fix(vat,documents): EU reverse-charge packs feed ruta 20/21; daily reanchor cron for floating supplier-invoice underlag (#2095)
Two user reports (Anders, 2026-08-25 + 2026-08-29): 1. The seeded standardmallar "Inkop EU-varor/-tjanster, omvand moms 25%" booked the cost on 4010/6540, which no momsdeklaration ruta reads, so the fiktiv moms filled ruta 30/48 while ruta 20/21 (inkopsvarde) stayed 0; Skatteverket rejects that (FK004, ML 13 kap). The packs now book directly on the basis accounts 4515/4535 (ACCOUNT_RUTA -> ruta 20/21); the transaction-picker path already skips its own basis emission for basis debit accounts, so no double counting. Regression test pins every reverse-charge pack to a 44xx/45xx business debit. Prod rows update via the existing pack sync cron (upsert on pack_slug). 2. A kontantmetod payment verifikat stayed "Underlag saknas" although the invoice PDF was attached and eligible on every static condition: the inline anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument silently did nothing (prod case 2026-08-28, verified in audit_log: no document_attachments update between the payment booking and the user's manual re-upload). The helper now verifies the guarded update actually matched a row instead of claiming success on zero rows, logs its silent bail branches, and a new daily cron (/api/documents/reanchor/cron) re-runs the anchor for any floating retained document with a posted verifikat, replacing the pattern of one-off repair migrations (20260727180000, 20260824150000). The sweep names the FK in its embed and is idempotent; locked/closed periods are skipped as before. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Jj6Rg1ViyFRej55gbxLVgj Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Fable 5
parent
08dbfdc5c4
commit
e113e9c099
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ import { createQueuedMockSupabase } from '@/tests/helpers'
|
||||
import {
|
||||
anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument,
|
||||
reanchorOrphanedSupplierInvoiceDocuments,
|
||||
sweepFloatingSupplierInvoiceDocuments,
|
||||
} from '../supplier-invoice-underlag'
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@ describe('anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument', () => {
|
||||
{ id: 'je-pay', status: 'posted', fiscal_period: openPeriod },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ data: null },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'doc-1' }] },
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
const anchored = await anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument(
|
||||
@@ -77,7 +78,7 @@ describe('anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument', () => {
|
||||
{ id: 'je-pay', status: 'posted', fiscal_period: openPeriod },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ data: null },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'doc-1' }] },
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
@@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ describe('anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument', () => {
|
||||
{ id: 'je-p2', status: 'posted', fiscal_period: openPeriod },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ data: null },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'doc-1' }] },
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
@@ -227,6 +228,32 @@ describe('anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument', () => {
|
||||
expect(supabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('reports a zero-row update as null: a write that never happened is not an anchor', async () => {
|
||||
// Prod case 2026-08-28 (faktura 118776): every static condition passed yet
|
||||
// the document stayed floating. The guarded update can match nothing (a
|
||||
// concurrent writer, or RLS filtering the row); claiming success then hides
|
||||
// the miss from both callers and the reconcile cron.
|
||||
const { supabase, enqueueMany } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
||||
enqueueMany([
|
||||
{
|
||||
data: {
|
||||
id: 'si-1',
|
||||
document_id: 'doc-1',
|
||||
registration_journal_entry_id: null,
|
||||
payment_journal_entry_id: 'je-pay',
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ data: { id: 'doc-1', journal_entry_id: null, is_current_version: true } },
|
||||
{ data: [] },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'je-pay', status: 'posted', fiscal_period: openPeriod }] },
|
||||
{ data: [] }, // UPDATE matched no rows
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument(supabase as unknown as SupabaseClient, 'company-1', 'si-1'),
|
||||
).resolves.toBeNull()
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('reports failure as null instead of throwing at the caller', async () => {
|
||||
const { supabase, enqueueMany } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
||||
enqueueMany([
|
||||
@@ -250,6 +277,63 @@ describe('anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument', () => {
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
describe('sweepFloatingSupplierInvoiceDocuments', () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const openPeriod = { is_closed: false, locked_at: null }
|
||||
|
||||
it('anchors every floating retained document it finds, across companies', async () => {
|
||||
const { supabase, enqueueMany } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
||||
enqueueMany([
|
||||
// Candidate scan: two invoices with floating current-version documents.
