fix(bookkeeping): settle öre differences to 3740 and improve supplier-invoice matching (#699)
Whole-krona Bankgiro/Swish payments of öre-bearing invoices were stranded as partially_paid forever (e.g. 11 231 paid on an 11 231,25 invoice left 0,25 kr open). Book the sub-krona residual to BAS 3740 (Öres- och kronutjämning) and settle the invoice in full, on both the supplier- and customer-invoice match flows. New shared pure helpers buildSupplierPaymentClearingLines + planSupplierPayment mirror the customer-side primitives; routing preview and commit through the same builder also fixes two pre-existing preview↔commit drifts (payment account + line descriptions). Öre absorption is accrual-only — cash entries book the full invoice, so absorbing there would hide a 1930 discrepancy. Also improves supplier-invoice ↔ bank matching: - Pass-3 date window now spans [invoice_date-5, due_date+5] instead of due_date ±5, so early payments auto-match; an ambiguity guard demotes non-unique amount matches to suggestions. - New retroactive matcher (on supplier_invoice.registered/.approved) surfaces the settling bank payment when the invoice is registered after the payment was imported. Matches are written as suggestions for one-click confirm-to-book, never silently auto-booked. Tests: new unit tests for both pure helpers; extended matching, handler, customer öre, and route suites. Full suite green (407 files / 5364 tests). Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 4.8
parent
4dfd790de5
commit
b38b3d0230
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ describe('planInvoicePayment', () => {
|
||||
newRemaining: 0,
|
||||
isFullyPaid: true,
|
||||
newStatus: 'paid',
|
||||
oreSettled: false,
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
||||
import { planSupplierPayment } from '@/lib/invoices/apply-supplier-payment'
|
||||
|
||||
describe('planSupplierPayment', () => {
|
||||
const invoice = { total: 11231.25, paid_amount: 0, remaining_amount: 11231.25 }
|
||||
|
||||
it('settles in full and flags öre when a whole-krona payment is a sub-krona short (absorbOreRounding)', () => {
|
||||
const r = planSupplierPayment(invoice, 11231, { absorbOreRounding: true })
|
||||
expect(r.ok).toBe(true)
|
||||
if (r.ok) {
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newStatus).toBe('paid')
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newRemaining).toBe(0)
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newPaidAmount).toBe(11231.25) // the AP, not the cash, is fully cleared
|
||||
expect(r.plan.oreSettled).toBe(true)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('accepts a sub-krona OVERpayment as öresavrundning instead of rejecting it', () => {
|
||||
const inv = { total: 11231, paid_amount: 0, remaining_amount: 11231 }
|
||||
const r = planSupplierPayment(inv, 11231.25, { absorbOreRounding: true })
|
||||
expect(r.ok).toBe(true)
|
||||
if (r.ok) {
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newStatus).toBe('paid')
|
||||
expect(r.plan.oreSettled).toBe(true)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('leaves a ≥1 kr shortfall as a genuine partial', () => {
|
||||
const r = planSupplierPayment(invoice, 5000, { absorbOreRounding: true })
|
||||
expect(r.ok).toBe(true)
|
||||
if (r.ok) {
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newStatus).toBe('partially_paid')
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newRemaining).toBe(6231.25)
|
||||
expect(r.plan.oreSettled).toBe(false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('rejects an overpayment beyond the 1 kr öre band', () => {
|
||||
const r = planSupplierPayment(invoice, 12000, { absorbOreRounding: true })
|
||||
expect(r.ok).toBe(false)
|
||||
if (!r.ok) {
|
||||
expect(r.code).toBe('MATCH_SI_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING')
|
||||
expect(r.details.remaining_amount).toBe(11231.25)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('exact payment settles fully without flagging öre', () => {
|
||||
const inv = { total: 1000, paid_amount: 0, remaining_amount: 1000 }
|
||||
const r = planSupplierPayment(inv, 1000, { absorbOreRounding: true })
|
||||
expect(r.ok).toBe(true)
|
||||
if (r.ok) {
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newStatus).toBe('paid')
|
||||
expect(r.plan.oreSettled).toBe(false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
describe('without öre absorption (default — preserves legacy behaviour)', () => {
|
||||
it('strands the sub-krona remainder as a partial', () => {
|
||||
const r = planSupplierPayment(invoice, 11231)
|
||||
expect(r.ok).toBe(true)
|
||||
if (r.ok) {
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newStatus).toBe('partially_paid')
|
||||
expect(r.plan.newRemaining).toBe(0.25)
|
||||
expect(r.plan.oreSettled).toBe(false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('rejects even a sub-krona overpayment (strict half-öre tolerance)', () => {
|
||||
const inv = { total: 11231, paid_amount: 0, remaining_amount: 11231 }
|
||||
const r = planSupplierPayment(inv, 11231.25)
|
||||
expect(r.ok).toBe(false)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
@@ -194,4 +194,64 @@ describe('findSupplierInvoiceMatch', () => {
|
||||
// "AB" is filtered out (length < 3), so no name match
|
||||
expect(result).toBeNull()
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Pass 3, widened window: early payments (the reported RosholmDell case)
|
||||
it('auto-matches an EARLY exact payment near the invoice date, weeks before due', () => {
|
||||
// Paid 2026-06-08, invoice issued 2026-06-05, due 2026-07-05 (27 days out).
