fix(sandbox): complete the teardown for the four FK and guard blockers added since August (#2112)
cleanup_sandbox_user deletes supplier_invoices and journal_entries without first clearing four blockers added or missed since it was last fixed: supplier_payment_batch_items (RESTRICT FK, that table was created 2026-08-10), fiscal_periods.opening_balance_entry_id (NO ACTION FK whose NULLing is itself blocked by enforce_opening_balance_immutability), terminal webhook_deliveries rows, and payment_match_log rows whose company_id IS NULL, which fail the shared audit bypass because it requires a non-null company. Prod: 9 stale sandbox users, oldest 2026-07-22, retried nightly and failing forever, so anonymous demo tenants accumulate indefinitely. The bypass stays scoped to sandbox teardown. The audit-log immutability and the webhook terminal-delete guard are not weakened for normal tenants, and the pg test asserts they still bite for a non-sandbox tenant. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016ifKg6Ec67A39oxfGPU1yc Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Opus 5
parent
088754d61a
commit
2c46d69d21
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
|
||||
import { randomUUID } from 'node:crypto'
|
||||
import type { PoolClient } from 'pg'
|
||||
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
|
||||
import { getClient, getPool } from './setup'
|
||||
import { insertPostedJournalEntry, seedCompany } from './fixtures'
|
||||
import { insertPostedJournalEntry, insertTransaction, seedCompany } from './fixtures'
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Sandbox cleanup RPCs (migration 20260807130000):
|
||||
@@ -14,12 +15,26 @@ import { insertPostedJournalEntry, seedCompany } from './fixtures'
|
||||
* deletes, non-sandbox users stay refused, immutability outside the RPC is
|
||||
* untouched, and the expired sweep also removes orphaned anonymous users
|
||||
* that never got a company_settings row.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Extended by 20260901120000 with the four blockers that stalled nine
|
||||
* sandboxes on prod (oldest 2026-07-22): a betalfil batch holding a supplier
|
||||
* invoice through ON DELETE RESTRICT, a fiscal period pointing at its IB and
|
||||
* bokslut vouchers through NO ACTION FKs, a terminal webhook delivery, and a
|
||||
* payment_match_log row with company_id NULL. The seed now carries all four,
|
||||
* and each relaxed guard gets a paired test proving it still refuses a
|
||||
* NON-sandbox tenant even when the teardown flag is set: that, not the happy
|
||||
* path, is the regression that matters.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
async function seedSandboxUser(settingsCreatedAt?: string): Promise<{
|
||||
userId: string
|
||||
companyId: string
|
||||
fiscalPeriodId: string
|
||||
entryId: string
|
||||
batchId: string
|
||||
supplierInvoiceId: string
|
||||
deliveryId: string
|
||||
matchLogId: string
|
||||
}> {
|
||||
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedCompany()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
@@ -96,7 +111,115 @@ async function seedSandboxUser(settingsCreatedAt?: string): Promise<{
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, '{}', '{"1":"BUTIK"}', 'Sandbox cleanup test retag')`,
|
||||
[companyId, entryId, lineRows[0]!.id],
|
||||
)
|
||||
return { userId, companyId, entryId }
|
||||
// A betalfil batch: supplier_payment_batch_items references the supplier
|
||||
// invoice with a composite ON DELETE RESTRICT FK, so the batch header must
|
||||
// be purged before the supplier_invoices delete (20260901120000).
