fix(supplier-invoices): duplicate-payment guard matches abbreviated bank text and shares one detector with the customer side (#2299) (#2345)
* fix(supplier-invoices): duplicate-payment guard matches abbreviated bank text and shares one detector with the customer side The mark-paid guard probed merchant_name for the FULL supplier name, so the row that paid Hi3G Access AB (bank text "HI3G", merchant_name empty) never matched and the payment was booked twice (#2299). - counterpartyNeedle(): first distinctive token of the name (alnum, legal forms dropped, >= 2 chars so initialisms like SJ and 3M survive), probed on merchant_name OR description in one .or() per currency sweep; the alnum shape is what makes the DSL interpolation safe. - findDuplicatePaymentCandidatesForSupplierInvoice() beside the customer detector; both share the sweep and the scorer. The dashboard route's inline copy is deleted; the v1 supplier mark-paid door gets the guard it lacked. - New match_reason already_booked (row already carries a verifikat, booked straight from the bank side): ranked first, carries journal_entry_id, and the dialogs, MCP path and pending-operation commit word the remedy as a rattelse rather than "link it". - Customer side gets the same token prefilter and classification. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019SaJfqNi4VmsG8FMKq99G6 * test(invoices): align customer mark-paid queued mocks with the one-probe duplicate guard The customer detector now issues one .or() counterparty probe per currency sweep instead of two ILIKE queries, so every queued answer after the guard was consumed one step early: the aggregate-sweep [] became company_settings, the settings row hit the entry builder, and two tests saw 500 / the wrong voucher id. Each guard block now enqueues one probe plus the aggregate sweep; the 409 tests drop the second-probe entry that is no longer read. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019SaJfqNi4VmsG8FMKq99G6 * fix(invoices): one logic expression per duplicate-payment sweep, never two or= params The sweep chain carried two .or() calls (currency clause, then name probe). postgrest-js appends a query parameter per call, so the client sent or= twice, and whether PostgREST ANDs a repeated key was never proven in this repo; had it kept one, the currency predicate would be gone and foreign rows banded against a kronor figure. counterpartySweepLogic() now nests both groups under one and() inside a single top-level or(): and(or(<currency>),or(merchant_name.ilike.*x*, description.ilike.*x*)). The sweep issues exactly one .or() per currency. Proof at three levels: unit tests pin the helper's string; a fake-fetch test runs the real postgrest-js builder and asserts exactly one or= search param per request; a tool-pg test seeds right-currency+hit, wrong-currency+hit (with an amount_sek that would pass every JS check) and right-currency+miss rows against a real PostgREST and asserts, for both detectors and both sweeps, that only the first comes back, from PostgREST's own response. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019SaJfqNi4VmsG8FMKq99G6 * fix(invoices): name storno as the already_booked remedy, never "makulera" A posted verifikat is never deleted; it is corrected by a storno entry (BFL 5 kap 5 §). The already_booked remedy text in the error catalogue, the MCP and pending-operation messages and both UI descriptions now say so: "vänd en av verifikationerna med storno och koppla underlaget till den som blir kvar" / "reverse one of the two vouchers with a storno entry and attach the underlag to the remaining one". Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Jakob Wennberg <311770904+jakobwennberg-oss@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
co-authored by
Claude Fable 5.1
Jakob Wennberg
parent
82d25b7dee
commit
272d19b287
@@ -161,9 +161,8 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
// Fetch invoice
|
||||
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: merchant_name ILIKE, no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: description ILIKE, no candidates
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: ONE counterparty probe (merchant_name OR
|
||||
// description in a single .or(), issue #2299), no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: aggregate sweep (larger unbooked kronor rows), none
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
@@ -234,8 +233,7 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
// Fetch invoice
|
||||
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: two ILIKE probes, no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: one counterparty probe, no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: aggregate sweep (larger unbooked kronor rows), none
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
@@ -266,9 +264,8 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: merchant_name ILIKE, no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: description ILIKE, no candidates
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: ONE counterparty probe (merchant_name OR
|
||||
// description in a single .or(), issue #2299), no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: aggregate sweep (larger unbooked kronor rows), none
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
@@ -426,7 +423,7 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: merchant_name ILIKE returns the match
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: the single counterparty probe returns the match
|
||||
enqueue({
|
||||
data: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -440,8 +437,6 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
],
|
||||
error: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
// description ILIKE, no additional match (dedup keeps merchant_name result)
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
|
||||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/invoices/inv-1/mark-paid', { method: 'POST' })
|
||||
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'inv-1' }))
|
||||
@@ -803,8 +798,6 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
],
|
||||
error: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
// description ILIKE, no additional match
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
|
||||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/invoices/inv-1/mark-paid', { method: 'POST' })
|
||||
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'inv-1' }))
|
||||
@@ -851,8 +844,6 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
],
|
||||
error: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
// description ILIKE, no additional matches
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
|
||||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/invoices/inv-1/mark-paid', { method: 'POST' })
|
||||
const response = await POST(request, createMockRouteParams({ id: 'inv-1' }))
|
||||
@@ -877,9 +868,8 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: merchant_name ILIKE, no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: description ILIKE, no candidates
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: ONE counterparty probe (merchant_name OR
|
||||
// description in a single .or(), issue #2299), no candidates
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
// Duplicate-payment guard: aggregate sweep (larger unbooked kronor rows), none
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
@@ -994,8 +984,9 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
||||
// merchant_name ILIKE probe: the bank row is in kronor, because the
|
||||
// candidate lookup scans transactions.amount, which is SEK.
|
||||
// EUR currency sweep (one counterparty probe per currency, issue #2299):
|
||||
// the queued stub ignores filters, so the kronor row lands here and is
|
||||
// kept by the per-row re-check as a SEK magnitude of the EUR payment.
|
||||
enqueue({
|
||||
data: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -1009,7 +1000,7 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
],
|
||||
error: null,
|
||||
})
|
||||
// description ILIKE probe: no additional match.
|
||||
// SEK currency sweep: no additional match.
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null })
|
||||
|
||||
const request = createMockRequest('/api/invoices/inv-1/mark-paid', {
|
||||
@@ -1159,8 +1150,7 @@ describe('POST /api/invoices/[id]/mark-paid', () => {
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue({ data: invoice, error: null })
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // duplicate guard: merchant_name
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // duplicate guard: description
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // duplicate guard: one counterparty probe
|
||||
enqueue({ data: [], error: null }) // duplicate guard: aggregate sweep
|
||||
enqueue({ data: { accounting_method: 'cash', entity_type: 'enskild_firma' }, error: null })
|
||||
enqueue({ data: { id: 'ip-1' }, error: null }) // invoice_payments insert
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user