Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Claude Opus 5 853f09320c docs: probed 0pt.app — Vercel answers with HTTP 402 DEPLOYMENT_DISABLED
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 31s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 47s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 1m6s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 29s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 26s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 41s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 56s
The previous commit said "nobody has probed the running site". I then probed it,
so the docs should not keep hedging.

  curl -sI https://0pt.app/
    HTTP/2 402
    server: Vercel
    x-vercel-error: DEPLOYMENT_DISABLED
    strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000
  https://0pt.app/api/health -> HTTP 402, body "Payment required / DEPLOYMENT_DISABLED"

Two facts hold simultaneously and the docs now state both: the Coolify deploy hook
fires for real on every push to main, AND the public product domain is dark behind a
disabled Vercel deployment with DNS never cut over. Neither cancels the other.

Still not established, and still marked as such: whether the Coolify app builds and
starts. A deploy endpoint returning 200 means the request was accepted, not that a
container came up healthy.

Side note worth recording for PR #19: the HSTS header on that 402 response is
Vercel's platform default, which is exactly the disappearing-on-cutover risk
next.config.mjs in PR #19 was written to remove.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 10:01:17 +02:00
Claude Opus 5 d7a1c4d5e1 docs: the Coolify deploy hook is LIVE — six docs still say it is a placeholder
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 31s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 42s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 44s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 30s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 37s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 26s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 1m2s
Six documents on main assert that no Coolify app has been provisioned for 0pt and
that cd.yml's COOLIFY_APP_ID is a literal placeholder whose guard fails the job on
purpose. That is no longer true, and the gap is not cosmetic: it means a merge to
main silently ships to production while the repo's own docs promise it cannot.

Measured, not assumed:

  * repo Actions secret  COOLIFY_TOKEN   exists, created 2026-08-31T11:34:34Z
    (GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/secrets)
  * repo Actions variable COOLIFY_APP_ID exists with a real 24-character value,
    not the "TODO-no-coolify-app-provisioned-yet" literal
    (GET /api/v1/repos/sax3l/0pt/actions/variables)
  * both guards in .gitea/workflows/cd.yml therefore pass; on the push to main at
    1ff34410 (2026-09-06) the job "Deploy to Coolify / deploy" (run 11695, job
    26295) finished SUCCESS with "coolify deploy HTTP 200" in its log

Deliberately NOT claimed: that the Coolify app builds, starts or serves, or that
0pt.app DNS points at it rather than Vercel. Nobody probed the running site, and
every corrected passage says so explicitly rather than replacing one unverified
claim with another.

Corrected: README.md "Deploy", docs/02-architecture.md hosting callout,
docs/architecture/decisions/0001 (consequence annotated, decision untouched --
an ADR is a historical record), docs/runbook/incident.md (the symptom row is now
inverted: the risk is an unintended deploy, not a red job),
docs/compliance/GOLDEN-STANDARD-REPORT.md D4 (❌ -> ⚠️, not ✅, because "webhook
accepted" is not "app serves"), docs/compliance/INVENTORY.md CI row.

Falsifiable check over all six files (stale claim present without a correction
marker = red):

  origin/main                                  -> FAIL (12 findings)
  this branch                                  -> PASS
  mutation: drop only the README bullet        -> FAIL
  mutation: drop only the runbook correction   -> FAIL

The check initially passed vacuously on docs/02-architecture.md because PR #32 had
already put the string "CORRECTED 2026-09-06" in that file for an unrelated reason;
the marker was made specific so the check could actually fail there too.

Docs only. No workflow files, no .gitignore, no source.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 09:56:53 +02:00
Claude Opus 5 4bc79c25d3 docs: withdraw the "Superset / OpenMetadata are OUT" rows — both are canonical
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Successful in 36s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 1m3s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 23s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 31s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Successful in 32s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 29s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 27s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 55s
`docs/02-architecture.md` was written when 0pt was planned as a standalone SaaS
product. Its "Stack decisions — OUT (do not add)" table rejects Apache Superset
("Metabase already covers BI") and DataHub/OpenMetadata ("enterprise-heavy"),
and the "IN" table names Metabase as the BI choice.