|
||||
// The old due-date-only ±5d window missed this; the issue→due window catches it.
|
||||
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: -29890, date: '2026-06-08', description: 'RosholmDell Advo BG 0000007746514' })
|
||||
const inv = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'registered',
|
||||
remaining_amount: 29890,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2026-06-05',
|
||||
due_date: '2026-07-05',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const result = findSupplierInvoiceMatch(tx, [inv])
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).not.toBeNull()
|
||||
expect(result!.confidence).toBe(0.85)
|
||||
expect(result!.matchMethod).toBe('amount_date')
|
||||
expect(result!.ambiguous).toBeFalsy()
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('still matches a few days AFTER the due date', () => {
|
||||
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: -29890, date: '2026-07-09' }) // due + 4d
|
||||
const inv = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'registered',
|
||||
remaining_amount: 29890,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2026-06-05',
|
||||
due_date: '2026-07-05',
|
||||
})
|
||||
expect(findSupplierInvoiceMatch(tx, [inv])!.matchMethod).toBe('amount_date')
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('flags amount_date as AMBIGUOUS when two invoices share the amount in-window', () => {
|
||||
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: -29890, date: '2026-06-08', description: 'bankgiro-betalning' })
|
||||
const a = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
id: 'inv-a', status: 'registered', remaining_amount: 29890,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2026-06-05', due_date: '2026-07-05',
|
||||
})
|
||||
const b = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
id: 'inv-b', status: 'registered', remaining_amount: 29890,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2026-06-04', due_date: '2026-07-04',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const result = findSupplierInvoiceMatch(tx, [a, b])
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).not.toBeNull()
|
||||
expect(result!.confidence).toBe(0.85)
|
||||
expect(result!.ambiguous).toBe(true) // caller must demote to a suggestion
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('uses an invoice_date-only window when there is no due_date', () => {
|
||||
const tx = makeTransaction({ amount: -29890, date: '2026-06-20' }) // 15 days after issue
|
||||
const inv = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'registered',
|
||||
remaining_amount: 29890,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2026-06-05',
|
||||
due_date: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
expect(findSupplierInvoiceMatch(tx, [inv])!.matchMethod).toBe('amount_date')
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
|
||||
* guard rail #9 — identical to the route's previous `Math.round(x*100)/100`
|
||||
* except on exact-half-öre amounts, where `roundOre` rounds correctly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
import { roundOre, ORE_TOLERANCE } from '@/lib/money'
|
||||
import { roundOre, ORE_TOLERANCE, ORE_ROUNDING_SETTLEMENT_MAX } from '@/lib/money'
|
||||
|
||||
/** Half an öre — anything over the remaining by more than this is a real overpayment. */
|
||||
export const PAYMENT_OVERSHOOT_TOLERANCE = ORE_TOLERANCE
|
||||
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ export interface InvoicePaymentPlan {
|
||||
newRemaining: number
|
||||
isFullyPaid: boolean
|
||||
newStatus: 'paid' | 'partially_paid'
|
||||
/** True when a sub-krona öre residual was absorbed (full settlement of an
|
||||
* inexact amount) — the 3740 line carries it. Always false unless the caller
|
||||
* opts in via `absorbOreRounding`. */
|
||||
oreSettled: boolean
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export type PlanInvoicePaymentResult =
|
||||
@@ -51,11 +55,17 @@ export type PlanInvoicePaymentResult =
|
||||
export function planInvoicePayment(
|
||||
invoice: InvoicePaymentTotals,
|
||||
paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency: number,
|
||||
opts?: { absorbOreRounding?: boolean },
|
||||
): PlanInvoicePaymentResult {
|
||||
const absorbOre = opts?.absorbOreRounding === true
|
||||
const currentRemaining =
|
||||
invoice.remaining_amount ?? invoice.total - (invoice.paid_amount || 0)
|
||||
|
||||
if (paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency > currentRemaining + PAYMENT_OVERSHOOT_TOLERANCE) {
|
||||
// A rounded-up whole-krona payment is not an overpayment — widen the reject
|
||||
// band to one krona when absorbing öre; otherwise keep the strict half-öre
|
||||
// float tolerance the three legacy callers rely on.