|
||||
const supplierId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.suppliers (id, user_id, company_id, name, bankgiro)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'Derome Bygg AB', '5050-1055')`,
|
||||
[supplierId, userId, companyId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
const supplierInvoiceId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_invoices
|
||||
(id, user_id, company_id, supplier_id, arrival_number,
|
||||
supplier_invoice_number, invoice_date, due_date,
|
||||
subtotal, vat_amount, total, remaining_amount, status)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, floor(random() * 1000000)::int,
|
||||
$5, '2026-06-23', '2026-07-07',
|
||||
590, 147.5, 737.5, 737.5, 'approved')`,
|
||||
[supplierInvoiceId, userId, companyId, supplierId, `CD-${supplierInvoiceId.slice(0, 8)}`],
|
||||
)
|
||||
const batchId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_payment_batches
|
||||
(id, company_id, user_id, format, total_amount, item_count, msg_id, debtor_snapshot)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'pain001', 737.5, 1, $4,
|
||||
'{"name":"Sandbox AB","org_number":"556677-8899","iban":"SE3550000000054910000003","bic":"ESSESESS"}')`,
|
||||
[batchId, companyId, userId, `ACCOUNTED-5566778899-B${batchId.slice(0, 8)}`],
|
||||
)
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.supplier_payment_batch_items
|
||||
(batch_id, company_id, supplier_invoice_id, amount, payment_date,
|
||||
payee_type, payee_bankgiro, payee_name, reference_type, reference)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 737.5, '2026-08-15',
|
||||
'bankgiro', '50501055', 'Derome Bygg AB', 'invoice_number', 'CD3014794407')`,
|
||||
[batchId, companyId, supplierInvoiceId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
// A period that has both an IB link (write-once once opening_balances_set)
|
||||
// and a bokslut link: fiscal_periods_opening_balance_entry_id_fkey and
|
||||
// fiscal_periods_closing_entry_id_fkey are both NO ACTION, so the journal
|
||||
// delete fails until the teardown clears them, and clearing them is itself
|
||||
// blocked by enforce_opening_balance_immutability outside the bypass.
|
||||
const closingEntryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
|
||||
userId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
fiscalPeriodId,
|
||||
voucherNumber: 1,
|
||||
sourceType: 'year_end',
|
||||
description: 'Sandbox bokslut',
|
||||
})
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods
|
||||
SET opening_balance_entry_id = $2, opening_balances_set = true, closing_entry_id = $3
|
||||
WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[fiscalPeriodId, entryId, closingEntryId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
// A delivered webhook delivery: block_webhook_delivery_terminal_delete
|
||||
// raises on the auth.users -> companies cascade outside the bypass.
|
||||
const webhookId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.webhooks (id, company_id, event_type, webhook_url, secret)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, 'journal_entry.committed', 'https://example.invalid/hook', $3)`,
|
||||
[webhookId, companyId, randomUUID()],
|
||||
)
|
||||
const deliveryId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.webhook_deliveries
|
||||
(id, webhook_id, company_id, event_type, payload, api_version, status, delivered_at)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'journal_entry.committed', '{"id":"demo"}', '2026-05-12',
|
||||
'delivered', now())`,
|
||||
[deliveryId, webhookId, companyId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
// A match-log row WITHOUT company_id: the shape lib/invoices/match-log.ts
|
||||
// has always written, and the one the shared audit_log_immutable() bypass
|
||||
// could not recognise as a sandbox row. It points at the supplier invoice
|
||||
// above on purpose: payment_match_log_supplier_invoice_id_fkey is ON DELETE
|
||||
// SET NULL, so a teardown that purges the match log after the supplier
|
||||
// invoices turns this row into an UPDATE, which the guard refuses even
|
||||
// during teardown. The order of the two deletes is what this row pins.
