fix(bookkeeping): tiebreak same-date vouchers in the date-sort direction (#1032)
The verifikat list RPC ordered entry_date in the requested direction but always tiebroke voucher_series/voucher_number ascending, so under the default date-descending view every multi-voucher day read the wrong way (A10, A11, A12 inside a descending list). The RPC now flips the tiebreaker with p_sort_date, and the route's direct-query fallback gains the matching voucher_series tiebreak so both paths agree. Fixes #972 Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Fable 5
parent
f0907da7e9
commit
90e4f668c9
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ describe('list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related: draft + correction filters',
|
||||
voucherNumber: number
|
||||
description: string
|
||||
voucherSeries?: string
|
||||
entryDate?: string
|
||||
reversesId?: string
|
||||
correctionOfId?: string
|
||||
withLines?: boolean
|
||||
@@ -35,7 +36,7 @@ describe('list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related: draft + correction filters',
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.journal_entries
|
||||
(id, user_id, company_id, fiscal_period_id, voucher_number, voucher_series,
|
||||
entry_date, description, source_type, status, reverses_id, correction_of_id)
|
||||
VALUES ($1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$11,'2026-06-01',$6,$7,$8,$9,$10)`,
|
||||
VALUES ($1,$2,$3,$4,$5,$11,$12,$6,$7,$8,$9,$10)`,
|
||||
[
|
||||
id,
|
||||
p.userId,
|
||||
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ describe('list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related: draft + correction filters',
|
||||
p.reversesId ?? null,
|
||||
p.correctionOfId ?? null,
|
||||
p.voucherSeries ?? 'A',
|
||||
p.entryDate ?? '2026-06-01',
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
if (p.withLines) await insertBalancedLines(id)
|
||||
@@ -63,15 +65,16 @@ describe('list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related: draft + correction filters',
|
||||
collapse?: boolean
|
||||
series?: string | null
|
||||
limit?: number
|
||||
sortDate?: 'asc' | 'desc'
|
||||
} = {},
|
||||
) {
|
||||
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{
|
||||
entry: { id: string; voucher_series: string }
|
||||
entry: { id: string; voucher_series: string; voucher_number: number }
|
||||
total_count: string
|
||||
}>(
|
||||
`SELECT entry, total_count
|
||||
FROM list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related(
|
||||
$1, $2, true, $3, NULL, NULL, 'desc', $6, 0, $4, $5, $7)`,
|
||||
$1, $2, true, $3, NULL, NULL, $8, $6, 0, $4, $5, $7)`,
|
||||
[
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
periodId,
|
||||
@@ -80,6 +83,7 @@ describe('list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related: draft + correction filters',
|
||||
opts.collapse ?? false,
|
||||
opts.limit ?? 100,
|
||||
opts.series ?? null,
|
||||
opts.sortDate ?? 'desc',
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
return rows
|
||||
@@ -149,4 +153,34 @@ describe('list_fiscal_period_entries_with_related: draft + correction filters',
|
||||
expect(firstPage).toHaveLength(2)
|
||||
expect(Number(firstPage[0]!.total_count)).toBe(3)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('tiebreaks same-date vouchers in the date-sort direction (#972)', async () => {
|
||||
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
||||
|
||||
// The exact scenario from #972: several days carry more than one voucher.
|
||||
const spec: Array<[number, string]> = [
|
||||
[4, '2026-06-01'],
|
||||
[5, '2026-06-07'],
|
||||
[6, '2026-06-07'],
|
||||
[7, '2026-06-07'],
|
||||
[8, '2026-06-08'],
|
||||
[9, '2026-06-09'],
|
||||
[10, '2026-06-10'],
|
||||
[11, '2026-06-10'],
|
||||
[12, '2026-06-10'],
|
||||
[13, '2026-06-11'],
|
||||
]
|
||||
for (const [n, entryDate] of spec) {
|
||||
await insertEntry({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId, status: 'posted', sourceType: 'manual', voucherNumber: n, entryDate, withLines: true, description: `A${n}` })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Date-descending (the default list view): same-date vouchers must also
|
||||
// descend, so the whole column reads 13..4 with no zig-zag inside a day.
|
||||
const desc = await callRpc(companyId, fiscalPeriodId, { sortDate: 'desc' })
|
||||
expect(desc.map((r) => r.entry.voucher_number)).toEqual([13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4])
|
||||
|
||||
// Date-ascending: fully chronological registration order.
|
||||
const asc = await callRpc(companyId, fiscalPeriodId, { sortDate: 'asc' })
|
||||
expect(asc.map((r) => r.entry.voucher_number)).toEqual([4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13])
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -109,8 +109,11 @@ export const GET = withRouteContext('bookkeeping.journal_entries.list', async (r
|
||||
.order('voucher_series', { ascending: voucherAscending })
|
||||
.order('voucher_number', { ascending: voucherAscending })
|
||||
} else if (sortDate === 'asc' || sortDate === 'desc' || sortBy === 'date_asc' || sortBy === 'date_desc') {
|
||||
// Tiebreak same-date vouchers in the SAME direction as the date sort, and
|
||||
// by series before number so the order matches the RPC path (#972).
|
||||
query = query
|
||||
.order('entry_date', { ascending: dateAscending })
|
||||
.order('voucher_series', { ascending: dateAscending })
|
||||
.order('voucher_number', { ascending: dateAscending })
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
query = query
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user