Fix/bank sync bas (#1284)
* fix(year-end): stop revaluing FX items that were not on the balance sheet The year-end close ran currency revaluation as an unconditional step before the irreversible close, and the revaluation queried LIVE open invoices with no date scoping. An invoice issued after balansdagen, settled before it, or never booked at all was therefore revalued into the year being closed, writing down a 1510/2440 that stood at zero. Because the entry lands inside the same run that closes the period, the only remedy left was a rattelse in the following year. The population is now measured as of balansdagen, reusing the reconstruction the reskontra reports already use (fetchPaymentsAsOf / outstandingAsOf): the invoice_date ceiling is unconditional (post-dated invoices make the bug reachable for a current period too) and the widening to 'paid' applies only to a historical date, where a since-settled invoice was still open then. Rows that carry no balance-sheet exposure are skipped per row rather than per company: an unbooked registration is not on 1510/2440. Deliberately NOT keyed on accounting_method, since BFL 5 kap 2 § 3 st requires kontantmetoden companies to book their outstanding fordringar/skulder at balansdagen, and those converted rows are genuine exposure that ARL 4 kap. 13 § must value. The readiness warning stays ungated on purpose: an unbooked FX row is exactly what deserves a warning, because /book still posts it into the year about to close and lockPeriod/closePeriod then removes that remedy for good. The wizard preview now lists the per-invoice revaluation rows it will post instead of three aggregate numbers, so the user approves line-level content before the close. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(bookkeeping): reach accounts outside BAS 2026 from a verifikat rattelse A user could not move a verifikat line to konto 8022: the picker reported no such account and offered no way forward. 8022 was dropped from BAS 2026 (it is in BAS 2018), so it is a legitimate company-specific underkonto rather than a catalog gap. Verified against the official bas.se kontoplan that our BAS reference already matches BAS 2026, so 8022 is deliberately NOT added to it: seeding a retired account would push it onto every company. StrikeLinesDialog and CorrectionEntryDialog were the only account pickers in the app that never passed onCreateAccount, so their combobox rendered a dead empty state. Both now open AddAccountDialog prefilled, then refetch the chart and select the new account on the initiating line, leaving the half-finished rattelse intact. AccountCombobox closed its dropdown on the fourth digit of any committed number, which hid the empty state before it was ever painted and made the create affordance unreachable for exactly the numbers that need it. It now closes only when the number matches something, so focus still advances to the belopp field for real accounts. No change to posting rules: correct_entry_lines_inline validates chart membership, not BAS membership, and account creation already required the same write role. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(vacation): adjust vacation accrual calculations for mid-year hires and update related logic --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mattsson
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
Claude Opus 5
parent
108f348c84
commit
3bbf2a051b
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
|
||||
import { splitCreateAccountPrefill } from '../create-account-prefill'
|
||||
|
||||
describe('splitCreateAccountPrefill', () => {
|
||||
it('routes a full account number to the number field', () => {
|
||||
// The support case: 8022 is a retired BAS account, so the picker finds
|
||||
// nothing and the user reaches for "Skapa konto" with the number typed.
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill('8022')).toEqual({ initialAccountNumber: '8022' })
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('routes a partial account number to the number field', () => {
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill('80')).toEqual({ initialAccountNumber: '80' })
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('routes a name fragment to the name field', () => {
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill('andelar i dotterföretag')).toEqual({
|
||||
initialAccountName: 'andelar i dotterföretag',
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('treats a number longer than four digits as a name, not a number', () => {
|
||||
// The dialog would silently truncate it to four digits; keeping it in the
|
||||
// name field makes the mistake visible instead.
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill('80221')).toEqual({ initialAccountName: '80221' })
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('treats a mixed string as a name', () => {
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill('8022 dotter')).toEqual({ initialAccountName: '8022 dotter' })
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('trims surrounding whitespace before deciding', () => {
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill(' 8022 ')).toEqual({ initialAccountNumber: '8022' })
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('returns neither prefill for an empty or blank string', () => {
|
||||
// Spreading {} leaves both props undefined, so the dialog opens blank
|
||||
// rather than with an empty-string name.