|
||||
const overshootTolerance = absorbOre ? ORE_ROUNDING_SETTLEMENT_MAX : PAYMENT_OVERSHOOT_TOLERANCE
|
||||
if (paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency > currentRemaining + overshootTolerance) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
ok: false,
|
||||
code: 'MATCH_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING',
|
||||
@@ -67,6 +77,23 @@ export function planInvoicePayment(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const diff = roundOre(currentRemaining - paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency)
|
||||
|
||||
// Within the öre band (and absorbing) → settle in full; the 3740 line carries
|
||||
// the residual. Covers both a short whole-krona payment and a rounded-up one.
|
||||
if (absorbOre && Math.abs(diff) < ORE_ROUNDING_SETTLEMENT_MAX) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
plan: {
|
||||
newPaidAmount: roundOre((invoice.paid_amount || 0) + currentRemaining),
|
||||
newRemaining: 0,
|
||||
isFullyPaid: true,
|
||||
newStatus: 'paid',
|
||||
oreSettled: Math.abs(diff) >= ORE_TOLERANCE,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const newPaidAmount = roundOre((invoice.paid_amount || 0) + paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency)
|
||||
const newRemaining = Math.max(0, roundOre(currentRemaining - paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency))
|
||||
const isFullyPaid = newRemaining <= 0
|
||||
@@ -78,6 +105,7 @@ export function planInvoicePayment(
|
||||
newRemaining,
|
||||
isFullyPaid,
|
||||
newStatus: isFullyPaid ? 'paid' : 'partially_paid',
|
||||
oreSettled: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Single source of truth for applying a payment amount to a SUPPLIER invoice —
|
||||
* the supplier-side mirror of `planInvoicePayment` (@/lib/invoices/apply-invoice-payment).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Computes the new paid/remaining/status and REJECTS overpayment before the
|
||||
* caller creates any journal entry, so a doomed match never burns a voucher
|
||||
* number. The supplier match route previously inlined this math (and its
|
||||
* overshoot guard) directly; centralizing it keeps the two off-by-one tolerances
|
||||
* (overshoot vs öre absorption) honest and unit-testable without a DB.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* # Öresavrundning (opt-in)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When `absorbOreRounding` is set (callers pass it only for same-currency SEK
|
||||
* settlements), a payment within `ORE_ROUNDING_SETTLEMENT_MAX` of the remaining
|
||||
* — short OR over — settles the invoice IN FULL; the residual is booked to BAS
|
||||
* 3740 by the line builder (`buildSupplierPaymentClearingLines`). Without the
|
||||
* flag the behaviour is the strict legacy one (half-öre overshoot tolerance,
|
||||
* any real shortfall left as a partial), preserving every other caller.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* FX: `paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency` MUST already be in the invoice's currency.