Under the SIAX Cloud analytics decision, 0pt is the canonical
Analytics/Data/Semantic owner — there is no BI0/Analytics0 repo and no separate
Superset platform. Superset is the canonical BI engine (Apache-2.0, official
embed SDK + guest tokens) and OpenMetadata the canonical catalog, default ahead
of DataHub. Metabase, DataHub, Lightdash, Rill and Grafana are optional App
Catalog apps, never the platform default.

This repository had already shipped both of the "rejected" tools, which is what
makes the old rows self-contradicting rather than merely stale:

  * src/metadata/openmetadata-adapter.ts + tests/contracts/metadata-features.contract.test.ts
    (STATUS.md classifies the OpenMetadata projection IMPLEMENTED)
  * services/infra/docker-compose.data-stack.yml defines a `superset` service
    (apache/superset:latest), and docs/compliance/OSS-INVENTORY.md line 74
    already inventories `superset | Apache-2.0 | services/infra/data-stack`

Falsifiable check used (asserts the OUT table no longer rejects either tool and
that the IN table's BI row names Superset):

  origin/main            -> FAIL (4 findings)
  this branch            -> PASS
  mutation: BI row back to Metabase        -> FAIL
  mutation: OUT rows un-struck             -> FAIL

Docs only. No workflow files, no .gitignore, no source. `node scripts/siax-doctor.mjs`
gives 39/40 on this branch and 39/40 on main — the one failure (P1-15 CODEOWNERS
missing) is pre-existing and is what PR #19 supplies.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-06 09:46:35 +02:00
Simon AxelssonandClaude Fable 5 c47e3b468e test(integration)+ci+docs: live OpenSearch/ClickHouse suites, CI service containers, STATUS.md (§56)
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (push) Failing after 22s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 22s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 21s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 43s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / integration (pull_request) Failing after 3s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 16s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 43s
- tests/integration/: 10 tests against REAL OpenSearch 2.11 (tenant
  isolation, purpose/rights filters, generation rebuild/rollback,
  projection-disaster rebuild §68) + REAL ClickHouse 24.8 (tenant-isolated
  metric DSL, TTL schema, injection-surface refusals). Honest skip without
  env - and CI fails hard if the suites skip instead of running.
- .gitea/workflows/ci.yml: new blocking 'integration' job with
  self-identifying service containers (st0re ci.yml's measured
  alias-collision discipline: run-unique cluster.name / credentials,
  getent-enumerated IP selection, no-match = hard fail).
- STATUS.md: full 8-level Master-DoD classification per capability incl.
  the honest gaps blocking PRODUCTION_READY.
- dependency-mode: NEXT_PHASE=phase-production-build is not a serving
  runtime (next build page-data collection must compile; guard re-arms at
  boot) - pinned by contract test.
- docs/02-architecture.md: superseded the accurate-but-now-fixed 'every
  client runs against its mock' paragraph; .env.example: client URLs now
  actually read from env + new P0 backend vars.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 16:56:33 +02:00
admin 328f8a46cb docs+chore: repo hygiene -- v2.0 manifests, ADRs, changelog, doctor, guides
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (push) Successful in 19s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (push) Successful in 44s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 21s
Security Scan (SIAX Cloud) / security (pull_request) Successful in 20s
CI (SIAX Cloud) / quality (pull_request) Successful in 42s
BACKLOG P1-1: siax.repo.json/siax.config.json rewritten to be schema-valid
against sax3l/siax-standard's actual v2.0 schemas (lifecycle,
operationalState, gitHost, domains-as-objects, consumedBy, children,
contracts -- validated with jsonschema, not just eyeballed). config.json
restructured to the real deploy-descriptor shape (framework/build/start/
port/healthcheck/environments) instead of duplicating repo.json's identity
fields, which the schema doesn't allow.

BACKLOG P1-2: 3 ADRs for decisions already made and evidenced elsewhere in
this repo (Coolify-not-Vercel, Zitadel-not-NextAuth, Iceberg-format pointer
to n0d ADR-0030) -- retroactive documentation, not new decisions. The
Stripe/Revolut and services/scrapers/* questions are explicitly NOT written
as ADRs here; both are account-owner-gated or actively under review
elsewhere (see docs/architecture/decisions/README.md).