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill('')).toEqual({})
|
||||
expect(splitCreateAccountPrefill(' ')).toEqual({})
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
@@ -63,16 +63,33 @@ function mockRates(rates: Partial<Record<Currency, number>>) {
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Helper to build mock supabase
|
||||
function createMockSupabase(config: {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Extra tables the preview reads besides the two invoice ledgers:
|
||||
* company_settings decides the FX exposure scope (cash/deferred/accrual) and
|
||||
* the payment tables feed the as-of-balansdagen outstanding reconstruction.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
interface MockTablesConfig {
|
||||
invoices?: ReturnType<typeof makeInvoice>[]
|
||||
supplierInvoices?: ReturnType<typeof makeSupplierInvoice>[]
|
||||
settings?: Record<string, unknown>
|
||||
invoicePayments?: Record<string, unknown>[]
|
||||
supplierInvoicePayments?: Record<string, unknown>[]
|
||||
existingRevaluation?: boolean
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
const fromMap: Record<string, unknown[]> = {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function buildFromMap(config: MockTablesConfig): Record<string, unknown[]> {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
invoices: config.invoices || [],
|
||||
supplier_invoices: config.supplierInvoices || [],
|
||||
company_settings: config.settings ? [config.settings] : [],
|
||||
invoice_payments: config.invoicePayments || [],
|
||||
supplier_invoice_payments: config.supplierInvoicePayments || [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Helper to build mock supabase
|
||||
function createMockSupabase(config: MockTablesConfig) {
|
||||
const fromMap = buildFromMap(config)
|
||||
|
||||
const supabase = {
|
||||
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation((table: string) => {
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +160,20 @@ function buildFilterChain(data: unknown[]) {
|
||||
return chain
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// ISO date strings compare correctly as strings, matching PostgREST lte.
|
||||
chain.lte = vi.fn().mockImplementation((col: string, val: string) => {
|
||||
filtered = filtered.filter((row) => {
|
||||
const v = (row as Record<string, unknown>)[col]
|
||||
return v != null && String(v) <= val
|
||||
})
|
||||
return chain
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Terminal used by fetchFxExposureScope's company_settings read.
|
||||
chain.maybeSingle = vi.fn().mockImplementation(() =>
|
||||
Promise.resolve({ data: filtered[0] ?? null, error: null })
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// Paging stability order: no-op in the mock (data is already deterministic).
|
||||
chain.order = vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => chain)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -162,11 +193,7 @@ function buildFilterChain(data: unknown[]) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Better mock for supabase that supports journal_entries idempotency check
|
||||
function createFullMockSupabase(config: {
|
||||
invoices?: ReturnType<typeof makeInvoice>[]
|
||||
supplierInvoices?: ReturnType<typeof makeSupplierInvoice>[]
|
||||
existingRevaluation?: boolean
|
||||
}) {
|
||||
function createFullMockSupabase(config: MockTablesConfig) {
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const supabase: any = {
|
||||
from: vi.fn().mockImplementation((table: string) => {
|
||||
@@ -184,10 +211,7 @@ function createFullMockSupabase(config: {
|
||||
return journalChain
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const fromMap: Record<string, unknown[]> = {
|
||||
invoices: config.invoices || [],
|
||||
supplier_invoices: config.supplierInvoices || [],
|
||||
}
|
||||
const fromMap = buildFromMap(config)
|
||||
return buildFilterChain(fromMap[table] || [])
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1074,4 +1098,381 @@ describe('currency-revaluation', () => {
|
||||
expect(result!.preview.totalGain).toBe(1000) // 1000 * (12 - 11)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Regression: a year-end close revalued FX invoices that were NOT on the
|
||||
// balance sheet on balansdagen (issued later, settled earlier, or never
|
||||
// booked at all), writing down a 1510 that stood at zero. The population
|
||||
// must be measured AS OF the closing date, gated by the company's booking
|
||||
// mode, exactly like countOpenFxItemsAtBalansdagen in year-end-service.
|
||||
describe('as-of balansdagen population', () => {
|
||||
it('excludes an invoice issued after balansdagen', async () => {
|
||||
const laterInvoice = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2025-03-10',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({ invoices: [laterInvoice] })
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(0)
|
||||
expect(preview.lines).toHaveLength(0)
|
||||
expect(preview.unconvertedFxCount).toBe(0)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('includes an invoice settled after balansdagen at its as-of outstanding', async () => {
|
||||
// Paid in full in February 2025: on 2024-12-31 the whole amount was
|
||||
// still an open monetary item and must be valued (ÅRL 4 kap. 13 §).