|
||||
{
|
||||
data: [
|
||||
{ id: 'si-1', company_id: 'company-1', document: { id: 'doc-1', journal_entry_id: null, is_current_version: true } },
|
||||
{ id: 'si-2', company_id: 'company-2', document: { id: 'doc-2', journal_entry_id: null, is_current_version: true } },
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
// anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument for si-1 (5 queries)
|
||||
{ data: { id: 'si-1', document_id: 'doc-1', registration_journal_entry_id: null, payment_journal_entry_id: 'je-1' } },
|
||||
{ data: { id: 'doc-1', journal_entry_id: null, is_current_version: true } },
|
||||
{ data: [] },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'je-1', status: 'posted', fiscal_period: openPeriod }] },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'doc-1' }] },
|
||||
// anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument for si-2: its only verifikat is locked.
|
||||
{ data: { id: 'si-2', document_id: 'doc-2', registration_journal_entry_id: null, payment_journal_entry_id: 'je-2' } },
|
||||
{ data: { id: 'doc-2', journal_entry_id: null, is_current_version: true } },
|
||||
{ data: [] },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'je-2', status: 'posted', fiscal_period: { is_closed: true, locked_at: null } }] },
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await sweepFloatingSupplierInvoiceDocuments(
|
||||
supabase as unknown as SupabaseClient,
|
||||
)
|
||||
expect(result).toEqual({ candidates: 2, anchored: 1 })
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('returns zeros and touches nothing when no document is floating', async () => {
|
||||
const { supabase, enqueueMany } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
||||
enqueueMany([{ data: [] }])
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await sweepFloatingSupplierInvoiceDocuments(
|
||||
supabase as unknown as SupabaseClient,
|
||||
)
|
||||
expect(result).toEqual({ candidates: 0, anchored: 0 })
|
||||
expect(supabase.from).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('survives a failed candidate scan without throwing', async () => {
|
||||
const { supabase, enqueueMany } = createQueuedMockSupabase()
|
||||
enqueueMany([{ error: { message: 'relation walk failed' } }])
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
sweepFloatingSupplierInvoiceDocuments(supabase as unknown as SupabaseClient),
|
||||
).resolves.toEqual({ candidates: 0, anchored: 0 })
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
describe('reanchorOrphanedSupplierInvoiceDocuments', () => {
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
vi.clearAllMocks()
|
||||
@@ -272,7 +356,7 @@ describe('reanchorOrphanedSupplierInvoiceDocuments', () => {
|
||||
{
|
||||
data: [{ id: 'je-pay', status: 'posted', fiscal_period: { is_closed: false, locked_at: null } }],
|
||||
},
|
||||
{ data: null },
|
||||
{ data: [{ id: 'doc-1' }] },
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -78,9 +78,21 @@ export async function anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument(
|
||||
payment_journal_entry_id: string | null
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
if (!entryId) return null
|
||||
if (!entryId) {
|
||||
// The invoice HAS a floating retained document but no verifikat that can
|
||||
// take it. In the payment routes (which call this right after posting)
|
||||
// that is an anomaly worth a log line: prod case 2026-08-28 (Anders,
|
||||
// faktura 118776) stayed "Underlag saknas" through exactly this kind of
|
||||
// silent bail, and nothing recorded which branch gave up.
|
||||
log.warn('supplier invoice document is floating but no verifikat can anchor it', {
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
supplierInvoiceId,
|
||||
documentId: doc.id,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return null
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const { error } = await supabase
|
||||
const { data: updatedRows, error } = await supabase
|
||||
.from('document_attachments')
|
||||
.update({ journal_entry_id: entryId })
|
||||
.eq('id', doc.id)
|
||||
@@ -89,6 +101,7 @@ export async function anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument(
|
||||
// read above. Never steal a document that already serves a verifikat.