BACKLOG P1-3: CHANGELOG.md from real git log history (no tags/releases
exist yet -- this doesn't invent version numbers that were never cut).

BACKLOG P1-19: `pnpm siax:doctor` (scripts/siax-doctor.mjs, AGENT-04) --
zero-dependency, checks required files + manifest shape, prints
control-IDs. .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (DX-03). compose.dev.yaml
(DX-02 -- UNVERIFIED, no Docker available in this environment to smoke-test,
flagged in the file itself). All 4 prompts + the index rewritten to AGENT-03
shape (goal/context/prerequisites/scope/contract/acceptance-criteria/
control-ID/forbidden-actions).

BACKLOG P1-20: docs/architecture/ARCHITECTURE.md migrated to the v2.0
9-heading template -- new §5 "Ytor och paritet" (capability x
API/CLI/MCP/console coverage table, grounded in the same registry facts
docs/02-architecture.md already established), §6-9 renumbered from the old
§5-8 (all internal cross-references fixed, CLAUDE.md's own §-numbers left
untouched). docs/api/ added (points at contracts/openapi.yaml as the one
SSOT instead of duplicating it as drift-prone prose).

BACKLOG P1-21: packages/schemas now has a real package.json (was loose JSON
files with no package -- pnpm-workspace.yaml's packages/* glob matched an
empty package). Verified `pnpm install --frozen-lockfile` and the full
typecheck/test/build suite still pass with 2 real workspace projects.
apps/ restructuring explicitly NOT attempted (BACKLOG's own effort estimate
is "L" / large -- moving the whole app tree is a bigger, riskier change than
belongs in this pass). Import-boundary check added via dependency-cruiser
(ARK-14) -- installed for real, config tested against this codebase (179
modules, 310 deps, 0 violations), wired as `pnpm run deps:check` (advisory,
not yet a CI gate).

BACKLOG P2-5: docs/02-architecture.md's "Hosting" section marked SUPERSEDED
(the Vercel plan was superseded by the Coolify deploy.target flip,
2026-08-09 -- ADR-0001). README.md/.env.example were checked and are
already accurately framed (live-on-Vercel vs. config-target-is-Coolify) --
not touched.

BACKLOG P3-5: 2 stale github.com/sax3l/0pt/pull/3 links removed (the PR
merged long ago, .env.example is real and current) -- docs/09-build-plan.md,
docs/08-infrastructure.md. The "two diverged remotes, unresolved which is
canonical" language elsewhere (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, SECURITY.md, etc.) is
deliberately NOT touched -- that's a live, correctly-flagged, account-owner-
owned open question per the Gitea-exclusivity mandate, not a stale link.

BACKLOG P6 (19 items): concrete artifacts for the ones that are actually a
file (.editorconfig, dependency-cruiser, deprecation policy, K8s reference
manifest, .actrc, Makefile, ONBOARDING.md); docs/guides/P6-GUIDES.md for the
rest (CLI-13, DOC-18, UI-30, IAM-19, PAY-11, AI-18, OBS-21, TEST-20, NET-19,
SCALE-13, OSS-10, AGENT-13) -- each grounded in this repo's actual code/gaps,
not generic advice.

NOT attempted (out of this task's scope, noted for the record):
- P2-1 (cl0ud app-registry.ts mismatch) -- lives in a different repo
  (sax3l/cl0ud), not cloned/authorized for this task's single-repo PR flow.
- The CI "doctor step" half of P1-15 -- deliberately left out of this PR's
  .gitea/workflows/ci.yml to avoid a 3-way merge conflict with
  ci/security-headers-and-scanning, which already restructured that file;
  add it as a follow-up once that PR merges.