|
||||
const settledLater = makeInvoice({
|
||||
id: 'inv-settled-later',
|
||||
status: 'paid',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
paid_amount: 1000,
|
||||
remaining_amount: 0,
|
||||
paid_at: '2025-02-01',
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-15',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
invoices: [settledLater],
|
||||
invoicePayments: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
company_id: 'company-1',
|
||||
invoice_id: 'inv-settled-later',
|
||||
amount: 1000,
|
||||
payment_date: '2025-02-01',
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.items[0].amount_in_currency).toBe(1000)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalGain).toBe(1000) // 1000 * (12 - 11)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('excludes the part of an invoice that was already paid on balansdagen', async () => {
|
||||
const partiallySettled = makeInvoice({
|
||||
id: 'inv-partial-asof',
|
||||
status: 'paid',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
paid_amount: 1000,
|
||||
remaining_amount: 0,
|
||||
paid_at: '2025-01-20',
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-15',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
invoices: [partiallySettled],
|
||||
invoicePayments: [
|
||||
// 600 paid before balansdagen, 400 after: only 400 was open.
|
||||
{
|
||||
company_id: 'company-1',
|
||||
invoice_id: 'inv-partial-asof',
|
||||
amount: 600,
|
||||
payment_date: '2024-12-10',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
company_id: 'company-1',
|
||||
invoice_id: 'inv-partial-asof',
|
||||
amount: 400,
|
||||
payment_date: '2025-01-20',
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.items[0].amount_in_currency).toBe(400)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalGain).toBe(400) // 400 * (12 - 11)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('excludes an unbooked row for a kontantmetoden company', async () => {
|
||||
// A registered-but-unbooked invoice is not on 1510, so revaluing it
|
||||
// fabricated a write-down of an account that stood at zero.
|
||||
const eurInvoice = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-15',
|
||||
journal_entry_id: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
invoices: [eurInvoice],
|
||||
settings: { company_id: 'company-1', accounting_method: 'cash' },
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(0)
|
||||
expect(preview.lines).toHaveLength(0)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('still revalues a kontantmetoden company row booked at balansdagen', async () => {
|
||||
// BFL 5 kap 2 § 3 st: kontantmetoden companies must book their
|
||||
// outstanding fordringar/skulder at year-end. Those converted rows ARE
|
||||
// on 1510 and must be valued at balansdagskurs (ÅRL 4 kap. 13 §), so
|
||||
// gating on accounting_method rather than on the row would drop them.
|
||||
const bookedEur = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-15',
|
||||
journal_entry_id: 'je-yearend-conversion',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
invoices: [bookedEur],
|
||||
settings: { company_id: 'company-1', accounting_method: 'cash' },
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalGain).toBe(1000) // 1000 * (12 - 11)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('excludes a post-dated invoice even when balansdagen is not historical', async () => {
|
||||
// The date ceiling is unconditional: an invoice issued after the
|
||||
// balансdagen is not on the balance sheet being valued, whether or not
|
||||
// that date happens to be in the past.
|
||||
const future = new Date(Date.now() + 90 * 86400000).toISOString().slice(0, 10)
|
||||
const postDated = new Date(Date.now() + 30 * 86400000).toISOString().slice(0, 10)
|
||||
const beforeToday = new Date(Date.now() - 30 * 86400000).toISOString().slice(0, 10)
|
||||
|
||||
const openNow = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: beforeToday,
|
||||
})
|
||||
const laterInvoice = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 500,
|
||||
invoice_date: future,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({ invoices: [openNow, laterInvoice] })
|
||||
// Balansdagen between the two invoice dates, still in the future.
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', postDated)
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.items[0].amount_in_currency).toBe(1000)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('values a still-open invoice at what it owed on balansdagen', async () => {
|
||||
// The common straddling case: the row is 'partially_paid' today, so the
|
||||
// OLD status list already fetched it, but its live paid_amount reflects
|
||||
// payments made after balansdagen.
|
||||
const straddling = makeInvoice({
|
||||
id: 'inv-straddle',
|
||||
status: 'partially_paid',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
paid_amount: 900,
|
||||
remaining_amount: 100,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-10-01',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
invoices: [straddling],
|
||||
invoicePayments: [
|
||||
{ company_id: 'company-1', invoice_id: 'inv-straddle', amount: 300, payment_date: '2024-11-05' },
|
||||
{ company_id: 'company-1', invoice_id: 'inv-straddle', amount: 600, payment_date: '2025-02-11' },
|
||||
],
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
// 700 was open on balansdagen, not the live 100.