|
||||
* The caller owns any conversion, keeping this helper FX-agnostic.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
import { roundOre, ORE_TOLERANCE, ORE_ROUNDING_SETTLEMENT_MAX } from '@/lib/money'
|
||||
|
||||
export interface SupplierPaymentTotals {
|
||||
total: number
|
||||
paid_amount?: number | null
|
||||
remaining_amount?: number | null
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export interface SupplierPaymentPlan {
|
||||
newPaidAmount: number
|
||||
newRemaining: number
|
||||
isFullyPaid: boolean
|
||||
newStatus: 'paid' | 'partially_paid'
|
||||
/** True when an öre residual was absorbed (full settlement of an inexact
|
||||
* amount). Lets callers/tests assert the 3740 path without re-deriving it. */
|
||||
oreSettled: boolean
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export type PlanSupplierPaymentResult =
|
||||
| { ok: true; plan: SupplierPaymentPlan }
|
||||
| {
|
||||
ok: false
|
||||
code: 'MATCH_SI_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING'
|
||||
details: { transaction_amount: number; remaining_amount: number; excess: number }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function planSupplierPayment(
|
||||
invoice: SupplierPaymentTotals,
|
||||
paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency: number,
|
||||
opts?: { absorbOreRounding?: boolean },
|
||||
): PlanSupplierPaymentResult {
|
||||
const absorbOre = opts?.absorbOreRounding === true
|
||||
const currentRemaining =
|
||||
invoice.remaining_amount ?? invoice.total - (invoice.paid_amount || 0)
|
||||
|
||||
// Overpayment past the tolerated band is a real overshoot → reject. With öre
|
||||
// absorption the band is one krona (a rounded-up whole-krona payment is not an
|
||||
// overpayment); otherwise it's the strict half-öre float tolerance.
|
||||
const overshootTolerance = absorbOre ? ORE_ROUNDING_SETTLEMENT_MAX : ORE_TOLERANCE
|
||||
if (paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency > currentRemaining + overshootTolerance) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
ok: false,
|
||||
code: 'MATCH_SI_AMOUNT_EXCEEDS_REMAINING',
|
||||
details: {
|
||||
transaction_amount: paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency,
|
||||
remaining_amount: roundOre(currentRemaining),
|
||||
excess: roundOre(paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency - currentRemaining),
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const diff = roundOre(currentRemaining - paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency)
|
||||
|
||||
// Within the öre band (and absorbing) → settle in full; the 3740 line carries
|
||||
// the residual. Covers both a short whole-krona payment and a rounded-up one.
|
||||
if (absorbOre && Math.abs(diff) < ORE_ROUNDING_SETTLEMENT_MAX) {
|
||||
const newPaidAmount = roundOre((invoice.paid_amount || 0) + currentRemaining)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
plan: {
|
||||
newPaidAmount,
|
||||
newRemaining: 0,
|
||||
isFullyPaid: true,
|
||||
newStatus: 'paid',
|
||||
// Only flag öre settlement when there is an actual residual to book —
|
||||
// an exact payment needs no 3740 line.
|
||||
oreSettled: Math.abs(diff) >= ORE_TOLERANCE,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const newPaidAmount = roundOre((invoice.paid_amount || 0) + paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency)
|
||||
const newRemaining = Math.max(0, roundOre(currentRemaining - paymentAmountInInvoiceCurrency))
|
||||
const isFullyPaid = newRemaining <= 0
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
ok: true,
|
||||
plan: {
|
||||
newPaidAmount,
|
||||
newRemaining,
|
||||
isFullyPaid,
|
||||
newStatus: isFullyPaid ? 'paid' : 'partially_paid',
|
||||
oreSettled: false,
|
||||
},
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -4,11 +4,18 @@
|
||||
* 4-pass matching algorithm (ordered by confidence):
|
||||
* 1. Payment reference/OCR exact match → 0.98
|
||||
* 2. Exact amount + bankgiro/plusgiro match → 0.92
|
||||
* 3. Exact amount + date ±5 days → 0.85
|
||||
* 3. Exact amount + payment date within [invoice_date − 5, due_date + 5] → 0.85
|
||||
* 4. Fuzzy amount (±0.01) + supplier name in description → 0.70
