId, pendingOp.params)
break
default:
return {
status: 'failed',