|
||||
.is('journal_entry_id', null)
|
||||
.eq('is_current_version', true)
|
||||
.select('id')
|
||||
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
log.warn('failed to anchor supplier invoice document to verifikat', {
|
||||
@@ -100,6 +113,19 @@ export async function anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument(
|
||||
})
|
||||
return null
|
||||
}
|
||||
// The guarded update can match zero rows (a concurrent writer got there
|
||||
// first, or RLS filtered the row). That is NOT a successful anchor: report
|
||||
// null so callers and the reconcile cron treat the document as still
|
||||
// floating instead of trusting a write that never happened.
|
||||
if (!updatedRows || updatedRows.length === 0) {
|
||||
log.warn('anchor update matched no rows; document left floating', {
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
supplierInvoiceId,
|
||||
documentId: doc.id,
|
||||
journalEntryId: entryId,
|
||||
})
|
||||
return null
|
||||
}
|
||||
return entryId
|
||||
} catch (err) {
|
||||
log.warn('anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument threw', {
|
||||
@@ -193,6 +219,69 @@ async function pickAnchorEntry(
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns the number of documents re-anchored.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export interface FloatingDocumentSweepResult {
|
||||
/** Invoices whose floating retained document was examined. */
|
||||
candidates: number
|
||||
/** Documents actually anchored to a verifikat this run. */
|
||||
anchored: number
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Prod-wide self-heal for retained supplier-invoice documents that stayed
|
||||
* floating although the invoice has a posted verifikat: the inline anchoring
|
||||
* in the payment routes is best-effort by design (never throws, the booking is
|
||||
* already committed), so a transient failure there strands the document until
|
||||
* something retries. Historically that "something" was a hand-written repair
|
||||
* migration (20260727180000, 20260824150000); this makes the retry a standing
|
||||
* daily cron instead. Prod case 2026-08-28 (Anders, faktura 118776): payment
|
||||
* verifikat posted, invoice document eligible on every static condition, yet
|
||||
* the inline anchor did nothing and no log recorded why, so the verifikat
|
||||
* showed "Underlag saknas" until the user re-uploaded the PDF by hand.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Anchoring an already-shown-but-floating document is strictly an improvement
|
||||
* (it puts the file behind the WORM deletion guard and satisfies BFL 5 kap
|
||||
* 7 §), and anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument never moves an anchored document,
|
||||
* so re-running this sweep is idempotent. Locked/closed periods are skipped by
|
||||
* pickAnchorEntry, matching the repair migrations.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Meant to run under the service-role client from a cron: RLS would otherwise
|
||||
* scope the candidate scan to one user's companies.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export async function sweepFloatingSupplierInvoiceDocuments(
|
||||
supabase: SupabaseClient,
|
||||
opts: { limit?: number } = {},
|
||||
): Promise<FloatingDocumentSweepResult> {
|
||||
const limit = Math.min(Math.max(opts.limit ?? 200, 1), 1000)
|
||||
|
||||
// FK named explicitly: with an ambiguous relationship PostgREST rejects the
|
||||
// embed and the sweep would silently see zero candidates (the #2022 lesson).
|
||||
const { data, error } = await supabase
|
||||
.from('supplier_invoices')
|
||||
.select(
|
||||
'id, company_id, document:document_attachments!supplier_invoices_document_id_fkey!inner(id, journal_entry_id, is_current_version)',
|
||||
)
|
||||
.not('document_id', 'is', null)
|
||||
.or('payment_journal_entry_id.not.is.null,registration_journal_entry_id.not.is.null')
|
||||
.is('document.journal_entry_id', null)
|
||||
.eq('document.is_current_version', true)
|
||||
.limit(limit)
|
||||
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
log.warn('floating-document sweep query failed', { reason: error.message })
|
||||
return { candidates: 0, anchored: 0 }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const rows = (data ?? []) as unknown as Array<{ id: string; company_id: string }>
|
||||
let anchored = 0
|
||||
for (const row of rows) {
|
||||
if (await anchorSupplierInvoiceDocument(supabase, row.company_id, row.id)) anchored++
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (rows.length > 0) {
|
||||
log.info('floating-document sweep complete', { candidates: rows.length, anchored })
|
||||
}
|
||||
return { candidates: rows.length, anchored }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export async function reanchorOrphanedSupplierInvoiceDocuments(
|
||||
supabase: SupabaseClient,
|
||||
companyId: string,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user