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Auto-match threshold: ≥0.85 → applied automatically
|
||||
* Suggestion threshold: 0.70–0.85 → stored as potential_supplier_invoice_id
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The Pass-3 window spans the whole credit period (issue → due, ±5d) so an
|
||||
* early payment — common when a bank pays a Bankgiro the day the invoice lands,
|
||||
* weeks before the due date — still auto-matches. To contain the false-positive
|
||||
* risk of the wider window, a Pass-3 hit where more than one invoice matches the
|
||||
* same amount in-window is flagged `ambiguous`; callers must downgrade an
|
||||
* ambiguous auto-match to a mere suggestion.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
import type { Transaction, SupplierInvoice } from '@/types'
|
||||
@@ -17,6 +24,13 @@ export interface SupplierInvoiceMatch {
|
||||
supplierInvoice: SupplierInvoice
|
||||
confidence: number
|
||||
matchMethod: 'payment_reference' | 'amount_bankgiro' | 'amount_date' | 'fuzzy_name'
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* True when this is a Pass-3 (amount + date-window) match but more than one
|
||||
* invoice matched the same amount in-window — the date heuristic alone can't
|
||||
* disambiguate. Callers must treat an ambiguous 0.85 as a suggestion, never an
|
||||
* auto-link. Undefined/false for the unique passes (OCR, bankgiro).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ambiguous?: boolean
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -43,6 +57,10 @@ export function findSupplierInvoiceMatch(
|
||||
if (txAmount === 0) return null
|
||||
|
||||
let bestMatch: SupplierInvoiceMatch | null = null
|
||||
// How many invoices matched the exact amount within their date window. >1
|
||||
// makes a Pass-3 (amount_date) winner ambiguous — the date can't pick between
|
||||
// same-amount invoices, so the caller must not auto-link it.
|
||||
let amountDateMatchCount = 0
|
||||
|
||||
for (const invoice of unpaidInvoices) {
|
||||
// Only match against registered/approved invoices with remaining amount
|
||||
@@ -81,13 +99,21 @@ export function findSupplierInvoiceMatch(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Pass 3: Exact amount + date ±5 days → 0.85
|
||||
if (amountMatch && invoice.due_date) {
|
||||
const txDate = new Date(transaction.date)
|
||||
const dueDate = new Date(invoice.due_date)
|
||||
const diffDays = Math.abs((txDate.getTime() - dueDate.getTime()) / (1000 * 60 * 60 * 24))
|
||||
// Pass 3: Exact amount + payment date within the credit period → 0.85.
|
||||
// Window = [invoice_date − 5, due_date + 5]; when only one date is known,
|
||||
// span ~30 days on the missing side (typical net terms). This catches early
|
||||
// payments (paid near the invoice date, weeks before due) that a due-date-
|
||||
// only window missed.
|
||||
if (amountMatch && (invoice.invoice_date || invoice.due_date)) {
|
||||
const DAY = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000
|
||||
const txMs = new Date(transaction.date).getTime()
|
||||
const invoiceMs = invoice.invoice_date ? new Date(invoice.invoice_date).getTime() : null
|
||||
const dueMs = invoice.due_date ? new Date(invoice.due_date).getTime() : null
|
||||
const startMs = invoiceMs !== null ? invoiceMs - 5 * DAY : (dueMs as number) - 35 * DAY
|
||||
const endMs = dueMs !== null ? dueMs + 5 * DAY : (invoiceMs as number) + 35 * DAY
|
||||
|
||||
if (diffDays <= 5) {
|
||||
if (txMs >= startMs && txMs <= endMs) {
|
||||
amountDateMatchCount++
|
||||
const confidence = 0.85
|
||||
if (!bestMatch || confidence > bestMatch.confidence) {
|
||||
bestMatch = {
|
||||
@@ -128,5 +154,12 @@ export function findSupplierInvoiceMatch(
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A Pass-3 winner is only trustworthy enough to auto-link when its amount was
|
||||
// unique in-window. If several invoices shared the amount, the date can't
|
||||
// disambiguate — flag it so the caller demotes it to a suggestion.
|
||||
if (bestMatch && bestMatch.matchMethod === 'amount_date' && amountDateMatchCount > 1) {
|
||||
bestMatch.ambiguous = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return bestMatch
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user