|
||||
const transactionId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.transactions
|
||||
(id, company_id, user_id, currency, amount, date, description, category)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'SEK', -737.5, '2026-06-24', 'Sandbox betalning', 'uncategorized')`,
|
||||
[transactionId, companyId, userId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
const { rows: matchRows } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.payment_match_log
|
||||
(user_id, transaction_id, supplier_invoice_id, action)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'matched') RETURNING id`,
|
||||
[userId, transactionId, supplierInvoiceId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
return {
|
||||
userId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
fiscalPeriodId,
|
||||
entryId,
|
||||
batchId,
|
||||
supplierInvoiceId,
|
||||
deliveryId,
|
||||
matchLogId: matchRows[0]!.id,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function countById(table: string, id: string): Promise<number> {
|
||||
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
|
||||
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM ${table} WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[id],
|
||||
)
|
||||
return rows[0]!.n
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function insertAnonymousAuthUser(createdAt: string): Promise<string> {
|
||||
@@ -151,6 +274,31 @@ describe('sandbox cleanup RPCs (pg)', () => {
|
||||
expect(lines[0]!.n).toBe(0)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('clears the batch, IB/bokslut, webhook and match-log blockers and leaves no tenant rows', async () => {
|
||||
const seed = await seedSandboxUser()
|
||||
|
||||
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [seed.userId])
|
||||
|
||||
expect(await authUserExists(seed.userId)).toBe(false)
|
||||
// Each of these is one of the four blockers: before 20260901120000 the
|
||||
// RPC raised on the first of them and the whole teardown rolled back.
|
||||
expect(await countById('public.supplier_payment_batches', seed.batchId)).toBe(0)
|
||||
expect(await countById('public.supplier_invoices', seed.supplierInvoiceId)).toBe(0)
|
||||
expect(await countById('public.fiscal_periods', seed.fiscalPeriodId)).toBe(0)
|
||||
expect(await countById('public.webhook_deliveries', seed.deliveryId)).toBe(0)
|
||||
expect(await countById('public.payment_match_log', seed.matchLogId)).toBe(0)
|
||||
const { rows: items } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
|
||||
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM public.supplier_payment_batch_items WHERE batch_id = $1`,
|
||||
[seed.batchId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
expect(items[0]!.n).toBe(0)
|
||||
const { rows: leftovers } = await getPool().query<{ n: number }>(
|
||||
`SELECT count(*)::int AS n FROM public.company_settings WHERE company_id = $1`,
|
||||
[seed.companyId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
expect(leftovers[0]!.n).toBe(0)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('refuses a user with no company_settings rows at all', async () => {
|
||||
const { userId } = await seedCompany()
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
@@ -442,3 +590,174 @@ describe('sandbox cleanup RPCs (pg)', () => {
|
||||
expect(rows[0]!.authed_expired).toBe(false)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The regression half of 20260901120000: three guards were relaxed for
|
||||
* sandbox teardown, and each one still has to refuse a real tenant. Every
|
||||
* case runs twice, once plain and once with gnubok.sandbox_cleanup set by
|
||||
* hand, because a flag-only bypass would pass the first and fail the second.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
describe('sandbox teardown bypasses never reach a real tenant (pg)', () => {
|
||||
async function withTeardownFlag<T>(fn: (client: PoolClient) => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
|
||||
const client = await getClient()
|
||||
try {
|
||||
await client.query('BEGIN')
|
||||
await client.query(`SELECT set_config('gnubok.sandbox_cleanup', 'true', true)`)
|
||||
return await fn(client)
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
await client.query('ROLLBACK').catch(() => {})
|
||||
client.release()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async function seedRealCompany(): Promise<{
|
||||
userId: string
|
||||
companyId: string
|
||||
fiscalPeriodId: string
|
||||
}> {
|
||||
const ctx = await seedCompany()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.company_settings (user_id, company_id, is_sandbox)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, false)`,
|
||||
[ctx.userId, ctx.companyId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
return ctx
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
it('enforce_opening_balance_immutability still refuses to unlink a real IB voucher', async () => {
|
||||
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedRealCompany()
|
||||
const entryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({ userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId })
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods
|
||||
SET opening_balance_entry_id = $2, opening_balances_set = true
|
||||
WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[fiscalPeriodId, entryId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
getPool().query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET opening_balance_entry_id = NULL WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[fiscalPeriodId],