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.items[0].amount_in_currency).toBe(700)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalGain).toBe(700)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('applies the same as-of reconstruction to payables', async () => {
|
||||
const straddlingPayable = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
id: 'si-straddle',
|
||||
status: 'partially_paid',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 2000,
|
||||
remaining_amount: 200,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-10-01',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
supplierInvoices: [straddlingPayable],
|
||||
supplierInvoicePayments: [
|
||||
{ company_id: 'company-1', supplier_invoice_id: 'si-straddle', amount: 500, payment_date: '2024-12-01' },
|
||||
{ company_id: 'company-1', supplier_invoice_id: 'si-straddle', amount: 1300, payment_date: '2025-03-04' },
|
||||
],
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
// 1500 was owed on balansdagen; a rising rate is a LOSS on a payable.
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.items[0].amount_in_currency).toBe(1500)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalLoss).toBe(1500)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalGain).toBe(0)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('excludes an unbooked payable under deferred booking', async () => {
|
||||
const bookedSi = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'registered',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
remaining_amount: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-01',
|
||||
registration_journal_entry_id: 'je-si-1',
|
||||
})
|
||||
const unbookedSi = makeSupplierInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'registered',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 400,
|
||||
remaining_amount: 400,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-02',
|
||||
registration_journal_entry_id: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
supplierInvoices: [bookedSi, unbookedSi],
|
||||
settings: {
|
||||
company_id: 'company-1',
|
||||
accounting_method: 'accrual',
|
||||
defer_invoice_booking: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.items[0].amount_in_currency).toBe(1000)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalLoss).toBe(1000)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('renders a preview instead of throwing when settings cannot be read', async () => {
|
||||
// previewCurrencyRevaluation is the read-only surface: the year-end
|
||||
// preview must still render (same contract as the missing-rate path).
|
||||
const eurInvoice = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-15',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({ invoices: [eurInvoice] })
|
||||
const original = supabase.from
|
||||
supabase.from = vi.fn().mockImplementation((table: string) => {
|
||||
if (table === 'company_settings') {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
select: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
|
||||
eq: vi.fn().mockReturnValue({
|
||||
maybeSingle: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({
|
||||
data: null,
|
||||
error: { message: 'connection reset' },
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return original(table)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalGain).toBe(1000)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('under deferred booking only revalues rows whose registration is booked', async () => {
|
||||
const bookedInvoice = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-15',
|
||||
journal_entry_id: 'je-1',
|
||||
})
|
||||
const unbookedInvoice = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 500,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2024-11-20',
|
||||
journal_entry_id: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createMockSupabase({
|
||||
invoices: [bookedInvoice, unbookedInvoice],
|
||||
settings: {
|
||||
company_id: 'company-1',
|
||||
accounting_method: 'accrual',
|
||||
defer_invoice_booking: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any
|
||||
const preview = await previewCurrencyRevaluation(supabase as any, 'company-1', '2024-12-31')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(preview.items).toHaveLength(1)
|
||||
expect(preview.items[0].amount_in_currency).toBe(1000)
|
||||
expect(preview.totalGain).toBe(1000) // only the booked 1000 EUR row
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('executeCurrencyRevaluation posts nothing when nothing was open on balansdagen', async () => {
|
||||
// The Oppy case end to end: only a post-balansdagen invoice exists, so
|
||||
// the year-end run must not create any verifikat at all.
|
||||
const laterInvoice = makeInvoice({
|
||||
status: 'sent',
|
||||
currency: 'EUR',
|
||||
exchange_rate: 11.0,
|
||||
total: 1000,
|
||||
invoice_date: '2025-03-10',
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
mockRates({ EUR: 12.0 })
|
||||
const supabase = createFullMockSupabase({
|
||||
invoices: [laterInvoice],
|
||||
existingRevaluation: false,
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
const result = await executeCurrencyRevaluation(supabase, 'company-1', '2024-12-31', 'period-1')
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result).toBeNull()
|
||||
expect(mockedCreateEntry).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user