This branch was authored independently of, but shares docs/architecture/
ARCHITECTURE.md and docs/slo.md with, fix/honest-health-check and
ci/security-headers-and-scanning -- expect a small, normal merge conflict
if this is rebased after either of those merge first (both already rebased
cleanly against each other and against main as of this commit).
2026-08-11 14:18:00 +02:00
adminandClaude Sonnet 5 2902a26bac docs: full accuracy overhaul, grounded claim-by-claim in real code (#4)
* docs: full accuracy overhaul, grounded claim-by-claim in real code

Every doc in this repo (CLAUDE.md, README.md, SECURITY.md, docs/*.md) was
audited and rewritten by a multi-pass process: independent rewrite per
cluster, adversarial re-verification of that rewrite against the actual
code, then a final cross-doc consistency pass — each stage re-checking
claims against the repo directly rather than trusting the previous stage.

Two corrections matter most:

1. docs/ICEBERG_WRITE_BOUNDARY.md, docs/11-lakehouse-write-plan.md, and
   docs/P0_QUERY_SOURCE_FLOW.md asserted src/services/quality-check-service.ts,
   quality-report-service.ts, src/data-platform/services/catalog-service.ts,
   and sql/002_p0_dataset_quality.sql/sql/003_*.sql as real, tested code.
   git log --all across every branch shows zero commits for any of these
   paths, ever. 0pt's data-quality/QA enforcement does not exist in code.
   Corrected everywhere, with a new docs/P0_DATASET_QUALITY_FLOW.md added
   as an explicit target-spec (not-yet-built) replacement.

2. github.com/sax3l/0pt (this repo) and git.siax.io/sax3l/0pt (Gitea) are
   two diverged remotes sharing part of the same history (services/api/
   workers/adaptive_router.py is byte-identical between them). Gitea's main
   independently accumulated a WAF-bypass/proxy-rotation scraper stack in
   three 2026-07-13 commits, since removed via a Gitea PR; GitHub's main
   never had it. Which remote is canonical/deployed is unresolved — flagged
   consistently across the corpus, not decided here.

Also newly and consistently documented: the tenant_id/project_id-read-from-
client-body gap on the P0 lakehouse/rate-policy/source-query routes (no
auth/session system exists anywhere in this repo yet); that every CL0UD/
N0D/AUD0/ST0RE platform client is real but mock-only (zero process.env
reads for any of their *_URL vars); that two P0 mutation routes
(lakehouse/mappings, sources/rate-policies) always fail over HTTP today
because their prerequisite entity can never be created via any route; a
schema bug in sql/004 (FK references to opt_datasets/opt_sources, which
don't exist); and that 0pt.app's live deployment was independently
confirmed (curled this pass) to be running this exact codebase with
DATABASE_URL/REDIS_URL unset in production.

New file: docs/12-edge-capability-api.md — the edge-native P0 TypeScript
capability contract (app/api/0pt/*, /api/screen, /api/ai/parse), previously
undocumented and distinct from docs/04-api.md's FastAPI-engine-only scope.

Verified before commit: tsc --noEmit clean; vitest run 88 passed, 1 todo,
0 failures (13 files) — docs-only change, no source touched.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: reflect PR #5's lakehouse-mapping-registry + status-code fixes

Follow-up to keep docs/12-edge-capability-api.md accurate once both PRs
land: fix/0pt-full-bug-hunt (#5) fixed the shared-instance bug in the
lakehouse mapping routes and added proper status-code mapping to the
document extraction route. This doc was written against the pre-fix
state in the same pass that added it, so it needs the same correction.

Does not claim the lakehouse write path fully works now -- the deeper
dataset-registration gap (no route ever calls DatasetService.registerDataset)
is unchanged and still blocks it end-to-end; only the shared-instance half
of the bug is fixed.

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-22 18:49:01 +02:00
adminandClaude Opus 4.8 22e09d984d feat: rebrand MONO->0pt (hero, header, layout) + add project docs/contract
Hero is now a data-native 0pt artifact (no photos, keeps grain/reveal/float); header is the 0pt wordmark with Swedish nav; layout is sv + loads JetBrains Mono + 0pt metadata; globals wires the loaded fonts. Adds CLAUDE.md + docs/01-09 as the build contract. next build green (5 routes).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-24 17:38:07 +02:00