|
||||
),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/opening balances are immutable once set/i)
|
||||
|
||||
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
client.query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET opening_balance_entry_id = NULL WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[fiscalPeriodId],
|
||||
),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/opening balances are immutable once set/i)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('enforce_opening_balance_immutability still refuses to detach a real bokslut voucher', async () => {
|
||||
const { userId, companyId, fiscalPeriodId } = await seedRealCompany()
|
||||
const closingEntryId = await insertPostedJournalEntry({
|
||||
userId,
|
||||
companyId,
|
||||
fiscalPeriodId,
|
||||
sourceType: 'year_end',
|
||||
description: 'Bokslut 2026',
|
||||
})
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET closing_entry_id = $2 WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[fiscalPeriodId, closingEntryId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
client.query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.fiscal_periods SET closing_entry_id = NULL WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[fiscalPeriodId],
|
||||
),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/year-end closing is immutable/i)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('block_webhook_delivery_terminal_delete still refuses a real tenant terminal delivery', async () => {
|
||||
const { companyId } = await seedRealCompany()
|
||||
const deliveryId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.webhook_deliveries
|
||||
(id, company_id, event_type, payload, api_version, status, delivered_at)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, 'journal_entry.committed', '{"id":"real"}', '2026-05-12',
|
||||
'delivered', now())`,
|
||||
[deliveryId, companyId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
getPool().query(`DELETE FROM public.webhook_deliveries WHERE id = $1`, [deliveryId]),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/terminal status/i)
|
||||
|
||||
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
client.query(`DELETE FROM public.webhook_deliveries WHERE id = $1`, [deliveryId]),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/terminal status/i)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
// Non-terminal rows stay deletable, flag or no flag: the guard's
|
||||
// predicate is unchanged for everyone outside a sandbox.
|
||||
const pendingId = randomUUID()
|
||||
await getPool().query(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.webhook_deliveries
|
||||
(id, company_id, event_type, payload, api_version, status)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, 'journal_entry.committed', '{"id":"real"}', '2026-05-12', 'pending')`,
|
||||
[pendingId, companyId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
await getPool().query(`DELETE FROM public.webhook_deliveries WHERE id = $1`, [pendingId])
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('payment_match_log stays append-only for a real tenant, company_id set or NULL', async () => {
|
||||
const { userId, companyId } = await seedRealCompany()
|
||||
const transactionId = await insertTransaction({ companyId, userId })
|
||||
const { rows } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.payment_match_log (user_id, company_id, transaction_id, action)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'matched') RETURNING id`,
|
||||
[userId, companyId, transactionId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
const tenantedId = rows[0]!.id
|
||||
const { rows: untenanted } = await getPool().query<{ id: string }>(
|
||||
`INSERT INTO public.payment_match_log (user_id, transaction_id, action)
|
||||
VALUES ($1, $2, 'unmatched') RETURNING id`,
|
||||
[userId, transactionId],
|
||||
)
|
||||
const untenantedId = untenanted[0]!.id
|
||||
|
||||
for (const id of [tenantedId, untenantedId]) {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
getPool().query(`DELETE FROM public.payment_match_log WHERE id = $1`, [id]),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
|
||||
// The company_id IS NULL branch is the one 20260901120000 added; it
|
||||
// must resolve through company_settings.user_id, not through the flag.
|
||||
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
client.query(`DELETE FROM public.payment_match_log WHERE id = $1`, [id]),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
getPool().query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.payment_match_log SET action = 'unmatched' WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[tenantedId],
|
||||
),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
it('payment_match_log UPDATE stays forbidden even inside a sandbox teardown', async () => {
|
||||
const seed = await seedSandboxUser()
|
||||
|
||||
await withTeardownFlag(async (client) => {
|
||||
await expect(
|
||||
client.query(
|
||||
`UPDATE public.payment_match_log SET action = 'unmatched' WHERE id = $1`,
|
||||
[seed.matchLogId],
|
||||
),
|
||||
).rejects.toThrow(/cannot be modified or deleted/i)
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
await getPool().query(`SELECT public.cleanup_sandbox_user($1)`, [seed.userId])
|
||||
expect(await authUserExists(seed.userId)).toBe(false)
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user